Skip to main content
Log in

The directional profit efficiency measure: on why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The directional distance function encompasses Shephard’s input and output distance functions and also allows nonradial projections of the assessed firm onto the frontier of the technology in a preassigned direction. However, the criteria underlying the choice of its associated directional vector are numerous. When market prices are observed and firms have a profit maximizing behavior, it seems natural to choose as the directional vector that projecting inefficient firms towards profit maximizing benchmarks. Based on that choice of directional vector, we introduce the directional profit efficiency measure and show that, in this general setting, profit inefficiency can be categorized as either technical, for firms situated within the interior of the technology, or allocative, for firms lying on the frontier. We implement and illustrate the analytical model by way of Data Envelopment Analysis techniques, and introduce the necessary optimization programs for profit inefficiency measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. By Lemma 2.1 in Chambers et al. (1998), D T (x, y; g x , g y ) ≥ 0 if and only if (x, y) ∈ T. In this manner, the constraint β ≥ 0 is implicitly present in Eq. (1) since we consider that the assessed (x, y) belongs to T when measuring its profit efficiency.

  2. Also, the approach could be extended to a free disposal hull setting.

  3. We note that we could render (8) more flexible by letting it solve for the directional vector \( ( {g_{x}^{T} ,g_{y}^{T} } ) \in R_{ + + }^{N} \times R_{ + + }^{M} \), including pg T y  + wg T x  = 1 and g T x , g T y  ≥ 0 as additional constraints, thereby projecting the evaluated firm in the direction leading to the reference benchmark with the highest possible profit compatible with the non-negativity constraint, i.e., the firm is forced to move northwesterly.

  4. Moreover, the case of multiple profit maximizing benchmarks could also arise when input and output prices are not the same across firms (see, for example, Portela and Thanassoulis 2007).

References

  • Aparicio J, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2007) Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. J Prod Anal 28:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Paradi JC, Reese DN, Tam F (2007) Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA. Eur J Oper Res 178:305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball E, Färe R, Grosskopf S, Nehring R (2001) Productivity of the U.S. agricultural sector: the case of undesirable outputs. In: Hulten CR, Dean ER, Harper MJ (eds) New developments in productivity analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 541–586

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1988) Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production. Econometrica 56(6):1315–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Färe R, Obel B (2006) Allocative efficiency of technically inefficient production units. Eur J Oper Res 168:450–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1998) Input and output indicators. In: Färe R, Grosskopf S, Russell RR (eds) Index numbers: essays in honour of Sten Malmquist. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 241–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econom Theory 70:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 95(2):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J Econom 30:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas J-P, Cox TM (1999) A generalized distance function and the analysis of production efficiency. South Econ J 66(2):295–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11:5–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Pastor JT, Aparicio J, Borras F (2011) Decomposing profit inefficiency in DEA through the weighted additive model. Eur J Oper Res 212:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000a) Notes on some inequalities in economics. Econ Theor 15(1):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000b) Theory and applications of directional distance functions. J Prod Anal 13(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G (2007) Network DEA. In: Zhu J, Cook WD (eds) Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis, chapter 12. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency. Am Econ Rev 56:392–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger DG (1992) New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium. J Optim Theory Appl 75:221–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela M, Thanassoulis E (2005) Profitability of a sample of Portuguese bank branches and its decomposition into technical and allocative components. Eur J Oper Res 162(3):850–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela M, Thanassoulis E (2007) Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA. J Oper Res Soc 58:481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portela M, Borges PC, Thanassoulis E (2003) Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: the case of convex and non-convex technologies. J Prod Anal 19:251–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2011) A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency. J Oper Res Soc 62(11):1907–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard R (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the participants and discussants at the International Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity in honor of Prof. Knox Lovell (October 4–5, 2010, Elche, Spain). We acknowledge financial support from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain, and the Conselleria de Educacion, Generalitat Valenciana, for supporting this research with grants MTM2009-10479 and ACOMP/2011/115, respectively. Finally, we are also indebted to two referees for their comments and suggestions that have contributed to improving this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose L. Zofio.

Additional information

A previous version was published in Economics Working Papers Series, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Department of Economics, No. 2010/09.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zofio, J.L., Pastor, J.T. & Aparicio, J. The directional profit efficiency measure: on why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative. J Prod Anal 40, 257–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0292-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0292-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation