Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 55–71 | Cite as

The demand for and the provision of early childhood services since 2000: Policies and strategies

  • Sheldon Shaeffer
Open File

Abstract

Since the Millennium Development Goals and Education for All targets were proclaimed in 2000, countries have made considerable progress in enhancing the well-being of young children. But many young children—including 78% in the Arab states and over 80% in sub-Saharan Africa—still have no access to this education. Obstacles to increasing the demand for early childhood development (ECD) services include structural and political factors, a lack of visibility of these services, poor quality (including their lack of adaptability to clients’ individual needs), high costs to both providers and consumers, and such cultural and contextual constraints as low parental and community awareness of the importance of ECD. Yet, societies can design policies and strategies to increase demand in a variety of ways. These include laws, policies, and action plans—and more financing—meant to expand affordable ECD services; increased parent and community awareness of ECD benefits; promotion of holistic, integrated approaches to early childhood; clear standards of quality for ECD services and for early learning and development; and strategies and programmes to identify and support those groups most in need of quality ECD services.

Keywords

Early childhood development Early childhood services Education for all Millennium development goals 

References

  1. ARNEC [Asia-Pacific Resource Network on Early Childhood] (2012). Promoting holistic development of young children: An imperative for the advancement of nations in Asia-Pacific. Singapore: ARNEC.Google Scholar
  2. Dakar Declaration (2000). Dakar Declaration on Education for All. http://www.unesco.org/carneid/dakar.pdf
  3. Gilligan, D. O., & Roy, S. (2013). Resources, stimulation, and cognition: How transfer programs and preschool shape cognitive development in Uganda. Conference paper for 2013 Annual Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Washington, DC, 4–6 August.Google Scholar
  4. Global Child Development Group (2011). Child development series: Executive summary. The Lancet. Kingston: Global Child Development Group. www.globalchilddevelopment.org
  5. Hartwell, A. (2010). National Literacy Acceleration Program (NALAP): Implementation study. Accra: USAID. See also http://www.cal.org/equall/biliteracy/nalapmaterials.html
  6. Macours, K., Schady, N., & Vakis, R. (2012). Cash transfers, behavioral changes, and cognitive development in early childhood: Evidence from a randomized experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 247–273.Google Scholar
  7. PM [Prime Minister, Socialist Republic of Vietnam] (2010). Decision no. 239/QD-TTg approving the scheme on universal preschool education for children aged five years in the 2010–2015 period. Hanoi: Vietnam.Google Scholar
  8. RTI International (2011). Ghana National Education Assessment: 2011 findings report. Accra: USAID.Google Scholar
  9. UIS [UNESCO Institute of Statistics] (2012). Data extraction from UIS Dissemination Database. http://data.uis.unesco.org/.
  10. UNESCO (2012). Expanding equitable early childhood care and education is an urgent need. Policy paper 03. Prepared for the EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  11. UNESCO (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2013/4. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  12. UNESCO Bangkok (2015). Parenting education guidebook and the facilitators’ handbook for parenting education. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  13. UNICEF (2012). Inequities in early childhood development: What the data say—Evidence from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  14. Woodhead, M., & Streuli, N. (2013). Early education for all: Is there a role for the private sector? In P. Britto, P. Engle, & C. Super (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood development research and its impact on global policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations