Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting Participation in Public Life Through Secondary Education: Evidence from Honduras

  • Educational Governance At Local Level
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References and bibliography

  • Alzate A.; Arbab A.; Varcarcel F. 2000. Servicio a la Comunidad Unidad 1: salud, un aspecto de bienestar [Community Service Unit 1: health, an aspect of well-being]. Cali, Colombia: FUNDAEC. [Adapted version published by Asociación Bayan, Honduras.]

  • Arbab H., Correa G. 2001. Evaluation summary. Cali, Colombia: FUNDAEC

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbab F., Correa G., de Valcarcel F. 1988. FUNDAEC: its principles and activities. Cali, Colombia: CELATER

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball S.J. 1998. Big policies/small world: an introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernbaum M., et al. 2004. Estudio de factibilidad para la posible adaptación del Programa Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial (SAT) a Nicaragua [Feasibility study for the possible adaptation of the Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial (SAT) Programme to Nicaragua]. Arlington, VA:␣Youth Net, Family Health International

  • Bray M. 1999. Control of education. issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. in Arnove R., Torres C.A., eds. Comparative education: the dialectic of the global and the local, 2nd ed., pp. 204–228. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns A., et al. 2004. Reaching out-of-school youth with reproductive health and HIV information and services. Arlington, VA: YouthNet Program, Family Health International. [Unpublished mimeo.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois Herrera L.; Vega A.L.; Pavón L.R. 2001. Informe sobre la evaluación del Programa SAT [Report on the SAT Programme Evaluation]. Tegucigalpa: Honduran Ministry of Education. [Unpublished mimeo.]

  • Gershberg A., Jacobs M. 1998. Decentralization and recentralization: lessons from the social sectors in Mexico and Nicaragua. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. (Office of the Chief Economist, Working paper, no. 379.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeyman C. 2004. An orientation toward human progress: developing social responsibility in rural Honduran youth through the Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [Senior Thesis.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Development Bank. 2001. Summary of findings: decentralization and effective citizen participation: six cautionary tales. Washington, DC: IADB, Office of Evaluation and Oversight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer N. 1999. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 435–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan F. 2001. Community participation in school management in developing countries: who participates and how? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. [Qualifying paper.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan F. 2006. Who participates in school councils and how? Prospects, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau A. 1989. Home advantage: social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York, NY: Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Light R., Singer J., Willet J. 1990. By design: planning research on higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclure R. 1994. Misplaced assumptions of decentralization and participation in rural communities: primary school reform in Burkina Faso. Comparative Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn N., Welsh T. 1999. Decentralizaion of education: why, when, what and how? Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell J. 1996. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy-Graham E. 2005. Para Seguir Adelante: women’s empowerment and the Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial (SAT) Program in Honduras. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [Doctoral dissertation.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. 2002. Racial isolation, poverty and the limits of local control as a means for holding public schools accountable. In Motion Magazine, 5 May. Retrieved 14 May 2007 from <http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/er/pnripl1.html>

  • Paqueo V., Lammert J. 2000. Decentralization in education: Q&A for the web/knowledge nugget. Decentralization and School-Based Management Resource Kit. Washington, DC: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, M.; Leal, S.; Arango, P. 2001. Experiencias alternativas para la expansión del acceso a la educación secundaria para los jóvenes en las zonas rurales: el Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial (SAT) y el Modelo de Posprimaria Rural de Escuela Nueva [Alternative experiences for the expansion and access to secondary education for youth in rural areas: the SAT Programme and the Postprimaria Rural Model of Escuela Nueva. (Paper commissioned by the Inter-American Development Bank, Centro de Estudios Regionales Cafeteros y Empresariales (CRECE), Colombia.)

  • Ramírez, R.L. 2003. Sistema de Aprendizaje Tutorial: experiencia innovadora de educación rural en Colombia [System of Tutorial Learning: innovative experience in Colombian rural education]. (Document prepared for the Presentation to the Ministry of Education of Colombia for SECAB.)

  • Rivarola M., Fuller B. 1999. Nicaragua’s experiment to decentralize schools: contrasting views of parents, teachers, and directors. Comparative Education Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 489–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli D.; Cheema B. 1983. Implementing decentralization policies. In: Cheema, B.; Rondinelli, D. eds. Decentralization and development: policy implementation in developing countries. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

  • Stromquist N. 2002. Education in a globalized world: the connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. 2003. Human development report. New York, NY: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. 2005. Decentralization in education. Educational Quality in the Developing World, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas-Reimers, E. 2002. Education for democracy. Revista, Harvard Review of Latin America. Fall. Retrieved 14 May 2007 from <http://drclas.fas.harvard.edu/revista/articles/view/173>

  • Wunsch, J. 1991. Institutional analysis and decentralization: developing an analytic framework for effective Third World administrative reform. Public administration and development, no. 11, pp. 431–451

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Murphy-Graham.

Additional information

Original language: English

Erin Murphy-Graham (United States)

Doctorate in International Education (Ed.D.), Harvard University, 2005. At the Graduate School of Education, University of California Berkeley, she is an adjunct assistant professor and teaches courses on gender and education and globalization and international education. She has worked and conducted research on secondary education and gender issues in Nicaragua, Honduras and Colombia. E-mail: emurphy@berkeley.edu

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy-Graham, E. Promoting Participation in Public Life Through Secondary Education: Evidence from Honduras. Prospects 37, 95–111 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9013-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9013-2

Keywords

Navigation