Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 547–558 | Cite as

The future of schooling: Children and learning at the edge of chaos

  • Sugata MitraEmail author
Open File

Abstract

This paper describes the effect that assistive technologies, such as paper, printing, protractors, logarithm tables, computers, and the Internet, have on pedagogy. It reports the results of experiments with self-organising systems in primary education and develops the concept of a self-organised learning environment (SOLE). It then describes how SOLEs operate, and their possible effects on primary education in remote areas, and discusses the implications of the physics of complex systems and their possible connection with self-organised learning amongst children. Finally, it proposes a change in the examination system that would incorporate the Internet and concepts of self-organisation into schooling.

Keywords

Complex systems Curriculum Internet Learning Primary education Self-organised learning environment 

References

  1. CALResCo [Complexity & Artificial Life Research Concept] (2007). Complex systems glossary. New Mills: CALResCo. http://www.calresco.org/glossary.htm.
  2. CCSSI [Common Core State Standards Initiative] (2014). English language arts standards, history/social studies, grade 6–8. CCSSI. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RH/6-8.
  3. Dangwal, R., & Kapur, P. (2008). Children’s learning processes using unsupervised “hole in the wall” computers in shared public spaces. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 339–354.Google Scholar
  4. Dangwal, R., & Kapur, P. (2009a). Learning through teaching: Peer-mediated instruction in minimally invasive education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dangwal, R., & Kapur, P. (2009b). Social networking effect at “HiWEL” kiosks amongst children. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(4), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dangwal, R., Sharma, K., & Hazarika, S. (2014). Hole-in-the-wall learning stations and academic performance among rural children in India. Journal for Multicultural Education, 8(1), 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dangwal, R., & Thounaojam, M. (2011). Self regulatory behaviour and minimally invasive (MIE) education: A case study in the Indian context. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 7(1), 120–140.Google Scholar
  8. DeBoer, J. (2009). The relationship between environmental factors and usage behaviors at ‘Hole-in-the-wall’ computers. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(1), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmenreich, W., & de Meer, H. (2008). Self-organizing networked systems for technical applications: A discussion on open issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5343, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heisenberg, W. V. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik [The actual content of quantum theoretical kinematics and mechanics]. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3–4), 172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huxley, J. S., & Huxley, T. H. (1947). Evolution and ethics: 1893–1943. London: The Pilot Press.Google Scholar
  12. Inamdar, P. (2004). Computer skills development by children using ‘Hole in the Wall’ facilities in rural India. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 337–350.Google Scholar
  13. Inamdar, P., & Kulkarni, A. (2007). ‘Hole-In-The-Wall’ computer kiosks foster mathematics achievement: A comparative study. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 170–179.Google Scholar
  14. Mitra, S. (2010). Give them a laptop and a group of pupils will teach themselves. The Guardian, educational supplement, 19 October.Google Scholar
  15. Mitra, S. (2012). Beyond the hole in the wall: Discover the power of self-organized learning. New York: TED Books.Google Scholar
  16. Mitra, S., & Dangwal, R. (2010). Limits to self-organising systems of learning: The Kalikuppam experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 672–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., & Thadani, L. (2008). Effects of remoteness on the quality of education: A case study from North Indian schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 168–180.Google Scholar
  18. Mitra, S., Ritu, D., Shiffon, C., Jha, S., Bisht, R. S., & Kapur, P. (2005). Acquisition of computer literacy on shared public computers: Children and the “hole in the wall”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 407–426.Google Scholar
  19. Mitra, S., Tooley, J., Inamdar, P., & Dixon, P. (2003). Improving English pronunciation: An automated instructional approach. Information Technology and International Development, 1(1), 741–783.Google Scholar
  20. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656. http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf.
  21. SOLE [Self Organised Learning Environment] (2014). Organizational website. https://www.theschoolinthecloud.org/.
  22. Taylor, M. (2007). Battle in print: The debate over examinations is little more than a War of the Poses. Battle of Ideas. November 20. http://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/site/battles/1072.

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Communication and Language SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations