Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 627–638 | Cite as

Learning at the bottom of the pyramid: Constraints, comparability and policy in developing countries

  • Daniel A. WagnerEmail author
  • Nathan M. Castillo
Trends/ Cases

Abstract

United Nations development goals have consistently placed a high priority on the quality of education—and of learning. This has led to substantive increases in international development assistance to education, and also to broader attention, worldwide, to the importance of children’s learning. Yet, such goals are mainly normative: they tend to be averages across nations, with relatively limited attention to variations within countries. This review provides an analysis of the scientific tensions in understanding learning among poor and marginalized populations: those at the bottom of the pyramid. While international agencies, such as UNESCO and OECD, often invoke these populations as the “target” of their investments and assessments, serious debates continue around the empirical science involved in both research and policy. The present analysis concludes that the UN post-2015 development goals must take into account the critical need to focus on learning among the poor in order to adequately address social and economic inequalities.

Keywords

Learning Low- and middle-income countries Poor and marginalized populations Learning outcomes Constraints Comparability Education policy 

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babson, A. (2010). The place of English in expanding repertoires of linguistic code, identification and aspiration among recent high school graduates in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight poverty. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, L., & Garcia, O. (2011). Additive schooling in subtractive times: Bilingual education and Dominican immigrant youth in the Heights. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benavot, A., & Tanner, E. (2007). The growth of national learning assessments in the world, 1995–2006. Background paper prepared for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  6. Benedict, M., & Hoag, J. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance? The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjea, S., Wadhwa, W., & R. Banerji, R. (2011). Inside primary schools: A study of teaching and learning in rural India. New Delhi: ASER. http://img.asercentre.org/docs/Publications/Inside_Primary_School/Report/tl_study_print_ready_version_oct_7_2011.pdf.
  8. Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Bloem, S. (2013). PISA in low and middle income countries. OECD education working papers, no. 93. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  10. Braun, H., & Kanjee, A. (2006). Using assessment to improve education in developing nations. In J. E. Cohen, D. E. Bloom, & M. B. Malin (Eds.), Educating all children: A global agenda (pp. 303–353). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brookings Institution (2013). Toward universal learning: Recommendations from the Learning Metrics Task Force. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center for Universal Education. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Reports/2013/09/learning%20metrics%20task%20force%20universal%20learning/LTMF%20RecommendationsReportfinalweb.pdf.
  12. Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchmann, C., & Hannum, E. (2001). Education and stratification in developing countries: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castillo, N. M., & Wagner, D. A. (2014). Gold standard? The use of randomized controlled trials for international educational policy. Comparative Education Review, 58(1), 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., & Sharp, D. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Cortina, R. (Ed.) (2014). The education of indigenous citizens in Latin America. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  17. DBE [Department of Basic Education], South Africa (2013). Report on the Annual National Assessment of 2013: Grades 1 to 6 & 9. Pretoria: DBE. http://www.education.gov.za/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Aiw7HW8ccic%3D&tabid=36.
  18. Dudley-Marling, C., & Gurn, A. (Eds.) (2010). The myth of the normal curve. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Engel, L. C., & Feuer, M. J. (2014). Five myths about international large-scale assessments. Quality Assurance in Education, 22, 18–21.Google Scholar
  20. GEFI [Global Education First Initiative] (2014). Global Education First Initiative: An initiative of the United Nations Secretary-General. http://www.globaleducationfirst.org/files/GEFI_Brochure_ENG.pdf.
  21. Gilmore, A. (2005). The impact of PIRLS (2001) and TIMSS (2003) in low- and middle-income countries: An evaluation of the value of World Bank support for international surveys of reading literacy (PIRLS) and mathematics and science (TIMSS). New Zealand: IEA.Google Scholar
  22. Gove, A., & Wetterberg, A. (2011). The early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greaney, V., & Kellaghan, T. (1996). Monitoring the learning outcomes of education systems. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurn, A. (2010). Conclusion: Re/visioning the ideological imagination in (special) education. In C. Dudley-Marling & A. Gurn (Eds.), The myth of the normal curve (pp. 241–256). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Harper, S. R. (2012). Black male student success in higher education: A report from the National Black Male College Achievement Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education.Google Scholar
  26. Heinrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral Brain Science, 33(2–3), 85–135.Google Scholar
  27. ILI [International Literacy Institute] (2002). Towards guidelines for the improvement of literacy assessment in developing countries: Conceptual dimensions based on the LAP project. Philadelphia: ILI/UNESCO.Google Scholar
  28. Kagan, J., Moss, H. A., & Sigel, I. E. (1963). Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 28(4), 73–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Korinek, K., & Punpuing, S. (2012). The effect of household and community on school attrition: An analysis of Thai youth. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 474–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kremer, M., & Holla, A. (2009). Improving education in the developing world: What have we learned from randomized evaluations? Annual Review of Economics, 1, 513–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, J. (2003). U.S. and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu, Y., & Treiman, D. J. (2011). Migration, remittances and educational stratification among Blacks in Apartheid and Post-Apartheid South Africa. Social Forces, 89(4), 1119–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.) (2013). PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  35. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (2014). PISA for development. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisafordevelopment.htm.
  37. Pigozzi, M. J., Carrol, B., Hayden, J., & Ndaruhutse, S. (2014). Fragile and conflict-affected situations. In D. A. Wagner (Ed.), Learning and education in developing countries: Research and policy for the post-2015 UN development goals (pp. 58–73). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Piper, B., & Korda, M. (2010). Early grade reading assessment (EGRA) plus: Liberia. Program evaluation report: Prepared for USAID/Liberia. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
  39. Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Saito, M. (2011). Gender equality in education: Looking beyond parity. Paris: UNESCO IIEP. http://www.sacmeq.org/sites/default/files/sacmeq/publications/7_1_1_5_mioko_saito_eng_version_2012_02_15.pdf.
  41. Sjoberg, S. (2007). PISA and ‘real life challenges’: Mission impossible? In S. T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl (Eds.), PISA according to PISA: Does PISA keep what it promises? (pp. 203–224). Vienna: LIT Verlag. http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/Sjoberg-PISA-book-2007.pdf.
  42. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1982). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit.Google Scholar
  43. UNESCO (2003). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Gender and Education for All—The leap to equality. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  44. UNESCO (2010). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Reaching the marginalized. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  45. United Nations (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. United Nations A/RES/55/2. http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm.
  46. Wagner, D. A. (1983). Rediscovering ‘rote’: Some cognitive and pedagogical preliminaries. In S. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 179–190). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wagner, D. A. (1993). Literacy, culture and development: Becoming literate in Morocco. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, D. A. (2010). Quality of education, comparability, and assessment choice in developing countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 741–760.Google Scholar
  49. Wagner, D. A. (2011a). What happened to literacy? Historical and conceptual perspectives on literacy in UNESCO. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner, D. A. (2011b). Smaller, quicker, cheaper: Improving learning assessments in developing countries. Paris & Washington, DC: UNESCO IIEP and EFA Fast Track Initiative of Global Partnership for Education.Google Scholar
  51. Wagner, D. A. (Ed.) (2014). Learning and education in developing countries: Research and policy for the post-2015 UN Development Goals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Wagner, D. A., Murphy, K. M., & de Korne, H. (2012). Learning first: A research agenda for improving learning in low-income countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  53. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations