Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 131–147 | Cite as

Popularity of the decentralization reform and its effects on the quality of education

  • Anila ChannaEmail author
Open File

Abstract

Policymakers have increasingly advocated decentralization as a way of enhancing educational quality, although its potential in this area is still subject to debate. This article traces the impetus and popularity of the reform as a policy solution over the past few decades. It argues that three trends in particular have characterized the post-2000 era: a deepening of reforms implemented earlier, an enhanced focus on school decentralization interventions, and a notable increase in schemes in the African region. Interestingly, in individual nations, donor agencies have often encouraged the reforms that make up these trends. The article then examines the empirical evidence on the relationship between decentralization and educational quality, using detailed case studies of Indonesia and Kenya. The case studies not only showcase these decentralization trends but also demonstrate that different decentralization approaches can result in dramatically different outcomes in educational quality. On this front, the article argues that design and implementation features tend to shape quality outcomes—and those features, in turn, are fundamentally shaped by economic conditions as well as by the politics of donors and local stakeholders.

Keywords

Education quality Decentralization School-based management Indonesia Kenya 

References

  1. Bando, R. (2010). The effect of school-based management on parent behavior and the quality of education in Mexicos. Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Barrera-Osorio, F., Patrinos, H., & Fasih, T. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, C., Mude, A., & Omiti, J. (2007). Decentralization and the social economics of development: Lessons from Kenya. Oxford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behrman, J., Deolalikar, A., & Soon, L. (2002). Promoting effective schooling through education decentralization in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Philippines. Economics working paper 23. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Blimpo, M., & Evans, D. (2011). School-based management and educational outcomes: Lessons from a randomized field experiment. Unpublished manuscript. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/Blimpo-Evans_WSD-2012-01-12.pdf.
  6. Bold, T., Kimenyi, M., Mwabu, G., & Welcome, P. (2012). Interventions and institutions: Experimental evidence on scaling up education reforms in Kenya. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/pdfs/csae-wps-2013-04.pdf.
  7. Borman, G., Hewes, G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodjonegoro, B. (2004). Three years of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: Its impacts on regional economic development and fiscal sustainability. Presented at the Symposium on Fiscal Decentralization. http://www.econ.hit-u.ac.jp/~kokyo/APPPsympo04/Indonesia(Bambang).pdf.
  9. Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell, B. (2005). School-based management (Vol. 3). Paris: UNESCO Institute for Education Planning.Google Scholar
  11. Channa, A. (2014). Decentralization and the quality of education. Background paper for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002324/232418e.pdf.
  12. Channa, A., & Faguet, J. P. (2012). Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: A quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature. Economic Organization and Public Policy Discussion paper 38. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/44887/.
  13. De Grauwe, A. (2005). School-based management (SBM): Does it improve quality? Background paper for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/Images/0014/001466/146639e.pdf.
  14. Di Gropello, E. (2002). An assessment of the impact of decentralization on the quality of education in Chile. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2008). Peer effects, pupil-teacher ratios, and teacher incentives: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. National Bureau of Economic Research Paper 14475. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  16. Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(4), 867–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiske, E. (1996). Decentralization of education: Politics and consensus. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freinkman, L., & Plekhanov, A. (2009). Fiscal decentralization in rentier regions: Evidence from Russia. World Development, 37(2), 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of Public Economics, 92(10–11), 2106–2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gershberg, A., & Winkler, D. (2003). Education decentralization in Africa: A review of recent policy and practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 945–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guess, G. (2005). Comparative decentralization lessons from Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P., Sánchez, M., & Verdisco, A. (2009). Does local school control raise student outcomes? Evidence on the roles of school autonomy and parental participation. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanushek, E. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanushek, E., Link, S., & Woessman, L. (2011). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. National Bureau of Economic Research Paper 17591.Google Scholar
  26. Hofman, B., & Guerra, S. (2005). Fiscal disparities in East Asia: How large and do they matter? In T. W. Bank (Ed.), East Asia decentralizes: Making local government work. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (1999). Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khattri, N., Ling, C., & Jha, S. (2010). The effects of school-based management in the Philippines: An initial assessment using administrative data. World Bank policy research working paper 5248. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar
  29. King, E., & Guerra, S. (2005). Education reforms in East Asia: Policy, process and impact. In T. W. Bank (Ed.), East Asia decentralizes: Making local government work (pp. 179–208). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Kremer, M., Moulin, S., & Namunyu, R. (2003). Decentralization: A cautionary tale. Poverty Action Lab Paper 10.Google Scholar
  31. Kristiansen, S., & Pratikno, S. (2006). Decentralising education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(5), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational policy, 12(3), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998). Rethinking decentralization in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Litvack, J., & Seddon, J. (1999). Decentralization briefing notes. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Malen, B., Ogawa, R., & Kranz, J. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. Choice and Control in American Education, 2, 289–342.Google Scholar
  36. Menon, B., Mutero, J., & Macharia, S. (2008). Decentralization and local governments in Kenya. International Studies Programme working paper 08-32. Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  37. Murnane, R., Willet, J., & Cardenas, S. (2006). Did participation of schools in Programa Escuelas de Calidad (PEC) influence student outcomes? Working paper, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Ndegwa, S., & Levy, B. (2003). The politics of decentralization in Africa: A comparative analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  39. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  40. Paes de Barros, R., & Mendonca, R. (1998). The impact of three institutional innovations in Brazilian education. In W. D. Savedoff (Ed.), Organization matters: Agency problems in health and education. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  41. PISA (2015). Website. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
  42. Pradhan, M., Suryadarma, D., Beatty, A, Wong, M., Alishjabana, A., & Gaduh, A. (2011). Improving educational quality through enhancing community participation: Results from a randomized field experiment in Indonesia. Policy research working paper 5795. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  43. Prud’homme, R. (1995). On the dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer, 10, 210.Google Scholar
  44. Rakner, L., Menocal, A., & Fritz, V. (Eds.) (2007). Democratisation’s third wave and the challenges of democratic deepening: Assessing international democracy assistance and lessons learned. London: ODI.Google Scholar
  45. Rocaboy, Y., Valliancourt, F., & Hugounenq, R. (2013). Public finances of local government in Kenya. In B. Dafflon & T. Madies (Eds.), The political economy of decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa: A new implementation model in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya and Senegal (pp. 161–206). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. Rondinelli, D. A., Cheema, G. S., & Nellis, J. (1983). Decentralization in developing countries: A review of recent experience. World Bank staff working paper 581. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  47. Sang, J., & Sang, H. (2011). Decentralization of school management to boards of governors in secondary schools in Kenya: A case of Trans-Nzoia County. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 158–164.Google Scholar
  48. Shah, A., Thompson, T., & Zou, H. (2004). The impact of decentralization on service delivery, corruption, fiscal management and growth in developing and emerging market economies: A synthesis of empirical evidence. CESifo DICE Report, 1, 10–14.Google Scholar
  49. Simatupang, R. (2009). Evaluation of decentralization outcomes in Indonesia: Analysis of health and education sectors. Ph.D. dissertation. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  50. Skoufias, E., & Shapiro, J. (2006). Evaluating the impact of Mexico’s quality schools program: The pitfalls of using nonexperimental data. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-4036.
  51. Skoufias, E., Narayan, A., Kaiser, K., & Dasgupta, B. (2011). Electoral accountability, fiscal decentralization and service delivery in Indonesia. Policy and Research Series paper 5614. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  52. Smoke, P. (1993). Local government fiscal reform in developing countries: Lessons from Kenya. World Development, 21(6), 901–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tanzi, V. (1995). Fiscal federalism and efficiency: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  54. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. TIMSS [Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study] (2015). Website. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/.
  56. Toi, A. (2010). An empirical study of the effects of decentralization in Indonesian junior secondary education. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. UIS [UNESCO Institute of Statistics] (2014). http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx.
  58. UNESCO (2006). Decentralization of education in Indonesia. Report presented at UNESCO conference on EFA Implementation: Teacher and Resource Management in the Context of Decentralization in Hyderabad, India. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001470/147087e.pdf.
  59. Winkler, D. (1989). Decentralization in education. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  60. World Bank (2008). Decentralization in client countries: An evaluation of the World Bank support, 1990–2007. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank (2012). Implementation of school-based management in Indonesia. Jakarta: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Development Studies, SOASUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations