Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rethinking governance from the bottom up: the case of Muslim students in Dutch universities

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of a study of faculty and university staff at two major universities in the Netherlands: the University of Amsterdam and the Free University of Amsterdam. I sought to understand how faculty viewed the role of the university in relationship to national and European goals promoting social cohesion and the integration of Islamic minorities in Dutch society. To a person, my informants were convinced that European universities did not, and should not, play a major role in promoting social cohesion. Some faculty members were merely indifferent to the problem and the university’s role; others were actively hostile to the idea that the university should address what was clearly, in their minds, a state political problem. The paper discusses the governance implications of promoting social cohesion within these challenging institutional contexts, by building social networks among students and reinterpreting traditional policies of pillarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. H. (2006). The caged virgin: An emancipation proclamation for Women and Islam. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F. H. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 64, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, A. L. (2004). When does race matter in college friendships? Exploring men’s diverse and homogeneous friendship groups. Review of Higher Education, 27, 553–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawer, B. (2006). While Europe slept: How radical Islam is destroying the West from within. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlinski, C. (2006). Menace in Europe: Why the continent’s crisis is America’s, too. London: Crown Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buruma, I. (2006). Murder in Amsterdam: The death of Theo van Gogh and the limits of tolerance. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1998). The public good as a social and cultural project. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), Private action and the public good. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capshaw, N. C. (2005). The social cohesion role of the public sector. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75, 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1987). Norms as social capital. In G. Radmitzky & P. Bernholz (Eds.), Economic imperialism (pp. 133–55). New York: Pergon Press.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe, European Committee for Social Cohesion. (2004). Revised Strategy for Social Cohesion. Issued at Strasbourg, France, April 27, 2004.

  • Crul, M., & Doomernik, J. (2003). The Turkish and Moroccan second generation in The Netherlands: Divergent trends between and polarization within the two groups. International Migration Review, 37, 1039–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreeben, R. (1967). The contribution of schooling to the learning of social norms. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, G. (2000). The limits of educational policy and practice? The case of ethnic minorities in The Netherlands. Comparative Education, 36, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893 [1997]). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.

  • Durkheim, E. (1897 [1982]). Suicide. New York: Free Press.

  • European Commission. (2004). A new partnership for cohesion: Convergence, competitiveness, cooperation. Luxembourg: EC Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (2005). The European Higher Education Area: Achieving the Goals. Communique of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bergen, Norway, May 19–20, 2005.

  • Festinger, L., et al. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. A. (1996). Mapping interactions within and between cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 18, 93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K. A., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1998). Linking action to social structure within a system: Social capital within and between subgroups. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 642–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006). Identity, immigration, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 17(2), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M., & Justman, M. (2002). Education, social cohesion, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 92, 1192–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A., & Preston, J. (2001). Education and social cohesion: Recentering the debate. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 247–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V., Phalet, K., & ter Wal, J. (2005). Monitoring ethnic minorities in The Netherlands. International Social Science Journal, 57, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helly, D. (2003). Social cohesion and cultural plurality. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P. (2000). From the party/state to multiethnic democracy: Education and social cohesion in Europe and Central Asia. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P. (2003). Education, social cohesion, and the future role of international organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 78, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. British Journal of Sociology, 55, 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R. (2004). Migrant mobilization and political opportunities: Variation among German cities and a comparison with the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30, 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Challenging the liberal nation-state? Postnationalism, multiculturalism, and the collective claims making of migrants and ethnic minorities in Britain and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 652–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1998). On the contested nature of the public good. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), Private action and the public good. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2002). Cohesion and membership duration: Linking groups, relations and individuals in an ecology of affiliation. Advances in Group Processes, 19, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moiseyenko, O. (2005). Education and social cohesion: Higher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S., & Al-Amin, J. (2006). Creating identity-safe spaces on college campuses for Muslim students. Change, 38(2), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2005). The social dimension and social cohesion. Or, on reconciling Adam Smith with Thomas Hobbes. Paper presented to The Social Dimension of the European Higher Education Area and World Wide Competition. The Sorbonne, Paris, January 26–28, 2005.

  • Panjwani, F. (2005). Agreed syllabi and un-agreed values: Religious education and missed opportunities for fostering social cohesion. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J., Penninx, J., Groenendijk, K., & Meyer, A. (1999). The politics of recognizing religious diversity in Europe: Social reactions to the institutionalization of Islam in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Great Britain. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 35, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijkschroeff, R., ten Dam, G., Duyvendak, J. W., de Gruijter, M., & Pels, T. (2005). Educational policies on migrants and minorities in The Netherlands: Success or failure? Journal of Education Policy, 20, 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statham, P., & Koopmans, R. (2004). Multiculturalism and the challenge of Muslim group demands in Britain, the Netherlands, and Germany. In C. Husband & A. Garrido (Eds.), Comparative European research in migration, diversity and identities. Spain: University of Duesto Press/Humanitarian Net.

  • Statham, P., Koopmans, R., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Resilient or adaptable Islam? Multiculturalism, religion and migrants’ claims-making for group demands in Britain, the Netherlands, and France. Ethnicities, 5, 427–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, B. D. (1999). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? and other conversations about Race. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillie, J. (2004). Social capital of organizations and their members: Explaining the political integration of immigrants in Amsterdam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30, 529–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J., Rossi, U., & Van Houtum, H. (2005). Reinventing multiculturalism: Urban citizenship and the negotiation of ethnic diversity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 622–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ours, J. C., & Vennman, J. (2003). The educational attainment of second-generation immigrants in The Netherlands. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 739–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raalj, B. (2005). Darwin is not the prophet [translated from the Dutch]. De Volkskrant, April 9, 2005.

  • Vedder, P. (2006). Black and white schools in the Netherlands. European Education, 38, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, G. C., & Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in higher education. Working paper, No. DP-64, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education.

  • Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fulbright New Century Scholar programme, U.S. Department of State. Special thanks to CIES, Anna Kroth, and especially my Fulbright colleagues, comrades and collaborators: Stephen Heyneman, Nancy Lesko, and Richard Kraince. The paper, however, is entirely the work of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N. Bastedo.

Additional information

An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the International Forum of the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Anaheim, CA, November 1-2, 2006.

About this article

Cite this article

Bastedo, M.N. Rethinking governance from the bottom up: the case of Muslim students in Dutch universities. Prospects 37, 319–332 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9033-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9033-6

Keywords

Navigation