Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

School-based management committees in low-income countries: Can they improve service delivery?

  • Viewpoints/ Controversies
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the advent of school-based management, citizen committees in low-income countries or areas are often expected to oversee the functioning of schools, health centres, and other community resources. However, studies of their effectiveness show mixed results. Though members of such committees may be able to repair buildings, they often cannot monitor the quality of instruction or of medical services. This article draws on psychological research to predict the performance of such committees, given their levels of education, group dynamics, and complexity of decisions. The research suggests that committees of the very poor may lack the time and resources to make good decisions; they also lack the experience with quality schools to accurately evaluate service delivery. Thus, donors and governments must understand better the decision-making dilemmas of people with limited literacy. Targeted research may clarify the chains of causality leading from management committee decisions to service delivery and may help improve services to the poor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadzi, H. (2006). Adult illiteracy, brain architecture, and empowerment of the poor. Adult Education and Development, 65, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abadzi, H. (2007). Instructional time loss and local-level governance. Prospects, 37(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonowicz, L., Lesné, F., Stassen, S., & Wood, J. (2010). Africa education watch: Good governance lessons for primary education. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., & Mendonza, V. U. (2000). Learning to read is much more than learning to read: A neuropsychologically based reading program. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban, R., & Rao, V. (2009). Is deliberation equitable? Evidence from transcripts of village meetings in South India. Policy research working paper 4928. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Banerjee, A. V., Banerji, R., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Khemani, S. (2008). Pitfalls of participatory programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in India. Policy research working paper 4584. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H. A., & Santibañez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools: The theory and evidence of school-based management. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2005a). Participatory democracy in action: Survey evidence from India. Journal of European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 648–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., Pande, R., & Rao, V. (2005b). Political selection and the quality of government: Evidence from South India. Working paper 921. New Haven, CT: Economic Growth Center, Yale University.

  • Björkman, M., & Svensson, J. (2007). Power to the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment of a community-based monitoring project in Uganda. Working paper WPS4268. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Boak, E. (2009). Study on governance challenges for education in fragile situations. Paris: Euro-Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (2001). Community partnerships in education: Dimensions, variations, and implications. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. P. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. J. (2002). Autonomy and self-management: Concepts and evidence. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management (pp. 34–48). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S., Bista, M. B., & Agergaard, J. (2006). “Empowering” the “local” through education? Exploring community-managed schooling in Nepal. Oxford Review of Education, 33(5), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contte, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (1997). Redundant systems influences on performance. Human Performance, 10(4), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corriveau, K. H., Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Going with the flow: Preschoolers prefer nondissenters as informants. Psychological Science, 20(3), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, B., Narayan, A., & Skoufias, E. (2009). Measuring the quality of education and health services: The use of perception data from Indonesia. Policy research working paper 5033. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2008). Peer effects, pupil-teacher ratios, and teacher incentives: Evidence from a randomization evaluation in Kenya. Unpublished manuscript. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (JPAL), Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  • Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2012). School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil-teacher ratios: Experimental evidence from Kenyan primary schools. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Working paper series no. 12-07. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L. (1982). Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47, 797–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, S. M., Mars, R. B., Gladwin, T. E., & Haggard, P. (2009). When the brain changes its mind: Flexibility of action selection in instructed and free choices. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 2352–2360. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, S. M., Thomas, C. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain. PNAS, 107(13), 6005–6009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrenya, W. K., Wang, Y.-E., & Latané, B. (1985). Social loafing on an optimizing task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P., Patrinos, H., & Rubio-Godina, M. (2008). Empowering parents to improve education: Evidence from rural Mexico. Policy research working paper 3935. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2002). Bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Neuroeconomics: Decision-making and the brain. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N., Sundie, J., Mortensen, C., Cialdini, R., & Kenrick, D. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 384–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, L. V., Orazem, P., Sanchez, M., & Verdisco, A. (2004). Does local school control raise student outcomes? Theory and evidence on the roles of school autonomy and community participation. Working paper 04005. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Hobley, M., & Paudayal, B. (2008). Study of income-generating activities in Kapilavastu and Ramechhap Districts, Nepal. Kathmandu: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, M., & Rabbie, J. M. (1982). Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 241–274). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEG [Independent Evaluation Group] (2010). Project performance assessment report. Nepal: Community Schools Support Project (Cr. 3808). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. (2005). Who participates in school councils and how? A case study of elementary schools in Sargodha District, Punjab, Pakistan. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Education.

  • Khan, F. (2007). School management councils: A lever for mobilizing social capital in rural Punjab, Pakistan? Prospects, 37(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klucharev, V., Hytönen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernández, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 61(1), 140–151. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Wang, X.-J. (2009). Mechanisms for stochastic decision making in the primate frontal cortex: Single-neuron recording and circuit modeling. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision-making and the Brain (pp. 481–501). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. M. (1998). Small groups. In J. D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 441–469). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C., Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & McLean, I. (2007). Deliberation, single-peakedness, and the possibility of meaningful democracy: Evidence from deliberative polls. London: Department of Government, London School of Economics. http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/2007/meaningful-democracy.pdf.

  • Lugaz, C. (2008). Participation des communautés et accès à l’éducation des groupes défavorisés [Community participation and access to marginalized groups]. Paper presented at Directions in Educational Planning: Symposium to Honour the Work of Françoise Caillods, Paris, July 3–4, 2008. http://www.iiep.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Research_Challenges_and_Trends/pdf/symposium/CLugaz.pdf.

  • Lugaz, C., & De Grauwe, A. (2006). École et décentralisation: Résultats d’une recherche en Afrique francophone de l’Ouest. [School and decentralization: Results from research in West Francophone Africa]. Paris: UNESCO IIEP.

  • Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community based (and driven) development: A critical review. Policy research working paper 3209. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Marshall, J. A. R., Bogacz, R., Dornhaus, A., Planqué, R., Kovacs, T., & Franks, N. R. (2009). On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies. Journal of the Royal Society, 6(40), 1065–1074. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martirossian, J. (2001). Decision making in communities: Why groups of smart people sometimes make bad decisions. Falls Church, VA: Community Associations Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N. F. (2001). International and national trends in local governance of education. Educational studies and documents no. 70. Paris: UNESCO.

  • McGinn, N. F. (2002). International and national trends in local governance of education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. (1983). An ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Era (2008). Baseline and follow-up surveys for Nepal community-managed schools impact evaluation. Kathmandu: New Era.

    Google Scholar 

  • OED [Operations Evaluation Department] (2001). Performance audit reports: Hill Community Forestry Project (Credit 2028-NEP), Second Forestry Project (Credit 1400-NEP). Independent Evaluation Group, report no. 22438. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • OED [Operations Evaluation Department] (2005). The effectiveness of World Bank support for community-based and -driven development: An OED evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • OED [Operations Evaluation Department] (2008). Mozambique: Education and Manpower Development Project (Credit 1907), Second Education Project (Credit 2200), Capacity Building Human Resources Development Project (Credit 2436), Education Sector Strategic Program Project (Credit 3172). Project performance assessment report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, N. (2010, August 9). In keeping schools honest, parents get an F. The Jakarta Globe. http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/education/in-keeping-schools-honest-parents-get-an-f/390308.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organizations. California Management Review, 40(2), 98–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, M., Suryadarma, D., Beatty, A., Wong, M., Alishjabana, A, Arya Gaduh, A., et al. (2011). Improving educational quality through enhancing community participation: Results from a randomised field experiment in Indonesia. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1862143.

  • Purcell, B. A., Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Logan, G. D., Schall, J. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2009). Neurally-constrained modeling of perceptual decision-making. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1113–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V., & Sanyal, P. (2009). Political culture of poverty and deliberation in rural India: The discursive landscape of village democracy. New Delhi: Accountability Initiative, Centre for Policy Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F. (1997). The role of NGOs in promoting educational innovation: A case study in Latin America. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Education and development: Tradition and innovation (Vol. 4, pp. 33–44). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinikka, R., & Smith, N. (2004). Public expenditure tracking surveys in education. Paris: UNESCO IIEP. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136267e.pdf.

  • Rivarola, M., & Fuller, B. (1999). Nicaragua’s experiment to decentralise schools: Contrasting views of parents, teachers and directors. Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 489–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. J. H., Smith, F. D., Sullivan, K. M. E., & Franks, N. R. (2009, April 22). Do ants make direct comparisons? Proceedings of the Royal Society B. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0350.

  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Suss, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., Visscher, P. K., & Passino, K. M. (2006). Group decision making in honey bee swarms. American Scientist, 94, 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaeffer, S. (1992). A conceptual framework for collaboration in educational change. In S. Shaeffer (Ed.), Collaborating for educational change: The role of teachers, parents and the community in school improvement (pp. 3–36). Paris: UNESCO IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIGP [School Improvement Grants Program] (2002). Community participation in the Scholarship and Grants Program (SGP) and School Improvement Grants Program. Jakarta: World Bank Country Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift-Morgan, J. (2009, March 23). Is good governance rational? Critical questions about post-bureaucratic education system reforms. Paper presented at Comparative and International Education Society conference, Charleston, SC.

  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theunynck, S. (2010). School construction strategies for universal primary education in Africa: Should communities be empowered to build their schools? Africa human development series, no. 48898. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Tsang, E. P. K. (2008). Computational intelligence determines effective rationality. International Journal on Automation and Control, 5(1), 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2007). Educational governance at local level: Policy papers and evaluation guidelines. Paris: UNESCO Division for the Promotion of Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID [United States Agency for International Development] (2008a). The midterm evaluation of USAID/Indonesia’s Decentralized Basic Education (DBE) Project. ABE-BE IQC Final Report. Washington, DC: The Mitchell Group.

  • USAID [United States Agency for International Development] (2008b). More effective decentralized education management and governance. Monitoring progress report 4. Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute.

  • World Bank (1996). Nepal Earthquake Schools Rehabilitation Project (Cr. 2048) implementation completion report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004). World development report: Making services work for poor people. New York: Oxford University for the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007). Guiding principles for implementing school-based management programs. Washington, DC: World Bank Human Development Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2008). Programa Hondureño de Educación Comunitaria, Honduran Program of Community Education. PROHECO Implementation Completion Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • World Bank (2013). Data. How we classify countries. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Partnership for Education, c/o World Bank, Washington, DC, USA

    Helen Abadzi

Authors
  1. Helen Abadzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Abadzi.

About this article

Cite this article

Abadzi, H. School-based management committees in low-income countries: Can they improve service delivery?. Prospects 43, 115–132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9267-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9267-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation