Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Altering the model: the challenge of achieving inclusion

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides “inclusion” meaning incorporation within the education system, there is also “inclusion” signifying the incorporation of knowledge, two distinct processes which went hand-in-hand to start with but which, as education systems expanded, have begun to drift apart. While the population as a whole, including the more deprived sectors, has improved its educational level over past decades, in more recent times there has been little to show for the considerable efforts made. It is as if the process had reached a ceiling, owing to practices of educational marginalization that are so embedded that they perpetually recreate themselves. The education system has lost its bearings because a new approach is needed with the emergence of the information and communication society, which implies a new definition of knowledge, cut off from its origins. The idea of “including” must also be a key notion in relation to the search for a fairer, more democratic society. This implies developing a number of viewpoints or fundamental attitudes when we consider inclusive education. There is the ideological/political point of view—which means developing the ideal of justice and democracy within the framework of education as a right; the epistemological aspect—which entails supporting the new educational approach in the very latest developments of the theory of complexity; the pedagogical aspect—which entails adopting the advances made in the new learning sciences in order to develop a new “technology of educational production” (didactics) that will guarantee the entire population’s ability to reason; and the institutional point of view—which requires reviewing the notion of a “school system” and incorporating other institutional spaces by considering the whole of society as offering potential “learning environments”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As an example, in the period between the Battle of Waterloo and 1834 (when the Poor Law Amendment Law was passed), welfare expenditure in England and Wales accounted for approximately 80% of the revenues derived from local taxes (Gordon 1995).

  2. In 1833 England witnessed the creation of municipalities (Municipal Corporations Act, 1935), the abolition of slavery, the introduction of state education and the Factory Act. In 1834, the New Poor Law was passed.

  3. In 1796, Bentham wrote “Poverty is the state of everyone who, in order to obtain subsistence, is forced to have recourse to labour. Indigence is the state of him who, being destitute of property […] is at the same time, either unable to labour, or unable, even for labour, to procure the supply of which he happens to be in want” (Himmelfarb 1988, pp. 96–99).

  4. In the more developed societies the goal at present is to incorporate more students not just in secondary school but also in tertiary education.

  5. This form of marginalization is usually known as dropout. It is interesting to note that this term has never been queried. It should have been, considering that it presupposes that the blame for not receiving education rests on the pupil (who “drops out”) or on the pupil’s family (who cause the youngster to “drop out”), thus pretending that expulsion is the structural cause of the problem.

  6. This “label” is in fact a way of shifting responsibility for the inability of the school system to develop teaching technologies that are appropriate for them on to the poorer sectors.

  7. The emergence of schools for children with “slight mental retardation” within the differential education system dates back to this time.

  8. The World Bank estimates that the G-8 and the rest of the international community need to invest approximately US$ 3 billion a year of additional finance over the next 10 years in order to help all low-income developing countries to reach the educational goal of the MDGs and not to leave a single child deprived of quality primary education. At the World Education Forum in Dakar in 2000, the World Bank and other donors promised that no country that had a viable and sustainable plan to achieve the goal of Education for All would fail to do so because of a lack of resources.

  9. Reflected in phenomena such as cloning, or in the possibility now for Internet users to generate knowledge and make it available to everyone over the web.

  10. Toronto Schooling for Tomorrow Forum, June 2004 (www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3343,en_2649_39263231_31532732_1_1_1_1,00.html).

  11. This concept is being developed in the Alternative Models of Learning (AML) project, within the framework of OECD-CERI Schooling for Tomorrow.

  12. Sotolongo and Delgado mention other aspects such as: global bioethics, environmental holism and new epistemology.

  13. OCDE-CERI, Schooling for Tomorrow Project. (www.oecd.org/document/33/0,3343,en_2649_35845581_38981601_1_1_1_1,00.html).

References

  • Aguerrondo, I. (1993). Escuela, fracaso y pobreza: Cómo salir del círculo vicioso [Breaking the vicious circle of school, failure and poverty]. Washington, DC: INTERAMER/OEA.

  • Archer, M. S. (1984). Social origins of educational systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, R. (2007). Eficacia escolar desde el enfoque de calidad de la educación [Efficiency of schooling from the point of view of the quality of education]. Paper presented at the Primer Congreso Iberoamericano de Eficacia Escolar y Factores Asociados, OREALC/UNESCO, Santiago, Chile, December.

  • Braslavsky, C. (1985). La discriminación educativa en la Argentina [Educational discrimination in Argentina]. Buenos Aires: FLACSO/GEL.

  • Brunner, J. J. (2000). Educación y escenarios del futuro: Nuevas tecnologías y sociedad de la información [Education and scenarios of the future: New technologies and the information society]. Santiago: PREAL. (Documento de trabajo, nº 16).

  • Castel, R. (1999). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale [The metamorphosis of the social question]. Paris: Gallimard.

  • CEPAL/UNESCO. (1992). Educación y conocimiento: Eje de la transformación productiva con equidad [Education and knowledge: The key to productive change with equity]. Santiago: CEPAL. (Libros de la CEPAL, nº33, LC/G.1702/Rev.2-P).

  • Denis, B. (2006). La participation politique, crise ou mutation? [Political participation: Crisis or mutation?]. Paris: La Documentation Française.

  • Dubet, F. (2002). Le déclin de l’institution [The decline of institutions]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

  • Dubet, F. (2004, November 24–25). ¿Mutaciones institucionales y/o neoliberalismo? [Institucional change and/or neoliberalism?]. Conferencia inaugural, Seminario Internacional sobre ‘Gobernabilidad de los sistemas educativos en América Latina’, IIEP/UNESCO, Buenos Aires.

  • Elmore, R. (1990). La reestructuración de las escuelas: La siguiente generación de la reforma educativa [The restructuring of schools: The next generation of educational reform]. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  • García Huidobro, J. E. (2001). Conflictos y alianzas en las reformas educativas: Siete tesis basadas en la experiencia chilena [Conflicts and alliances in educational reforms: Seven theories based on the Chilean experience]. In S. Martinic & G. Pardo (Eds.), Economía política de las reformas educativas en América Latina. Santiago: PREL/CIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (1995). Historia y filosofía de las ciencias sociales [History and philosophy of the social sciences]. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.

  • Himmelfarb, G. (1988). La idea de la pobreza: Inglaterra a principios de la era industrial [The idea of poverty: England at the start of the industrial age]. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  • Labarca, G. 1995. ¿Cuánto se puede gastar en educación? [How much can be spent on education?]. Revista de la CEPAL, no. 56.

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir [The post-modern condition: Report on knowledge]. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Alternative models of learning: Building on insights from recent OECD/CERI analyses. Paris: OECD/CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Center for Educational Research, Innovation. (2007). Schooling for tomorrow: Alternative models of learning (AML). Paris: OECD/CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefelbein, E., & Tedesco, J. C. (1995). Una nueva oportunidad: El rol de la educación en el desarrollo de América Latina [A new opportunity: The role of education in the development of Latin America]. Buenos Aires: Santillana.

  • Sliwka, A. (2008, May 15–16). The contribution of alternative education. Paper prepared for the conference on ‘Learning in the 21st Century: Research, innovation and policy’, OECD, Paris.

  • Sotolongo Codina, P., & Delgado Díaz, C. (2006). La revolución contemporánea del saber y la complejidad social: Hacia unas ciencias sociales de nuevo tipo [The contemporary revolution of knowledge and social complexity: Towards social sciences of a new kind]. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Optimizing learning: Implications of learning sciences research. In: OECD/CERI (Eds.) Focus in learning: Searching for alternatives. Paris: OECD/CERI.

  • Tishman, S., Perkins, D., Jay, H. (1994). The thinking classroom: Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Torres, R.M. (2007). Educación para todos y plan iberoamericano: Una visión y un plan integrados de educación básica de jóvenes y adultos [Education for all and the Ibero-American plan: An integrated vision and plan for the basic education of young people and adults]. Quito: Instituto Fronesis. www.fronesis.org.

  • UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Latin American and the Caribbean (OREALC). (1980–2000). Bulletin of the Major Project of Education, 1980–2000.UNESCO-OREALC.

  • Weinberg, G. (1984). Modelos educativos en la historia de América Latina [Educational models in the history of Latin America]. Buenos Aires: Kapelusz.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inés Aguerrondo.

Additional information

Original language: Spanish.

About this article

Cite this article

Aguerrondo, I. Altering the model: the challenge of achieving inclusion. Prospects 38, 47–63 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9059-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9059-9

Keywords

Navigation