Advertisement

PROSPECTS

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 335–349 | Cite as

Reacting to poverty: A comparative analysis of schools in Brazilian deprived areas

  • Aina TarabiniEmail author
  • Xavier Bonal
  • Oscar Valiente
Open File
  • 228 Downloads

Abstract

Schools in the most deprived areas in Brazil are marked by extreme poverty, a situation that has obvious consequences for the everyday life in schools and for efforts to develop a supportive culture of schooling. Nevertheless, schools’ responses to poverty are far from uniform. Although the context of poverty generally determines what is possible for schools to achieve, this context is by no means consistent. Not all schools located in poor areas offer poor education. And, in themselves, unfavourable contexts do not necessarily generate educational failure. This article captures the diversity of effects generated by poverty at the school level, and the variety of responses by schools situated in very similar socioeconomic and cultural contexts. It draws on a study conducted in the state of Minas Gerais, which explored five schools and their corresponding cultures to reveal the diverse effects of poverty at the school level.

Keywords

Poverty Inequality School culture Politics Inclusion Brazil 

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (1996). Inclusion: How do we measure up? Paper presented at the Seminar and Forum on Inclusive Education, April 26, 1996, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. (1987). The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organisation. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of the pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bonal, X., & Tarabini, A. (Eds.) (2010). Ser pobre en la escuela: Habitus de pobreza y condiciones de educabilidad [Being poor at school: Poverty, habitus, and conditions of educability]. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.Google Scholar
  5. Colclough, C. (2012). Education, poverty and development: Mapping their interconnections. Comparative Education, 48(2), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalben, A. I. (2000). Avaliaçao da implementaçao de Projeto Político-Pedagógico Escola Plural [Evaluation of Escola Plural Project implementation]. In A. Dalben (Ed.), Singular o plural: Eis a escola em questao. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Educaçao, & Grupo de Avaliaçai e Medidas Educacionais.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, R. (1989). The state and education policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dale, R. (2010). The dark side of the whiteboard: Education, poverty, inequalities and social exclusion. Paper for distribution at the Belgian EU Presidency Conference on Education and Social Inclusion, September 28–29, 2010, Ghent.Google Scholar
  9. Duarte, V. C. (2004). Capacitaçao Docente em Minas Gerais e Sao Paolo: Uma análise comparativa [Teacher training in Minas Gerais and Sao Paolo: A comparative analysis]. Cuadernos de Pesquisa, 34(121), 139–168.Google Scholar
  10. Dunne, M., & Gazeley, L. (2008). Teachers, social class and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freitas, L. C. (2007). Eliminaçao adiada: O caso das classes populares no interior da escola e a ocultaçao da (má) qualidade do ensino comparativa [Deferred elimination: The twilight of the popular classes within schools and the concealing of the (poor) quality of teaching]. Educação e Sociedade, 28(100), 965–987.Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  13. INEP [Instituto Nactional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educationais Ansio Teixeira] (2014). Indice de Desenvolvimento da Educaçao Básica [Index of basic education quality]. Brasilia: INEP. http://ideb.inep.gov.br/.
  14. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lupton, R. (2004). Schools in disadvantaged areas: Recognising context and raising quality. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) paper 76. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, K., & Baker, J. (2005). Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3, 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Preston, J., & Green, A. (2003). The macro-social benefits of education, training and skills in comparative perspective. London: Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Redondo, P. (2004). Escuelas y pobreza: Entre el desasosiego y la obstinación [Schools and poverty: Between discomfort and stubbornness]. Buenos Airs: Paidós.Google Scholar
  19. Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fullfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(3), 257–301.Google Scholar
  20. SIMAVE [Sistema Miniero de Avaliação da Educação Pública] (2014). Organisational website. http://www.simave.caedufjf.net/proeb/resultadosescala/.
  21. Tickly, L. (2011). Towards a framework for researching the quality of education in low-income countries. Comparative Education, 47(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.School of Education, College of Social SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations