Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alston J, Pardey P (1996) Making science pay. AEI Press

  • Atkinson S, Dorfman J (2005) Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution. J Econometr 126:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chib S, Greenberg E (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods in econometrics. Econometr Theor 12:409–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths W, O’Donnell C, Tan Cruz A (1999) Imposing regularity conditions on a system of cost and factor share equations. Working Paper Series in Agricultural Economics, University of New England

  • Huffman W, Evenson R (1989) Supply and demand functions for multiproduct US cash grain farms: biases caused by research and other policies. Am J Agri Econ 71:761–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh Y, Stefanou S (1993) Learning-by-doing and the sources of productivity growth: a dynamic model with applications to US Agriculture. J Prod Anal 4:353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh Y, Stefanou S (1991) Productivity growth in US agriculture under dynamic adjustment. Am J Agri Econ 73:1116–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell C, Shumway R, Ball E (1999) Input demands and inefficiency in US agriculture. Am J Agri Econ 81:865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell CJ (2002) Parametric estimation of technical and allocative efficiency in US agriculture, chapt 6. In: Ball VE, Norton GW (eds) Agricultural productivity: measurement and sources of growth, KAP

  • Onofri A, Fulginiti LE (2006) Dynamic TFP index with endogenous growth in US agriculture. Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

  • Terrel D (1996) Incorporating monotonicity and concavity conditions in flexible functional forms. J Appl Econometr 11:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirtle C, Schimmelpfenning D, Townsend R (2002) Induced innovation in United States agriculture, 1880–1990: time series tests and an error correction model. Am J Agri Econ 84:598–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. E. Fulginiti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onofri, A., Fulginiti, L.E. Rejoinder. J Prod Anal 30, 81–85 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0094-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0094-6

Keywords

Navigation