Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 103–121 | Cite as

Assessing the productivity of the Italian hospitality sector: a post-WDEA pooled-truncated and spatial analysis

  • Claudio Detotto
  • Manuela Pulina
  • Juan Gabriel Brida
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses the productivity of the hospitality sector (hotel and restaurants) in Italy at a regional level by using a mix of non-parametric and parametric approaches. A novel pooled-truncated and spatial analysis is employed, based upon a window data envelopment analysis (WDEA), where pure technical efficiency is computed. The WDEA results show that Lombardy is the best relative performer. However, overall Italian regions reveal important sources of inefficiency mostly related to their inputs. As a post-WDEA, the pooled-truncated estimation indicates that the rate of utilisation and regional intrinsic features positively affect hospitality efficiency. Nevertheless, the spatial analysis does not support evidence of spill-over effects amongst Italian regions.

Keywords

Regional hospitality sector Dynamic window data envelopment analysis Double bootstrap Pooled-truncated regression Spatial heterogeneity 

JEL Classification

C14 C24 L83 R11 

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assaf AG, Agbola FW (2011) Modelling the performance of Australian hotels: a DEA double bootstrap approach. Tour Econ 17(1):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assaf AG, Cvelvar LK (2010) The performance of the Slovenian hotel industry: evaluation post-privatisation. Int J Tour Res 12(5):462–471Google Scholar
  4. Assaf A, Barros CP, Josiassen A (2010) Hotel efficiency: a bootstrapped metafrontier approach. Int J Hosp Man 29(3):468–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assaf AG, Deery M, Jago L (2011) Evaluating the performance and scale characteristics of the Australian restaurant industry. J Hosp Tour Res 35(4):419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcombe K, Fraser I, Latruffe L, Rahman M, Smith L (2008) An application of the DEA double bootstrap to examine sources of efficiency in Bangladesh rice farming. App Econ 40(15):1919–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banker PC, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Man Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barros CP (2005) Measuring efficiency in the hotel sector. Ann Our Res 32(2):456–477Google Scholar
  9. Barros CP, Alves FP (2004) Productivity in the tourism industry. IAER, August, 10(3). Technical University of Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  10. Barros CP, Dieke PUC (2008) Technical efficiency of African hotels. Int J Hosp Man 27(3):438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barros CP, Santos CA (2006) The measurement of efficiency in Portuguese hotels using data envelopment analysis. J Hosp Tour Res 30(3):378–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barros CP, Botti L, Peypoch N, Robinot E, Solonandrasana B, Assaf G (2011) Performance of French destinations: tourism attraction perspectives. Tour Man 32(1):141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2007) Firms in international trade. Working Paper 13054, http://www.nber.org/papers/w13054. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
  14. Bernini C, Guizzardi A (2010) Internal and location factors affecting hotel industry efficiency: evidence from Italian business corporations. Tour Econ 16(4):883–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Biagi B, Pulina M (2009) Bivariate VAR models to test granger causality between tourist demand and supply: implications for regional sustainable growth. Pap Reg Sci 88(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bimonte S, Brida JG, Pulina M, Punzo L (2012) Tourism and growth: stories of the two continents, Chapter 16. In: Punzo L, Feijo C, Puchet Anyul M (eds) Beyond the global crisis: structural adjustments and regional integration in Latin America and Europe. Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy, USA, pp 252–268Google Scholar
  17. Brida JG, Deidda M, Pulina M (2012) Investigating economic efficiency in Italy: a regional comparison. Int J Rev Manag 6(3/4):175–198Google Scholar
  18. Brown JR, Dev CS (1999) Looking beyond RevPAR; productivity consequences of hotel strategies. Corn Hot Rest Admin Quart 40(2):23–33Google Scholar
  19. Brown JR, Dev CS (2000) Improving productivity in a service business: evidence from the hotel industry. J Serv Res 2(4):339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruni ME, Guerriero F, Patitucci V (2011) Benchmarking sustainable development via data envelopment analysis: an Italian case study. Int J Environ Res 5(1):47–56Google Scholar
  21. Chang TC (1999) Local uniqueness in the global village: heritage tourism in Singapore. Prof Geogr 51(1):91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Charnes A, Clark CT, Cooper WW, Golany B (1985) A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces. Ann Oper Res 2(1):95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Cortés-Jiménez I, Pulina M (2010) Inbound tourism and long-run economic growth of Spain and Italy. Curr Issue Tour 13(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cracolici MF (2008) Assessment of tourism competitiveness by analysing destination efficiency. Tour Econ 14(2):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cracolici MF, Nijkamp P (2006) Competition among tourist destination. An application of data envelopment analysis to Italian provinces. In: Giaoutzi M, Nijkamp P (eds) Tourism and regional development: new pathways. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, pp 133–152Google Scholar
  28. Cracolici MF, Nijkamp P (2009) The attractiveness and competitiveness of tourist destinations: a study of Southern Italian regions. Tour Man 30(3):336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cullinane K, Song D-W, Wang T-F (2004) An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Rev Net Econ 32:184–206Google Scholar
  30. Diewert WE, Mendoza MNF (1995) Data envelopment analysis: a practical alternative. UBC Departmental Archives 95-30, UBC Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  31. Emrouznejad A, Barnett RP, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Soc-Econ Plan Sci 42(3):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrell J (1957) The Measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120(3):253–290Google Scholar
  33. Federalberghi-Mercury (2005) Rapporto 2005 sul sistema alberghiero in Italia. www.federalberghi.it. Accessed on 31 Jan 2013
  34. Federalberghi-Mercury (2010) Sesto rapporto sul sistema alberghiero in Italia. www.federalberghiit. Accessed on 10 Jan. 2013Google Scholar
  35. Federalberghi-Mercury (2012) DATATUR Trend e statistiche sull’economia del turismo. Federalberghi & Format, RomaGoogle Scholar
  36. Goh HN (2010) Recommending a productivity model for Singapore hotels: A critical review of productivity models adopted by researchers and hotel operators. UNLV Theses/Dissertations/Professional Papers/Capstones. Paper 685Google Scholar
  37. Griffith DA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helfand SM, Levine ES (2004) Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West. Agric Econ 31(2/3):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ISTAT (2011) Sistema di indicatori territoriali. http://sitis.istat.it/sitis/html/index.htm. Accessed 12 Aug 2011
  40. Kilic H, Okumus F (2005) Factors influencing productivity in small island hotels: evidence from Northern Cyprus. Int J Cont Hosp Man 17(4):315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Köksal CD and Aksu AA (2007) Efficiency evaluation of A-group travel agencies with data envelopment analysis (DEA): a case study in the Antalya region, Turkey. Tour Manag 28(3): 830–834Google Scholar
  42. Kravtsova V (2008) Foreign presence and efficiency in transition economies. J Prod Anal 29(2):91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mandl U, Dierx A, Ilzkovitz F (2008) The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending. Eur Comm Econ Pap 301:1–36Google Scholar
  44. Manera Erbina C, Garau Taberner J, Molina de Dios R (2010) The tourism revolution in the Mediterranean, 1950–2005. Documentos de Trabajo, DT-AEHE 1014:1–17Google Scholar
  45. Melão N (2005) Data envelopment analysis revisited: a neophyte’s perspective. Int J Manag Dec Mak 6(2):158–179Google Scholar
  46. Min H, Min H, Joo SJ (2008) A data envelopment analysis-based balanced scorecard for measuring the comparative efficiency of Korean luxury hotels. Int J Qual Rel Man 25(4):349–365Google Scholar
  47. Molina-Azorin JF, Pereira-Moliner J, Claver-Cortés E (2011) The importance of the firm and destination effects to explain firm performance. Tour Man 32(1):22–28Google Scholar
  48. Moriarty JP (2010) Have structural issues placed New Zealand’s hospitality industry beyond price? Tour Econ 16(3):695–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neves JC, Lourenço S (2009) Using data envelopment analysis to select strategies that improve the performance of hotel companies. Inter J Cont Hosp Man 21(6):698–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2002) The use of data envelopment analysis with probabilistic assurance regions for measuring hospital efficiency. J Prod Anal 17(1/2):83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prado Lorenzo JM, Garcìa Sànchez IM (2007) Efficiency evaluation in municipal services: an application to the street lighting service in Spain. J Prod Anal 27(3):149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pulina M, Detotto C, Paba A (2010) An investigation into the relationship between size and efficiency of the Italian hospitality sector: a window DEA approach. Eur J Oper Res 20(4):613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reynolds D (2003) Hospitality-productivity assessment using data-envelopment analysis. Corn Hot Rest Admin Quart 44(2):429–449Google Scholar
  54. Reynolds D, Thompson GM (2007) Multiunit restaurant productivity assessment using three-phase data envelopment analysis. Int J Hosp Man 26(1):20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robert WJA, Haug AA, Jaforullah M (2010) A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. J Prod Anal 34(2):99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salazar NB (2010) The glocalisation of heritage through tourism: Balancing standardisation and differentiation. In: Labadi S, Long C (eds) Heritage and globalisation. Routledge, London, pp 130–147Google Scholar
  57. Sampaio De Souza MC, Cribari-Neto F, Stosic BD (2005) Explaining DEA technical efficiency scores in an outlier corrected environment: the case of public services in Brazilian municipalities. Braz Rev Economet 25(2):287–313Google Scholar
  58. Shuai JJ (2009) Web content and its influence on operational performance-case of the hotel industry. Industrial engineering and engineering management, IEEM, international conference, 8–11 December 2009, pp 885–889. doi:10.1109/IEEM20095372884
  59. Shuai JJ, Wu WW (2011) Evaluating the influence of E-marketing on hotel performance by DEA and grey entropy. Exp Syst Appl 38(7):8763–8769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sigala M (2004) Using data envelopment analysis for measuring and benchmarking productivity in the hotel sector. J Trav Tour Mark 16(2):39–60Google Scholar
  61. Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econom 13(6):31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simar L, Wilson PW (2011) Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor. J Prod Anal 36(2):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sirirak S, Islam N, Khang DB (2011) Does ICT adoption enhance hotel performance? J Hosp Tour Tech 2(1):34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sun DB (1988) Evaluation of managerial performance in large commercial banks by data envelopment analysis. IC2 Institute, AustinGoogle Scholar
  65. Suzuki S, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2011) Regional efficiency improvement by means of data envelopment analysis through Euclidean distance minimization including fixed input factors: an application to tourist regions in Italy. Pap Reg Sci 90(1):67–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. UNWTO (2012) World tourism barometer, vol. 10, February 2012. http://www.unwto.org/. Accessed on 28 May 2012
  67. Wang FC, Hung WT, Shang JK (2006) Measuring the cost efficiency of international tourist hotels in Taiwan. Tour Econ 12(1):65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wanhill S (2011) What do economists do? Their contribution to understanding tourism. Estudios de Economia Aplicada 29(3):679–692Google Scholar
  69. Wilson PW (2008) FEAR: a software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Soc-Econ Plan Sci 42(4):247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. WTTC (2010) Progress and priorities 2009–10 http://www.confederacaoturismoportugues.pt/downloads/get/id/192. Accessed on 14 Oct 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Detotto
    • 1
  • Manuela Pulina
    • 1
  • Juan Gabriel Brida
    • 2
  1. 1.Researcher at Centro Ricerche Economiche Nord e Sud (CRENoS) and Department of Economics (DiSEA)Università di SassariSassariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics at the School of Economics and ManagementFree University of BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations