Abstract
Alternative high school (AHS) students typically report higher levels of alcohol and other drug use compared to students attending traditional high schools. Greater use of such drugs as heroin, methamphetamines, and cocaine in this at-risk population may be driven, in part, by a greater latitude of acceptance toward substance use in general, which may accelerate the transition from gateway drugs to hard drugs. Seven hundred seventy-seven adolescents (mean age 16.6; 56% female) were recruited from alternative high schools throughout Southern California. To understand the factors that may lead AHS students to use hard drugs, a model was tested in order to determine if AHS students’ latitude of acceptance toward substance use was a mediator between the relationship of past use of gateway drugs and future use of hard drugs. Latitude of acceptance was found to be a statistically significant mediator of future hard drug use (b = 0.03, 95% confidence intervals = 0.01 to 0.05) among gateway drug users. An individual’s latitude of acceptance to various drug use behaviors may be consistent with societal norms. However, after exposure to, or use of, gateway drugs, attitudes that are more permissive toward hard drug use may be encountered, the acceptance of hard drugs may expand, and the use of hard drugs may escalate. Interventions designed to reduce the use of hard drugs among at-risk youth may be more persuasive by crafting messages that are within the latitude of acceptance of the target population and prevent the acceptance of hard drug use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Four hundred forty-seven participants completed the Time 2 assessment and 449 participants completed the Time 3 assessment.
Results are substantively similar when analysis with imputed dataset excludes students who reported hard drug use at baseline (BootCI, 0.009–0.015).
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116.
Allen, J. P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., & Marston, E. (2012). Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Development, 83, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01682.x.
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage University.
Ames, S. L., Franken, I. H., & Coronges, K. (2006). Implicit cognition and drugs of abuse. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 363–378). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Thush, C., Sussman, S., Wiers, R. W., & Stacy, A. W. (2007). Comparison of indirect assessments of association as predictors of marijuana use among at-risk adolescents. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.218.
Ames, S.L., Grenard, J.L., Stacy, A.W., Xiao, L., He, Q., Wong, S.W., … Bechara, A. (2013). Functional imaging of implicit marijuana associations during performance on an implicit association test (IAT). Behavioural Brain Research, 256, 494–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.013.
Ames, S. L., Xie, B., Shono, Y., & Stacy, A. W. (2017). Adolescents at risk for drug abuse: A 3-year dual-process analysis. Addiction, 112, 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13742.
Atkins, A. L., Deaux, K. K., & Bieri, J. (1967). Latitude of acceptance and attitude change: Empirical evidence for a reformulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024527.
Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553.
Barry, A. E., King, J., Sears, C., Harville, C., Bondoc, I., & Joseph, K. (2016). Prioritizing alcohol prevention: Establishing alcohol as the gateway drug and linking age of first drink with illicit drug use. The Journal of School Health, 86, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12351.
Bava, S., & Tapert, S. F. (2010). Adolescent brain development and the risk for alcohol and other drug problems. Neuropsychology Review, 20, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-010-9146-6.
Beleva, Y., Pike, J. R., Miller, S., Xie, B., Ames, S. L., & Stacy, A. W. (2019). Share of advertising voice at the point-of-sale and its influence on at-risk students’ use of alternative tobacco products. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 21, 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty152.
California Department of Education (2020). Alternative Schools & Programs of Choice. Sacramento, CA. Retrieved from: www.cde.ca.gov.
Chen, C. Y., Storr, C. L., & Anthony, J. C. (2009). Early-onset drug use and risk for drug dependence problems. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.10.021.
de Velasco, J.R., & Gonzales, D. (2017). Accountability for alternative schools in California. Retrieved from Sacramento, CA:
de Velasco, J. R., Austin, G., Dixon, D., Johnson, J., McLaughlin, M., & Perez, L. (2008). Alternative education options: A descriptive study of California continuation high schools. San Diego: California Alternative Education Research Project, San Diego University.
Deas, D., Riggs, P., Langenbucher, J., Goldman, M., & Brown, S. (2000). Adolescents are not adults: Developmental considerations in alcohol users. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb04596.x.
Deaux, K. K., & Bieri, J. (1967). Latitude of acceptance in judgments of masculinity-femininity1. Journal of Personality, 35, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01418.x.
Degenhardt, L., Dierker, L., Chiu, W.T., Medina-Mora, M.E., Neumark, Y., Sampson, N., … Kessler, R.C. (2010). Evaluating the drug use “gateway” theory using cross-national data: Consistency and associations of the order of initiation of drug use among participants in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 108(1–2), 84–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.001.
Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x.
Eisenberg, M. E., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hemphill, S. A. (2014). Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the International Youth Development Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1486–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0111-1.
Ennett, S. T., Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Hipp, J. R., & Cai, L. (2010). A social contextual analysis of youth cigarette smoking development. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12, 950–962. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq122.
Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2006). Cannabis use and other illicit drug use: Testing the cannabis gateway hypothesis. Addiction, 101, 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01322.x.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872.
Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.
Garnier, H. E., & Stein, J. A. (2002). An 18-year model of family and peer effects on adolescent drug use and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014085016511.
Gilreath, T. D., Chaix, B., King, G., Matthews, S., & Flisher, A. J. (2012). Multi-level influence of school norms on tobacco use in South Africa: An ecometric consideration of group differences. Cancer Causes & Control, 23, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9908-y.
Graham, J. W., Flay, B. R., Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Grossman, L., & Sobel, J. L. (1984). Reliability of self-report measures of drug use in prevention research: Evaluation of the Project SMART questionnaire via the test-retest reliability matrix. Journal of Drug Education, 14, 175–193.
Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9.
Grant, B. F., & Dawson, D. A. (1997). Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: Results from the national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-3289(97)90009-2.
Grenard, J. L., Ames, S. L., Wiers, R. W., Thush, C., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. (2008). Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.426.
Grunbaum, J. A., Lowry, R., & Kann, L. (2001). Prevalence of health-related behaviors among alternative high school students as compared with students attending regular high schools. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00304-4.
Hanson, K. L., Thayer, R. E., & Tapert, S. F. (2014). Adolescent marijuana users have elevated risk-taking on the balloon analog risk task. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 28, 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114550352.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (second ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.
Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24, 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187.
Hoffman, B. R., Sussman, S., Unger, J. B., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: A theoretical review of the literature. Substance Use & Misuse, 41, 103–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080500368892.
Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048480.
Janik, P., Kosticova, M., Pecenak, J. P., & Turcek, M. (2017). Categorization of psychoactive substances into “hard drugs” and “soft drugs”: A critical review of terminology used in current scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43, 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2017.1335736.
Johnson, K., & Taliaferro, L. (2012a). Health behaviors and mental health of students attending alternative high schools: A review of the research literature. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 17, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00311.x.
Johnson, K. E., & Taliaferro, L. A. (2012b). Health behaviors and mental health of students attending alternative high schools: A review of the research literature. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 17, 79–97.
Johnson, K. E., McMorris, B. J., & Kubik, M. Y. (2013). Comparison of health-risk behaviors among students attending alternative and traditional high schools in Minnesota. The Journal of School Nursing, 29, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840512469409.
Johnston, L.D., O’Malley, P. M., Miech, R. A., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2016). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2015: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Johnston, L.D., Miech, R.A., O’Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Schulenberg, J.E., & Patrick, M.E. (2019). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use 1975–2018: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Retrieved from Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kandel, D. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190, 912–914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188374.
Kandel, E. R., & Kandel, D. B. (2014). Shattuck lecture. A molecular basis for nicotine as a gateway drug. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1405092.
Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance — United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016;65(No. SS-6):1–174. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6506a1.
King, K. M., & Chassin, L. (2007). A prospective study of the effects of age of initiation of alcohol and drug use on young adult substance dependence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2007.68.256.
Kirby, T., & Barry, A. E. (2012). Alcohol as a gateway drug: A study of US 12th graders. The Journal of School Health, 82, 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00712.x.
LAO. (2015). Next steps for improving state accountability for alternative schools. Retrieved from Sacramento, CA:
Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
McCuller, W. J., Sussman, S., Holiday, K., Craig, S., & Dent, C. W. (2002). Tracking procedures for locating high-risk youth. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25, 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278702025003006.
McCusker, C. G. (2001). Cognitive biases and addiction: An evolution in theory and method. Addiction, 96, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652140020016950.
Miller, J. W., Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., & Jones, S. E. (2007). Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics, 119, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1517.
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: A review of recent methodological developments. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.423.
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). The impact of family context, deviant attitudes, and emotional distress on adolescent drug use: Longitudinal latent-variable analyses of mothers and their children. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90012-8.
Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., Kingsley Westerman, C. Y., Orfgen, T., & Foregger, S. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x.
Pike, J. R., Shono, Y., Tan, N., Xie, B., & Stacy, A. W. (2019). Retail outlets prompt associative memories linked to the repeated use of nicotine and tobacco products among alternative high school students in California. Addictive Behaviors, 99, 106067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106067.
Reid, L. W., Elifson, K. W., & Sterk, C. E. (2007). Ecstasy and gateway drugs: Initiating the use of ecstasy and other drugs. Annals of Epidemiology, 17, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.07.013.
Rohrbach, L. A., Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Sun, P. (2005). Tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use among high-risk young people: A five-year longitudinal study from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260503500206.
Rooke, S. E., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2008). Implicit cognition and substance use: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009.
Saunders, J., & Saunders, E. (2001). Alternative school students’ perceptions of past [traditional] and current [alternative] school environments. The High School Journal, 85, 12–23.
Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT.
Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R.E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgement-involvement process. Saunders Co.: Philadelphia & London.
Smith, S. W., Atkin, C. K., Martell, D., Allen, R., & Hembroff, L. (2006). A social judgment theory approach to conducting formative research in a social norms campaign. Communication Theory, 16, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00009.x.
Spijkerman, R., van den Eijnden, R. J., Vitale, S., & Engels, R. C. (2004). Explaining adolescents’ smoking and drinking behavior: The concept of smoker and drinker prototypes in relation to variables of the theory of planned behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1615–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.030.
Squeglia, L. M., Jacobus, J., & Tapert, S. F. (2009). The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940904000110.
Stacy, A. W. (1997). Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 61–73.
Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444.
Stacy, A. W., Flay, B. R., Sussman, S., Brown, S. K., Santi, S., & Best, J. A. (1990). Validity of alternative self-report indices of smoking among adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 2, 442–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.442.
Sussman, S., & Ames, S. L. (2001). The social psychology of drug abuse. Buckingham, GB: Open University Press.
Sussman, S., Stacy, A.W., Dent, C.W., Simon, T.R., Galaif, E.R., Moss, M.A., … Johnson, C.A. (1995). Continuation high schools: Youth at risk for drug abuse. Journal of Drug Education, 25, 191–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/HDQH-XD21-GJT0-9G8V.
Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Galaif, E. R. (1997). The correlates of substance abuse and dependence among adolescents at high risk for drug abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-3289(97)90019-5.
Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Stacy, A. W. (2002). Project towards no drug abuse: A review of the findings and future directions. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 354–365. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.26.5.4.
Sussman, S., Skara, S., & Ames, S. L. (2008). Substance abuse among adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1802–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080802297302.
Sussman, S., Arpawong, T. E., Sun, P., Tsai, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2014). Prevalence and co-occurrence of addictive behaviors among former alternative high school youth. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.3.2014.005.
Volkow, N. D., Baler, R. D., Compton, W. M., & Weiss, S. R. (2014). Adverse health effects of marijuana use. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370, 2219–2227. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1402309.
Wiers, R. W., & Stacy, A. W. (2006). Implicit Cognition and Addiction: An Introduction. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (p. 1–8). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976237.n1.
Zweig, J.M. (2003). Vulnerable youth: Identifying their need for alternative educational settings. The Urban Institute. Washington, D.C.
Funding
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA023368, DA024659, DA024772) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA017996). NIDA and NIAAA had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in the writing of the report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Claremont Graduate University Institutional Review Board (IRB00001114) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cappelli, C., Ames, S.L., Xie, B. et al. Acceptance of Drug Use Mediates Future Hard Drug Use Among At-Risk Adolescent Marijuana, Tobacco, and Alcohol Users. Prev Sci 22, 545–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01165-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01165-9