Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Economic Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of Providing Comprehensive Supports to Students in Elementary School

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing evidence that out-of-school factors, such as physical and mental health, family support, and social and emotional development, significantly affect student learning (Berliner 2009). To address challenges related to poverty, schools are being charged with serving as a focal point in providing and coordinating support services for students and their families (Adelman and Taylor 2002; Dryfoos 2002). In many schools these support services are provided in fragmented ways that do not address the needs of all students or engage teachers in connecting these services to the academic mission of the school (Walsh and DePaul 2008). An emerging school-based model, broadly termed “comprehensive student support” (Walsh et al. 2016), is designed to overcome such fragmentation. In this paper, we build upon previous effectiveness work with an economic evaluation of a successful support model, City Connects. We find that the benefits of the program exceed the costs, indicating that the program is a sound investment and should be considered an option to address the needs of students and to prevent future crises from disrupting their learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2002). Building comprehensive, multifaceted, and integrated approaches to address barriers to student learning. Childhood Education, 78, 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, K., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A. (2001). Food insufficiency and American school-aged children's cognitive, academic, and psychosocial development. Pediatrics, 108, 44–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science, 344, 843–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basch, C. E. (2011). Healthier students are better learners: A missing link in school reforms to close the achievement gap. Journal of School Health, 81, 593–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2007a). The Price we pay: The economic and social costs of inadequate education. Brookings Institution.

  • Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2007b). The economic losses from high school dropouts in California. In Monograph www.cdrp.ucsb.edu/pubs_reports.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2009). Some economic consequences of improving math performance. In Technical report 1, Center for Technology in learning. SRI: International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit http://epicpolicy.org/publication/poverty-and-potential.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Boston College Center for Optimized Student Support. (2014). The impact of City Connects: progress report 2014. http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/lsoe/cityconnects/pdf/CityConnects_ProgressReport_2014.pdf.

  • Bowden, A. B., Belfield, C. R., Levin, H. M., Shand, R., Wang, A., & Morales, M. (2015). A Benefit-Cost Analysis of City Connects. Center for Benefit Cost Studies of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, A. B., Muroga, A., Wang, A., Shand, R., Levin, H. M. (2018). Examining Systems of Student Support. Center for Benefit Cost Studies of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, A. B., Shand, R., Belfield, C. R., Wang, A., & Levin, H. M. (2017). Evaluating educational interventions that induce service receipt: A case study application of City Connects. American Journal of Evaluation, 38, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, P., Caffray, C. M., Jones, A. S., Lillie-Blanton, M., & Werthamer, L. (2001). Applying cost analysis methods to school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science, 2, 45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2008). Understanding the processes through which economic hardship influences families and children. In D. R. Crane & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Handbook of families and poverty (pp. 64–81). Sage Publications.

  • Creswell, R. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

  • Crowley, D. M., Hill, L. G., Kuklinski, M. R., & Jones, D. E. (2014). Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: Current issues and future directions. Prevention Science, 15, 789–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, E. (2008). The psychological costs of growing up poor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Special Issue: scientific Approaches to Understanding and Reducing Poverty, S. G. Kaler & O. M. Rennert, Eds.) 1136, 324-332.

  • Dearing, E., Walsh, M. E., Sibley, E., Lee-St. John, T., Foley, C., & Raczek, A. E. (2016). Can community and school-based supports improve the achievement of first-generation immigrant children attending high-poverty schools? Child Development, 87, 883–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, E., & Taylor, B. A. (2007). Home improvements: Within-family associations between income and the quality of children's home environments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Dryfoos, J. (2002). Partnering full-service community schools: Creating new institutions. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eha, B. P. (2013). The best and worst U.S. cities for renting office space. Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/227319

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., LeBoeuf, W. A., Chen, C. C., Rouse, H. L., & Culhane, D. P. (2012). The unique and combined effects of homelessness and school mobility on the educational outcomes of young children. Educational Researcher, 41, 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heers, M., Van Klaveren, C., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2016). Community schools: What we know and what we need to know. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1016–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J. R., Riehl, C. J., Rebell, M. A., & Wolff, J. R. (2015). Putting collective impact in context: A review of the literature on local cross-sector collaboration to improve education. New York: Teachers College, Department of Education Policy & Social Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. R., Gomez, C. J., Sontag-Padilla, L., Xenakis, L., & Anderson, B. (2017). Developing community schools at scale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, L. (2012). Toward standardization of benefit-cost analysis of early childhood interventions. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 3, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-St. John, T. J., Walsh, M. E., Raczek, A. E., Vuilleumier, C. E., Foley, C., Heberle, A., Sibley, S., & Dearing, E. (2018). The long-term impact of systemic student support in elementary school: Reducing high school dropout. AERA Open, 4https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418799085.

  • Levin, H. M. (1975). Cost-effectiveness analysis in evaluation research. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2). Sage.

  • Levin, H. M., McEwan, P. J., Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., & Shand, R. (2018). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. Sage.

  • Lochner, L., & Moretti, E. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. American Economic Review, 94, 155–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2012). 2012 graduation rate report (district) for all students 5-year graduation rate. http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/gradrates.aspx

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and interpretation. Jossey-Bass.

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Sage Publications.

  • Moore K. A., Terzian M., Caal S., Princiotta D., Carney R., Ryberg R. (2014). Making the grade: Assessing the evidence for an integrated student supports. Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J., Maier, A., & Daniel, J. (2017). Community schools: An evidence-based strategy for equitable school improvement. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/equitable-community-schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities (Vol. 7). National Academies Press.

  • Porche, M. V., Fortuna, L. R., Lin, J., & Alegria, M. (2011). Childhood trauma and psychiatric disorders as correlates of school dropout in a national sample of young adults. Child Development, 82, 982–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. K. (2001). The cost of working together: A framework for estimating the costs of comprehensive support systems for children. Administration & Society, 33, 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R. (2010). How to fix our schools. (issue brief #286). Economic policy institute. www.epi.org.

  • Schoeni, R. F., Dow, W. H., Miller, W. D., & Pamuk, E. R. (2011). The economic value of improving the health of disadvantaged Americans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, S67–S72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 274–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, E., Theodorakakis, M., Walsh, M. E., Foley, C., Petrie, J., & Raczek, A. (2017). The impact of comprehensive student support on teachers: Knowledge of the whole child, classroom practice, and teacher support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaces4Learning. (2012). School Planning and Management. Peter Li Education Group.

  • Trostel, P. (2010). The fiscal impacts of college attainment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). National compensation survey. http://www.bls.gov/ncs/

  • Waldfogel, J., Garfinkel, I., & Kelly, B. (2007). Public assistance programs: How much could be saved with improved education? In C. R. Belfield & H. M. Levin (Eds.), The Price we pay: The social and economic costs to the nation of inadequate education. Brookings Institution Press.

  • Walsh, M. E., & DePaul, G. (2008). The essential role of school-community partnerships in school counseling. In H. L. K. Coleman & C. Yeh (Eds.), Handbook of school counseling (pp. 765–783). MidAtlantic Books & Journals.

  • Walsh, M. E., Gish, J. W., Foley, C., Theodorakakis, M., & Rene, K. (2016). Principles of effective practice for integrated student support. Center for Optimized Student Support.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. E., Madaus, G. F., Raczek, A. E., Dearing, E., Foley, C., An, C., Lee-St. John, T., & Beaton, A. (2014). A new model for student support in high-poverty urban elementary schools: Effects on elementary and middle school academic outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 704–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the GHR foundation and the Center for Optimized Student Support at Boston College. The authors of this study were not affiliated with the City Connects program, Boston College, or the GHR foundation and hold no financial interests in these entities or otherwise conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL, BB, and RS conceived the study. BB lead the design, coordinated the conduct of the study, collected data, performed analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. RS supported design, developed and piloted instruments, collected data, performed analyses, supported interpretation of the data, and helped draft the manuscript. HL provided expert guidance and supported interpretation and drafting the manuscript. AM and AW collected data, performed analyses, supported interpretation of the data, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Brooks Bowden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This work was conducted under Teachers College, Columbia University IRB Protocol Number 14–312, in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The data collected here focused on processes, administration, and records, and was considered exempt. Boston Public Schools also approved this work.

Informed Consent

All participants freely agreed to participate in this study and IRB rules were followed to obtain informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowden, A.B., Shand, R., Levin, H.M. et al. An Economic Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of Providing Comprehensive Supports to Students in Elementary School. Prev Sci 21, 1126–1135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01164-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01164-w

Keywords

Navigation