Skip to main content
Log in

Catalyzing country ownership and aid effectiveness: Role of the Education for All-Fast Track Initiative Catalytic Fund

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the contribution of the Education for All-Fast Track Initiative (EFA-FTI) global partnership in strengthening aid effectiveness in the education sector, and specifically how the implementation modalities of the EFA-FTI Catalytic Fund (CF) have contributed to this strengthening. The empirical findings are based on a review covering the period 2005–2007, when the CF grant was first established. The review includes an assessment of the quality of the education sector plans for 25 countries in the partnership, the implementation modalities of the CF grant in 18 countries, and feedback from countries’ participants. The qualitative assessment of the CF implementation modalities is based on three areas—alignment, harmonization, and managing for results—and uses a good practice checklist based on the Paris Declaration partnership commitments. Progress on the good practice checklist in the education sector is compared to progress at the country level as a whole; the latter is derived from the Aid Effectiveness Profiles prepared by the World Bank. The review of the sample countries finds that in the education sector, alignment was stronger than at the country level, progress toward harmonization was somewhat stronger, and managing for results was the same as at the country level. The article concludes that while the FTI has contributed to improving aid effectiveness, moving forward requires different actions at the two levels—global and country level—on which the partnership operates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The two workshops were organized by the World Bank using the Education Program Development Fund of the FTI in July and December 2007, in Cape Town and Tunis, respectively. Delegations from 13 countries from Sub-Saharan Africa and local donor representatives participated in the two workshops. The author was the lead organizer and reviewed and provided inputs for the papers and presentations. The presentation “Operational approaches to CF grant implementation: Moving towards greater aid effectiveness”, on which this paper draws, was given by the author, in Tunis. Filippo Cavassini did the background work for this presentation.

  2. Seven countries had been implementing a CF grant for 2 years or more. They are Ghana, Guyana, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritania, Niger, and The Gambia. The reference date is the date of the CF grant letter agreement transmitted to the recipient country by the Bank’s country director.

  3. The assessment of Madagascar pertains to the situation in 2007, which continued in 2008 leading to the joint donor endorsement of a new EFA plan. A new CF grant was approved by the FTI’s CF Committee in April 2008 to be implemented by early 2009. However, the situation with respect to the education sector plan and its implementation, as well as the country’s development plan, has changed since early 2009, following the political changes in the country and the suspension of aid by many development partners.

References

  • Ayyar, R. V. V. (2007). Organizing to take leadership: The experience of India. Draft discussion paper. Second regional capacity development workshop for education for all: Country leadership and implementation for results in the EFA-FTI partnership, Tunis, Tunisia.

  • Bashir, S. (2007). Operational approaches to catalytic fund implementation: Moving toward greater aid effectiveness. Powerpoint presentation. Second regional capacity development workshop for education for all: Country leadership and implementation for results in the EFA-FTI partnership, Tunis, Tunisia.

  • Bellew, R. (2007). Quality of education sector plans to achieve universal quality primary education. Draft discussion paper. Second regional capacity development workshop for education for all: Country leadership and implementation for results in the EFA-FTI partnership, Tunis, Tunisia.

  • Entwistle, J., Cavassini, F., & Morrow, D. (2007). Results-based national development strategies: Assessment and challenges ahead. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast Track Initiative Secretariat. (2006). FTI catalytic fund operational guidelines. http://www.education-fast-track.org/library/CFoperationalguidelines.pdf.

  • OECD DAC. (2008). Effective aid by 2010? What it will take. Survey on monitoring the Paris declaration. The Development Assistance Committee. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/44/41202160.pdf.

  • UNESCO (2000) The Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. Adopted by the World Education Forum, Dakar, Senegal. 26–28 April, 2000. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001211/121147e.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajitha Bashir.

Additional information

Note

Views expressed in this article are those of the author and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Executive Directors or the countries they represent.

About this article

Cite this article

Bashir, S. Catalyzing country ownership and aid effectiveness: Role of the Education for All-Fast Track Initiative Catalytic Fund. Prospects 39, 147–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9122-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9122-1

Keywords

Navigation