Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of technical change and TFP growth based on observable technology shifters

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper models and estimates total factor productivity (TFP) growth parametrically. The model is a generalization of the traditional production function model where technology is represented by a time trend. It decomposes TFP growth into an unobservable time trend induced technical change, scale economies and an observable technology shifter index’s components. The empirical results are based on unbalanced panel data at the global level for 190 countries observed over the period 1996–2013. It uses a number of exogenous growth factors in modeling four technology shifter indices to explore development infrastructure, finance, technology and human development determinants of TFP growth. Our results show that unobservable technical change remains the most important component of TFP growth. Our findings also show that technical changes and TFP growth are unexpectedly negative across all country income groups and years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To conserve space, we do not report all the results. These can be obtained from the authors on request.

References

  • Ahn SE, Abt B (2003) Total factor productivity measurement with improved index numbers. In: Moffat SO (ed), Bugs, budgets, mergers, and fire: disturbance economics. Proceedings of the 2003 Southern Forest Economics Workers annual meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, p 287–297.

  • Aigner DJ, Chu SF (1968) On estimating the industry production function. Am Econ Rev 58:826–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61(4):821–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrics 62(6):1383–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106:407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J, Spiegel M (2005) Human capital and technology diffusion. In: Aghion P and Durlauf S (eds), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SM, Bosworth BP (1996) Economic growth in East Asia: accumulation versus assimilation. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:135–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny M, Fuss M, Waverman L (1981) The measurement and interpretation of total factor productivity in regulated industries, with an application to Canadian telecommunications. In: Cowing TG, Stevenson RE (eds) Productivity measurement in regulated industries. Academic Press, New York, NY, p 179–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert WE (1981) The theory of total factor productivity measurement in regulated industries. In: Cowing TG, Stevenson RE (eds) Productivity measurement in regulated industries. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith R, Redding S, Van Reenen J (2000) Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2457. CEPR, London

  • Hansen BE (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter id not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64(2):413–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DJ, Russell RR (2001) Human capital convergence: a production frontier approach. Working Paper. University of California, Riverside

  • Heshmati A, Kumbhakar SC (2011) Technical change and total factor productivity growth: the case of Chinese provinces. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78:575–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati A, Kumbhakar SC (2014) A general model of technical change with an application to the OECD countries. Econ Innov New Technol 23(1):25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson A (2002) Human capital and economic growth: a survey of the empirical literature from 1990 to the present. UNIDO, Mimeo, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson A (2007) Determinants of total factor productivity: a literature review. Research and Statistics Branch Staff Working Paper. 02/2007. UNIDO, Vienna

  • Jones CI (1996) Human capital, ideas, and economic growth. Stanford University, Mimeo, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller R, Stevens P (2006) Frontier technology and absorptive capacity: evidence from OECD manufacturing industries. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 68:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kónya L (2006) Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Econ Model 23:978–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop G, Osiewalski J, Steel MFJ (1999) The components of output growth: a stochastic frontier analysis. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:455–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger J (2003) The global trends of total factor productivity: evidence from the nonparametric Malmquist index approach. Oxf Econ Pap 55:265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos Elastistica 4:209–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien G, Kumbhakar SC, Hardaker JB (2017) Accounting for risk in productivity analysis: an application to Norwegian dairy farming. J Product Anal 47(3):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastromarco C, Zago A (2012) On modeling the determinants of TFP growth. Struct Change Econ Dyn 23(4):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudos J, Pastor JM, Serrano L (2000) Convergence in OECD countries: technical change, efficiency and productivity. Appl Econ 32:757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SM, Upadhyay MP (2000) The effects of openness, trade orientation, and human capital on total factor productivity. J Dev Econ 63:399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SM, Upadhyay MP (2002) Total factor productivity, human capital, and outward orientation: differences by stage of development and geographic regions. University of Nevada, Mimeo, Las Vegas

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience, and earnings. Columbia University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison C (1986) Productivity measurement with non-static expectations and varying capacity utilization: an integrated approach. J Econ 33(1–2):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison C, Siegel DS (1999) Scale economies and industry agglomeration externalities: a dynamic cost function approach. Am Econ Rev 89(1):272–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehru V, Dhareshwar A (1993) A new database on physical capital stock: sources, methodology and results. Rev Anal Econ 8:37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Political Econ 96:S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugcu CT, Tiwari AK (2016) Does renewable and/or non-renewable energy consumption matter for total factor productivity (TFP) growth? Evidence from the BRICS. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 65:610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulku H (2004) R&D, innovation, and economic growth: an empirical analysis. IMF Working Paper. WP/04/185. The International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

  • Vickers J (1995) Concepts of competition. Oxf Econ Pap 47(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbussche J, Aghion P, Meghir C (2006) Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital. J Econ Growth 11:97–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston C (1993) Economic deregulation: days of reckoning for microeconomists. J Econ Lit 31(3):1263–1289

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some of the material included in this paper was developed from the IZA Discussion Paper Series, IZA DP 2016-10448, http://ftp.iza.org/dp10448.pdf and the Global Labor Organization GLO Discussion Paper 2017–8, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/152325. The authors are grateful to an Editor of the journal and three anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoomeh Rashidghalam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heshmati, A., Rashidghalam, M. Estimation of technical change and TFP growth based on observable technology shifters. J Prod Anal 53, 21–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-019-00558-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-019-00558-5

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation