This paper analyzes the parent decision-making processes underlying school selection in Nepal. The analysis is based on primary survey and focus group data collected from parent meetings in diverse local education markets in two districts of Nepal in 2011. It highlights three main arguments that are less frequently discussed in the context of school choice, including in developing countries. First, children who go to public schools play a significant role in their own decision-making on schooling; this complicates the currently predominant conceptualization that schooling decisions are primarily made by parents and school officials. Second, the gradual growth in private schools has led to significant sorting of students and created a stigma around public education. Finally, in contexts such as Nepal, that suffer from political conflict, and poor conditions for law and order, a school’s proximity to their home becomes a greater priority for students and families.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education. Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.
Bhatta, P. (Ed.) (2009). Education in Nepal: Problems, reforms and social change. Kathmandu: Martin Chautari.
Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.
Caddell, M. (2007). Private schools and political conflict in Nepal. In P. Srivastava & G. Walford (Eds.), Private schooling in less economically developed countries: Asian and African perspectives (pp. 187–207). Didcot: Symposium.
Carney, S. (2003). Globalisation, neo-liberalism and the limitations of school effectiveness research in developing countries: The case of Nepal. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1(1), 87–101.
CBS [Central Bureau of Education Statistics] (2011). Nepal living standards survey 2010/11, vols. I and II. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission/ Government of Nepal.
CBS (2012). National population and housing census 2011, vols. I and II. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal. http://sites.google.com/site/nepalcensus/.
Chakrabarti, R., & Peterson, P. E. (Eds.) (2009). School choice international: Exploring public-private partnerships. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chakrabarti, R., & Roy, J. (2010). The economics of parental choice. In D. Brewer & P. McEwan (Eds.), Economics of education (pp. 336–342). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Elacqua, G., Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2006). School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 577–601.
Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. (2001). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 964–1107). New York: Elsevier.
Hastings, J. S., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program. NBER working paper 11805. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Haxton, C. (2010). Beyond parent management: The role of students and schools in Philadelphia’s high school “choice” process. Doctoral dissertation, retrieved from ProQuest, accession order no. AAT 3447663.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Howell, W. G. (2004). Dynamic selection effects in a means-tested urban school voucher program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 225–250.
Hsieh, C., & Urquiola, M. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile’s voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1477–1503.
ILO [International Labour Organisation] (2012). Nepal child labor report, based on data drawn from the Nepal Labor Force Survey 2008. http://www.ilo.org/ipec/Informationresources/WCMS_182002/lang-en/index.htm.
IMF [International Monetary Fund] (2012). Nepal: Staff report for the 2012 Article IV Consultation. IMF Country Report No. 12/326. Washington, DC: IMF.
Joshi, P. (2014). Continuing to exercise choice after selecting a school: Insights into parent-decision making in local education markets in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 37, 57–67.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
Kleitz, B., Weiher, G. R., Tedin, K., & Matland, R. (2000). Choice, charter schools, and household preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 846–849.
Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Why are schools racially segregated? Implications for school choice policies. In J. Scott (Ed.), School choice and diversity: What the evidence says (pp. 9–26). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lubienski, C., & Weitzel, P. (2010). The charter school experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
MacQueen, K. M., McLellan-Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., & Milstein, B. (2008). Team-based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 119–135). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Muralidharan, K., & Kremer, M. (2009). Public and private schools in India. In R. Chakrabarti & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), School choice international: Exploring public-private partnerships (pp. 91–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Plank, D. N., & Sykes, G. (2003). Choosing choice: School choice policies in international perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sharma, S., Thakurathi, M., Sapkota, K., Devkota, B., & Rimal, B. (2001). The situation of domestic child labourers in Kathmandu—a rapid assessment. Geneva: ILO/IPEC.
Simon, H. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.
Srivastava, P. (2007). Neither voice nor loyalty: School choice and the low-fee private sector in India. NCSPE working paper no. 134. http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP134_2.pdf.
Srivastava, P. (Ed.) (2013). Low-fee private schooling aggravating equity or mitigating disadvantage? Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
Srivastava, P., & Walford, G. (Eds.) (2008). Private schooling in less economically developed countries: Asian and African perspectives. Didcot, UK: Symposium Books.
Thapa, A. (2011). Does private school competition improve public school performance? The case of Nepal. Doctoral dissertation, retrieved from ProQuest, accession order no. AAT 3454029.
Upraity, T. N. (1962). Financing elementary education in Nepal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Yin, R. K. (2010). Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, P. Parent decision-making when selecting schools: The case of Nepal. Prospects 44, 411–428 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9319-9
- Parent decision-making
- School choice
- School selection
- Quality of education
- Public schools
- South Asia