PROSPECTS

, Volume 47, Issue 1–2, pp 3–16 | Cite as

Disrupting power/entrenching sovereignty: The paradox of human rights education

Viewpoints/Controversies

Abstract

While human rights education (HRE) provides the tools for emancipation, it remains susceptible to appropriation by authoritarian regimes who seek to entrench state power. Classification scholars who typologize approaches to HRE fail to acknowledge that state entities could employ human rights discourse to reinforce state sovereignty. Consequently, this article develops the idea of HRE as sovereignty, to describe states that employ human rights language to reinforce power, and HRE as disruption, to acknowledge the existence of social justice movements that operate outside legally based human rights frameworks to challenge state power. Furthermore, the article argues that HRE as sovereignty and disruption has its genesis in the global South, primarily as a response to the universalizing mission embedded in global human rights discourse.

Keywords

Human rights education Sovereignty Disruption 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, A. K. (2017). #RhodesMustFall: Decolonization, praxis and disruption. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 9, 8–13.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, A. K. (2018). Bridging the ‘values gap’: Human rights education, ideology, and the global-local nexus. In M. Zembylas & A. Keet (Eds.), Critical human rights, citizenship and democracy education (pp. 173–189). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Aitken, S. C. (2015). Children’s rights: A critical geographic perspective. In W. Vandenhole, E. Desmet, D. Rynaert, & S. Lembrechts (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of children’s studies (pp. 131–146). London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson-Levitt, K. (2012). Complicating the concept of culture. Comparative Education, 48(4), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arendt, H. (1958). The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  7. Arnove, R. F. (2013). Introduction: Reframing comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 1–26). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Asad, T. (2000). What do human rights do?An anthropological enquiry. Theory & Event, 4(4), 6–35.Google Scholar
  9. Azoulay, A. (2015). What are human rights? Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 35(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bajaj, M. (2011). Human rights education: Ideology, location, and approaches. Human Rights Quarterly, 33, 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barreto, J. M. (Ed.). (2013). Human rights from a third world perspective: Critique, history and international law. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  12. Brady, J. F. (2006). Public pedagogy and educational leadership: Politically engaged scholarly communities and possibilities for critical engagement. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 3(1), 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bromley, P., Meyer, J., & Ramirez, F. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discoursein social studies, history, and civics textbooks, 1970–2008. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardenas, S. (2005). Constructing rights? Human rights education and the state. International Political Science Review, 26(4), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2011). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cislaghi, B., Gillespie, D., & Mackie, G. (2017). Expanding the aspirational map: Interactive learning and human rights in Tostan’s community empowerment program. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 251–266). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the south. In J. Comaroff & J. Comaroff (Eds.), Theory from the south (pp. 1–49). London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, L. (2011). Can education interrupt fragility? Towards the resilient and adaptable state. In K. Mundy & S. Dryden-Peterson (Eds.), Educating children in conflict zones: Research, policy, and practice for systemic change (a tribute to Jackie Kirk). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dentith, A. M., & Brady, J. (1999). Theories of public pedagogies as possibilities for ethical action and community resistance: A curricular notion. Paper presented at the AERA: Research on Women and Education SIG Conference, Hempstead, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Dudai, R. (2017). Entryism, mimicry and victimhood work: The adoption of human rights discourse by right-wing groups in Israel. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(7), 866–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flowers, N. (2004). How to define human rights education? A complex answer to a simple question. In V. B. Georgi & M. Seberich (Eds.), International perspectives in human rights education (Vol. 112, pp. 105–127). Washington, DC: Bertelsmann Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, N. (2012). The geography and political context of human rights education: Israel as a case study. Journal of Human Rights, 11, 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilker, L. M. (2011). The role of education in driving conflict and building peace: The case of Rwanda. Prospects, 41, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland, T., & Martin, J. P. (2014). Human rights education and peacebuilding: A comparative study. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Jallad, Z. (2016). The power of the body: Analyzing the logic of law and social change in the Arab Spring. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 6(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
  28. Kapur, R. (2006). Human rights in the 21st century: Take a walk on the dark side. Sydney Law Review, 28(4), 665–687.Google Scholar
  29. Karrim, N., & Keet, A. (2005). Infusing human rights into the curriculum: The case of the revised South African national curriculum statement. Perspectives in Education, 23(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
  30. Kearney, M. (1995). The local and the global: The anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 547–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keet, A. (2010). Human rights education: A conceptual analysis. Saarbrücken: Lambert.Google Scholar
  32. Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, betrayal, critique: The renewal of human rights education. In C. Roux (Ed.), Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 7–28). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keet, A. (2014). Plasticity, critical hope and the regeneration of human rights education. In V. Bozalek, B. Leibowitz, R. Carolissen, & M. Boler (Eds.), Discerning critical hope in educational practices (pp. 69–81). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Keet, A. (2015). It is time: Critical human rights education in an age of counter-hegemonic distrust. Education as Change, 19(3), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mbembe, A. (2016). Decolonizing the university: New directions. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, J., Bromley-Martin, P., & Ramirez, F. (2010). Human rights in social science textbooks: Cross-national analyses, 1970–2008. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, J., Boli, J., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of sociology, 103(1), 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrow, R., & Torres, C. (2000). The state, globalization and educational policy. In N. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 27–56). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mutua, M. W. (2001). Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal, 42(1), 201–245.Google Scholar
  42. Mutua, M. W. (2004). Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2016). #RhodesMustFall: Nibbling at resilient colonialism in South Africa. Mankon: Langaa Research and Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. O’Malley, M. P., & Nelson, S. W. (2013). The public pedagogy of student activists in Chile: What have we learned from the Penguins’ Revolution? Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(2), 41–56.Google Scholar
  45. Perugini, N., & Gordon, N. (2015). The human right to dominate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramirez, F., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell, S. G. (2015). Global civil society and education policy in post-genocide Rwanda. International Sociology, 30(6), 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Russell, S. G., & Suárez, D. F. (2017). Symbol and substance: human rights education as an emergent global institution. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 19–46). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, S. G., & Tiplic, D. (2014). Rights-based education and conflict: A cross-national study of rights discourse in textbooks. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(3), 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salinas, D., & Fraser, P. (2012). Educational opportunity and contentious politics: The 2011 Chilean student movement. Berkley Review of Education, 3(1), 17–47.Google Scholar
  51. Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  52. Schriewer, J. (2012). Comparative education methodology in transition: Towards the study of complexity? In J. Schreiwer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (4th ed., pp. 3–52). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  53. Speed, S., & Collier, J. F. (2000). Limiting indigenous autonomy in Chiapas, Mexico: The state government’s use of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 877–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (2012). Policy borrowing and lending: 2012 World yearbook of education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Suárez, D. F. (2007). Human rights and curricular policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Comparative Education Review, 51(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tarrow, N. (1992). Human rights education: Alternative conceptions. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Human rights, education and global responsibilities (pp. 21–50). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tibbitts, F. (2002). Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tibbitts, F. (2017). Evolution of human rights education models. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 69–95). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  60. UN [United Nations] (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
  61. UN (1994). Decade for human rights education. Website of the United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/Pages/Decade.aspx.
  62. UN (2014). World program for human rights education: Plan of action for the third phase (2015–2019) of the world programme for human rights education. Website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/WPHRE/ThirdPhase/Pages/ThirdPhaseIndex.aspx.
  63. UNESCO (1978). International congress on the teaching of human rights. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0003/000326/032644eb.pdf.
  64. Volger, J. (2006). Chile: The rise of the Penguin Revolution. UpsideDownWorld.org. http://upsidedownworld.org/archives/chile/chile-the-rise-of-the-penguin-revolution/.
  65. Zembylas, M. (2015). Foucault and human rights: Seeking the renewal of human rights education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations