Skip to main content
Log in

Information value and efficiency measurement for risk-averse firms

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper has three goals. First, we demonstrate that standard arguments and methods from production and duality analysis can be used to provide a comprehensive and general treatment of the value of information for a risk-averse firm with expected-utility (linear-in-probabilities) preferences and a general stochastic technology. Second, we place bounds on the value of information for a risk-averse firm and relate these bounds to characteristics of the technology and the producer’s preferences. The third and final goal is to derive the implications that information differences can have for measured efficiency differences and to relate the bounds on the value of information to those measured differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidtp (1997) Formualtion and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J␣Econometrics 6:21–37

  • Athey S (2000) Investment and information value for a risk-averse firm. Working Paper, MIT

  • Athey S (2002) Monotone comparative statics under uncertainty. Quart J Econ 117:187–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Athey S, Levin J (2000) The value of information in monotone decision problems. Working Paper, MIT

  • Blackwell D (1951) Comparison of experiments. In: Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics, pp 93–102

  • Chambers RG, Quiggin J (2000) Uncertainty, production, choice, and agency: the state-contingent approach. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C (1995) Demand for risky assets and the monotone probability ratio order. J Risk Uncertainty 11:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R (1988) Fundamentals of production theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (1995) The comparative statics of risk revisited. J Econ Theory 66:522–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J, Riley J (1992) The analytics of uncertanity and information. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Lehmann EL (1988) Comparing location experiments. Ann Stat 16:521–533

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Cost, revenue, and profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell C, Griffiths WF (2006) Estimating state-contingent production frontiers. Am J Agric Econ 88:289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell C, Chambers RG, Quiggin J (2006) The role of information in explaining empirical efficiency differences in a stochastic world. University of Queensland, February 2006

  • Ormiston M, Schlee E (1992) Necessary conditions for comparative statics under uncertainty. Econ Lett 40:429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston M, Schlee E (1993) Comparative statics under uncertainty for a class of economic agents. J Econ Theory 61:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Chambers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chambers, R.G., Quiggin, J. Information value and efficiency measurement for risk-averse firms. J Prod Anal 27, 197–208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0038-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0038-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation