Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 527–546 | Cite as

The curriculum debate: Why it is important today

  • Juan Carlos Tedesco
  • Renato OperttiEmail author
  • Massimo Amadio
Open File

Abstract

This article highlights some of the key issues in current discussions around curriculum, such as values education, inclusive education, competency-based approaches, soft and hard skills, and scientific and digital culture. It starts with the assumption that quality education for all is necessary to achieve social justice, and it looks at curricula as resulting from a process that reflects a societal agreement about the what, why, and how of education needed for the society in the future. Given the crucial tasks facing education systems—they must impart values to achieve a more just and inclusive society, must provide a variety of learning experiences to train a competent and active citizenship, and must ensure quality and equity in learning outcomes—the article argues that educators should first rethink the role of the school curriculum and ensure a wider policy dialogue around curriculum design and development.

Keywords

Curriculum Competences Inclusive education Values Skills Social justice 

References

  1. Ainscow, M., & Miles, S. (2008). Making Education for All inclusive: Where next? Prospects, 38(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albornoz, F., & Warnes, P. (2013). Educación en América Latina: más gasto, ¿mismos resultados? [Education in Latin America: More spending, same results?]. Blog entry, Jorge Werthein blog. http://jorgewerthein.blogspot.com/2013/01/educacion-en-america-latina-mas-gasto.html.
  3. Amadio, M. (2014). A rapid assessment of curricula for general education focusing on cross-curricular themes and generic competences or skills. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2013/2014, Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Geneva: UNESCO IBE. unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002259/225939e.pdf.
  4. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competencies for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Paper No. 41. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  5. Brunello, G., & Schlotter, M. (2011). Non cognitive skills and personality traits: Labour market relevance and their development in education and training systems. Discussion Paper No. 5743. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  6. Coll, C., & Martín, E. (2006). The prevalence of the curriculum debate. Basic learning, competencies, and standards. The curriculum in the spotlight. PRELAC Journal, 3, 6–27. Santiago: UNESCO Regional Bureau of Education for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
  7. Cox, C. (2010). Informe de Referente Regional 2010. Oportunidades de aprendizaje escolar de la ciudadanía en América Latina: currículos comparados [Regional Reference Report 2010. School opportunities for learning citizenship in Latin America: A comparison of curricula]. Bogotá: CERLALC.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, C., Jaramillo, R., & Reimers, F. (2005). Education for democratic citizenship in the Americas: An agenda for action. Washington, DC: Department of Sustainable Development, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  9. De Armas, G., & Aristimuño, A. (2012). La transformación de la educación media en perspectiva comparada. Tendencias y experiencias innovadoras para el debate en Uruguay [The transformation of secondary education in a comparative perspective: Trends and innovative experiences for the debate in Uruguay]. Montevideo: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  10. Delors, J., et al. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  11. EPC [European Parliament and Council] (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Doc. 2006/962/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
  12. FNBE [Finnish National Board of Education] (2013). Social welfare services. Helsinki: FNBE. http://www.oph.fi/english.
  13. Frandji, D., & Rochex, J. Y. (2011). De la lutte contre les inégalités à l’adaptation aux «besoins spécifiques» [From fighting against inequalities to adjusting to "specific needs"]. Éducation & formations, 8, 95–108.Google Scholar
  14. García-Huidobro, E., & Corvalán, J. (2009). Barriers that prevent the achievement of inclusive democratic education. Prospects, 39(3), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon, J., Halász, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., et al. (2009). Key competencies in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. Network report no. 87. Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE).Google Scholar
  16. Jonnaert, P., Ettayebi, M., & Defise, R. (2009). Curriculum et compétences: Un cadre opérationnel [Curriculum and competencies: An operational framework]. Brussels: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  17. Kamens, D., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: Trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalization, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kärkkäinen, K. (2012). Bringing about curriculum innovations: Implicit approaches in the OECD area. OECD education working papers no. 82. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  19. Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings. Vancouver: National Council on Measurement in Education.Google Scholar
  20. Lenoir, Y., Xypas, C., & Jamet, C. (2006). École et citoyenneté. Un défi multiculturel [School and citizenship: A multicultural challenge]. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
  21. Levin, H. (2012). More than just test scores. Prospects, 42(3), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marina, J. A. (2011). El cerebro infantil: la gran oportunidad [The child’s brain: The great opportunity]. Barcelona: Planeta S.A.Google Scholar
  23. Pelgrum, W. J., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends, problems and prospects. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  24. Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.) (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21 st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pepper, D. (2011). Assessing key competences across the curriculum—and Europe. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pepper, D. (2012). KeyCoNet 2012 literature review: Assessment for key competencies. European Schoolnet and Key Competence Network on School Education (KeyCoNet). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Pons, F., de Rosnay, M., & Cuisinier, F. (2010). Cognition and emotion. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (Vol. 5, pp. 237–244). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rey, O. (2012). Les défis de l’évaluation des compétences [The challenges of competency assessment]. Dossier d’actualité veille et analyses, 76. Lyon: Institut français de l’éducation.Google Scholar
  29. Rosanvallon, P. (2011). La société des égaux [The society of equals]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Savolainen, H., & Halinen, I. (2009). De la educación inclusiva al currículo inclusivo [From inclusive education to inclusive curriculum]. Discussion paper on curriculum and inclusion. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.Google Scholar
  31. Schleicher, A. (2011). Educación: Una inversión estratégica con altos logros [Education: A strategic investment with high achievements]. Paper presented at the conference organized by the Center for Educational Studies of the Global Foundation for Democracy and Development, 18 April, Santo Domingo.Google Scholar
  32. Tucker, M. S. (2011). Standing on the shoulders of giants: An American agenda for education reform. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.Google Scholar
  33. UNESCO IBE [International Bureau of Education] (2009). Defining an inclusive education agenda: Reflections around the 48th session of the International Conference on Education. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.Google Scholar
  34. UNESCO IBE (2011). Interregional and regional perspectives on inclusive education: Follow-up of the 48th session of the International Conference on Education. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.Google Scholar
  35. UNESCO IBE (2013). Herramientas de formación para el desarrollo curricular: Una caja de recursos [Training tools for curriculum development: A resource pack]. Geneva: UNESCO IBE.Google Scholar
  36. UNESCO IBE, UNESCO BREDA [Dakar Regional Bureau for Education] & GTZ [Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit] (2009). The Basic Education in Africa Programme (BEAP): A policy paper—Responding to demands for access, quality, relevance and equity. Eschborn, Germany: BREDA/UNESCO IBE/GTZ.Google Scholar
  37. UNESCO PRELAC [Regional Education Project for Latin America and the Caribbean] & SEP [Secretariat of Public Education of Mexico] (2012). Situación educativa de América Latina y el Caribe. Hacia una educación para todos en 2015 y más allá [The state of education in Latin America and the Caribbean: Towards Education for All by 2015 and beyond]. Paper presented at the Third Extended Meeting of PRELAC, Mexico City, 29–30 January 2013. Santiago: UNESCO Regional Bureau for Education in Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
  38. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st century skills: Discussion paper. Report prepared for Kennisnet. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.Google Scholar
  39. World Bank (2011). World Bank Group education strategy 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Carlos Tedesco
    • 1
  • Renato Opertti
    • 2
    Email author
  • Massimo Amadio
    • 2
  1. 1.National University of San MartínSan MartínArgentina
  2. 2.UNESCO IBEGeneva 20Switzerland

Personalised recommendations