Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE)
- 2.1k Downloads
Despite the long-standing interest in educational technology reforms, many researchers have found that it is difficult to incorporate advanced information and communications technologies (ICT) in classrooms. Many ICT projects, particularly in the developing world, are limited by the lack of integration between pedagogy and technology. This article presents a framework for integrating ICT technology and inquiry-based pedagogies in classroom settings: the Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). It then outlines findings from a series of studies that tested SMILE’s effectiveness in various country contexts. SMILE successfully spurs student questioning and changes student-teacher dynamics in class. On the other hand, school and country contexts influence students’ initial abilities to form deep inquiries, and SMILE is more difficult to implement in areas where rote memorization pedagogies are typical. The authors advocate further research on the effect of long-term interventions.
KeywordsMobile devices Mobile phones Technology ICT Student-inquiry Student-centered pedagogy
- Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
- Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
- Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Dodds, R., & Mason, C. Y. (2005). Cell phones and PDAs hit K-6. Education Digest, 70(8), 52–53.Google Scholar
- Kelley, A. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 107–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mosteller, F. (1989). The “muddiest point in the lecture” as a feedback device. On Teaching and Learning: The Journal of the Harvard-Danforth Center, 3, 10–21.Google Scholar
- Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Pea, R. D., & Maldonado, H. (2006). WILD for learning: Interacting through new computing devices anytime, anywhere. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 427–442). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pietrzyk, C., Semich, G., Graham, J., & Cellante, D. (2011). Mobile technology in education. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 640–650). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
- Plomp, T. (2009). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 9–36). Amsterdam: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
- Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schuler, C. (2012). iLearn: An analysis of the education category Apple’s app store. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
- Seol, S., Sharp, A., & Kim, P. (2011). Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE): Using mobile phones to promote student inquiries in the elementary classroom. http://gse-it.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/worldcomp11_SMILE.pdf.
- Shah, N. (2011). A blurry vision: Reconsidering the failure of the One Laptop Per Child Initiative. WR, 3, 89. http://www.bu.edu/writingprogram/files/2011/10/Shah1011.pdf.
- Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.) (2006). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Warschauer, M. (2012, spring). The digital divide and social inclusion. Americas Quarterly. http://www.americasquarterly.org/warschauer.
- Warschauer, M., & Ames, M. (2010). Can One Laptop per Child save the world? Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
- Willoughby, K. (1990). Introduction: The concept of technology choice. In K. Willoughby (Ed.), Technology choice: A critique of the appropriate technology movement (pp. 3–14). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar