PROSPECTS

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 375–392 | Cite as

School inspection and supervision in Pakistan: Approaches and issues

Open File

Abstract

This article traces how the concept of educational inspection has evolved in Pakistan, especially in the province of Sindh, and discusses whether the existing inspection system helps to improve quality and establish accountability. The inspection system that originated in colonial days has evolved to incorporate the notion of using supervision to provide a range of support to school-based efforts to improve performance. The shift, however, has been in terminology only, since it has not signalled a major shift in how the job is carried out in practice. The article argues that as a strategy for establishing accountability and improving quality in education, inspection and supervision rely on several interdependent variables. Improvements in educational quality will require a balance among three factors: the availability of relevant and adequate physical, human, and financial resources; effective and empowered leadership; and functional monitoring, evaluation, and professional support for schools.

Keywords

Accountability Inspection Quality of education Pakistan Supervision 

References

  1. Adams, D. (2007). Implementing and sustaining educational reforms: The case for little “r”. Prospects, 37(4), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AEPAM NEMIS [Academy of Educational Planning and Management, National Education Management Information System] (2006–2007). Pakistan education statistics. Islamabad: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Ali, M. A. (1998). Supervision for teacher development: A proposal for Pakistan. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  4. Aziz, M. A. (1965). The educational pyramid re-invented. Lahore: Publishers United Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, A. M. (2005). Teacher accountability in context: Tanzanian primary school teachers’ perceptions of local community and education administration. Compare, 35(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
  6. Bhutto, G. R. (1978). A handbook on supervision for primary schools in Sindh. Hyderabad: Bureau of Curriculum and Extension Wing.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, T., & West-Burnham, J. (Eds.). (1994). The principles of educational management. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, D., & Adams, D. (2002). The quality of education: Dimensions and strategies. Hong Kong: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Eraut, M. (1993). Teacher accountability: Why is it central in teacher professional development? In L. Kremer-Hayon, H. C. Vonk, & R. Fessler (Eds.), Teacher professional development: A multiple perspective approach. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  10. Govinda, R., & Tapan, S. (1999). Quality education through school-based supervision and support: The case of GSS primary schools in Bangladesh. Working document. Trends in school supervision series. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  11. Grauwe, A. D., & Naidoo, J. P. (Eds.). (2004). School evaluation for quality improvement. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  12. Gurr, D. (1999). From supervision to quality assurance: The case study of the state of Victoria (Australia). Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  13. Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jaffer, K. (2007). An analysis of the school inspection system in Sindh, Pakistan. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  15. Jamil, B. R. (2002). Decentralization and devolution: Educational implications of the Praetorian interpretation. Lahore: Idara-e-Taleem-o-Agahi Public Trust.Google Scholar
  16. Kenya Ministry of Education, Science, Technology (2000). Handbook for inspection of educational institutions. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.Google Scholar
  17. Leithwood, K. A., Edge, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Educational accountability: The state of the art. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Leung, C. K. L. (2005). Accountability versus school development: Self-evaluation in an international school in Hong Kong. International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(1), 2–14.Google Scholar
  19. London, N. A. (2004). School inspection, the inspectorate and educational practice in Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacBeath, J. (2008). Leading learning in the self-evaluating school. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 28(4), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacBeath, J., & McGlynn, A. (2002). Self-evaluation: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  22. Memon, M. (2001). Review of the management of schools education in Sindh. A consultancy report for Sindh elementary education sector reform. Karachi: Education Department, Government of Sindh.Google Scholar
  23. Memon, M., Shah, N., & Kazi, Z. H. (2002). Decentralization of education system in Sindh: A critical review. Paper presented at the Research and Policy Dialogues on Key Issues in Education: Decentralization, July 10–12, 2002, Islamabad.Google Scholar
  24. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1959). Report of the Commission on National Education. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  25. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1969). National educational policy and implementation programme. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  26. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1970). The new education policy of the government of Pakistan, March 1970. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  27. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1972). The education policy 1972–1980. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  28. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1978). Development of education in Pakistan (1978–1980). Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  29. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1992). National education policy ‘92 (1992–2002). Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  30. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1998a). National educational policy 1998–2010. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  31. MoE [Ministry of Education] (1998b). Ninth five-year planning issue paper 1998–2003. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  32. MoE [Ministry of Education] (2007). Green paper on national education policy review. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  33. MoE [Ministry of Education] (2009). National education policy 2009. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  34. Nias, J. (1990). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Osborn, M., McNess, E., & Broadfoot, P. (2000). What teachers do: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. Perera, W. J. (1997). Changing schools from within: A management intervention for improving school functioning in Sri Lanka. Trends in school supervision series. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  37. Power, S., Halpin, D., & Whitty, G. (1997). Managing the state and the market: “New” education management in five countries. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(4), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rudd, P., & Davies, D. (2000). Evaluating school self-evaluation. Paper presented at the British educational research association conference, Cardiff University. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001641.htm.
  39. Scott, P. (1989). Accountability, responsiveness and responsibility. In R. Glatter (Ed.), Educational institutions and their environments: Managing the boundaries. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. SEMIS [Sindh Education Management Information System] (2004–2005). Sindh Education Profile 2004–2005. Karachi: Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh.Google Scholar
  41. Sheikh, A. Q. (2000). Feasibility study report on review of present system and implications of elementary education. Karachi: Education Department, Government of Sindh.Google Scholar
  42. Siddiqui, H. (1987). Education in Sindh: Past and present. Hyderabad: Institute of Sindhology, University of Sindh.Google Scholar
  43. Sindh lifts ban on jobs (2004, October 21). Dawn, p. 1. http://www.dawn.com/2004/10/21/top10.htm.
  44. UNESCO (2005). Education for All: The quality imperative. Global Monitoring Report 2005. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, J. K. P. (1994). School inspectors and supervision. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  46. Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wilcox, B. (2000). Making school inspection visits more effective: The English experience. Working document. Trends in school supervision series. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  48. Winkler, D., & Hatfield, R. (2002). The devolution of education in Pakistan. In IED [Institute for Educational Development] (Ed.), Research and policy dialogues on key issues in education: Decentralization. Islamabad: IED. http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/Feb2004Course/Background%20materials/Winkler2.doc.
  49. Wanzare, Z. O. (n.d.). Rethinking school inspection in the Third World: The case of Kenya. http://www.ualberta.ca/~ckreber/papers/zak.htm.

Copyright information

© UNESCO IBE 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Educational DevelopmentAga Khan UniversityNorth Nazimabad, KarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations