Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 85–94 | Cite as

BAM: a bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models

  • William W. Cooper
  • Jesús T. Pastor
  • Fernando Borras
  • Juan Aparicio
  • Diego Pastor
Article

Abstract

A decade ago the Range Adjusted Measure (RAM) was introduced for use with Additive Models. The empirical experience gained since then recommends developing a new measure with similar characteristics but with more discriminatory power. This task is accomplished in this paper by introducing the Bounded Adjusted Measure (BAM) in connection with a new family of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) additive models that incorporate lower bounds for inputs and upper bounds for outputs while accepting any returns to scale imposed on the production technology.

Keywords

DEA Additive models Efficiency measures Returns to scale Bounded additive models 

JEL Classification

C51 C61 

References

  1. Aida K, Cooper WW, Pastor JT, Sueyoshi T (1998) Evaluating water supply services in Japan with Ram: a range-adjusted measure of inefficiency. OMEGA 26(2):207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali AI, Seiford LM (1993) The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. Chapter 3. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Asmild M, Pastor JT (2008) Bounded linear efficiency models, Trabajos I + D, CIO-2008-23, ISSN 1576-7264, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, SpainGoogle Scholar
  4. Asmild M, Pastor JT (2010) Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures. OMEGA 38:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (1999) Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements. J Prod Anal 12:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briec W (1999) Hölder distance function and measurement of technical efficiency. J Prod Anal 11(2):111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98(2):351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis and Pareto-Koopmans empirical production functions. J Econom 30:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11(1):5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovell CAK, Pastor JT (1995) Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Oper Res Lett 18:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pastor JT (1994) “New Additive Models for handling Zero and Negative Data”, Working Paper, Depto. Estad. e Inv. Oper., Universidad de Alicante, SpainGoogle Scholar
  14. Pastor JT, Ruiz JL (2007) Variables with Negative Values in Dea, Chapter 4. In: Cook WD, Zhu J (eds) Modelling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115(3):596–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pastor JT, Lovell CAK, Aparicio J (2008) Families of linear efficiency models based on Debreu’s loss function, Trabajos I + D, CIO I-2008-12, ISSN 1576-7264, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, SpainGoogle Scholar
  17. Ray SC (2004) Data envelopment analysis. Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sharp JA, Meng W, Liu W (2007) A modified slack-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. J Oper Res Soc 58:1672–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Silva-Portela MC, Thanassoulis E (2006) Malmquist indexes using a geometric distance function (GDF). Application to a sample of Portuguese bank branches. J Prod Anal 25:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silva-Portela MCA, Thanassoulis E, Simpson G (2004) Negative data in DEA: a directional distance function approach applied to bank branches. J Oper Res Soc 55:1111–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William W. Cooper
    • 1
  • Jesús T. Pastor
    • 2
  • Fernando Borras
    • 2
  • Juan Aparicio
    • 2
  • Diego Pastor
    • 3
  1. 1.Red McCombs School of BusinessThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Center of Operations Research (CIO)Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheElcheSpain
  3. 3.División de Educación Física y DeportivaUniversidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheElcheSpain

Personalised recommendations