Abstract
There is growing evidence that out-of-school factors, such as physical and mental health, family support, and social and emotional development, significantly affect student learning (Berliner 2009). To address challenges related to poverty, schools are being charged with serving as a focal point in providing and coordinating support services for students and their families (Adelman and Taylor 2002; Dryfoos 2002). In many schools these support services are provided in fragmented ways that do not address the needs of all students or engage teachers in connecting these services to the academic mission of the school (Walsh and DePaul 2008). An emerging school-based model, broadly termed “comprehensive student support” (Walsh et al. 2016), is designed to overcome such fragmentation. In this paper, we build upon previous effectiveness work with an economic evaluation of a successful support model, City Connects. We find that the benefits of the program exceed the costs, indicating that the program is a sound investment and should be considered an option to address the needs of students and to prevent future crises from disrupting their learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2002). Building comprehensive, multifaceted, and integrated approaches to address barriers to student learning. Childhood Education, 78, 261–268.
Alaimo, K., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A. (2001). Food insufficiency and American school-aged children's cognitive, academic, and psychosocial development. Pediatrics, 108, 44–53.
Autor, D. H. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science, 344, 843–851.
Basch, C. E. (2011). Healthier students are better learners: A missing link in school reforms to close the achievement gap. Journal of School Health, 81, 593–598.
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2007a). The Price we pay: The economic and social costs of inadequate education. Brookings Institution.
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2007b). The economic losses from high school dropouts in California. In Monograph www.cdrp.ucsb.edu/pubs_reports.htm.
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2009). Some economic consequences of improving math performance. In Technical report 1, Center for Technology in learning. SRI: International.
Berliner, D. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit http://epicpolicy.org/publication/poverty-and-potential.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Boston College Center for Optimized Student Support. (2014). The impact of City Connects: progress report 2014. http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/lsoe/cityconnects/pdf/CityConnects_ProgressReport_2014.pdf.
Bowden, A. B., Belfield, C. R., Levin, H. M., Shand, R., Wang, A., & Morales, M. (2015). A Benefit-Cost Analysis of City Connects. Center for Benefit Cost Studies of Education.
Bowden, A. B., Muroga, A., Wang, A., Shand, R., Levin, H. M. (2018). Examining Systems of Student Support. Center for Benefit Cost Studies of Education.
Bowden, A. B., Shand, R., Belfield, C. R., Wang, A., & Levin, H. M. (2017). Evaluating educational interventions that induce service receipt: A case study application of City Connects. American Journal of Evaluation, 38, 405–419.
Chatterji, P., Caffray, C. M., Jones, A. S., Lillie-Blanton, M., & Werthamer, L. (2001). Applying cost analysis methods to school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science, 2, 45–55.
Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2008). Understanding the processes through which economic hardship influences families and children. In D. R. Crane & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Handbook of families and poverty (pp. 64–81). Sage Publications.
Creswell, R. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Crowley, D. M., Hill, L. G., Kuklinski, M. R., & Jones, D. E. (2014). Research priorities for economic analyses of prevention: Current issues and future directions. Prevention Science, 15, 789–798.
Dearing, E. (2008). The psychological costs of growing up poor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Special Issue: scientific Approaches to Understanding and Reducing Poverty, S. G. Kaler & O. M. Rennert, Eds.) 1136, 324-332.
Dearing, E., Walsh, M. E., Sibley, E., Lee-St. John, T., Foley, C., & Raczek, A. E. (2016). Can community and school-based supports improve the achievement of first-generation immigrant children attending high-poverty schools? Child Development, 87, 883–897.
Dearing, E., & Taylor, B. A. (2007). Home improvements: Within-family associations between income and the quality of children's home environments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 427–444.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Dryfoos, J. (2002). Partnering full-service community schools: Creating new institutions. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 393–399.
Eha, B. P. (2013). The best and worst U.S. cities for renting office space. Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/227319
Fantuzzo, J. W., LeBoeuf, W. A., Chen, C. C., Rouse, H. L., & Culhane, D. P. (2012). The unique and combined effects of homelessness and school mobility on the educational outcomes of young children. Educational Researcher, 41, 393–402.
Heers, M., Van Klaveren, C., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2016). Community schools: What we know and what we need to know. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1016–1051.
Henig, J. R., Riehl, C. J., Rebell, M. A., & Wolff, J. R. (2015). Putting collective impact in context: A review of the literature on local cross-sector collaboration to improve education. New York: Teachers College, Department of Education Policy & Social Analysis.
Johnston, W. R., Gomez, C. J., Sontag-Padilla, L., Xenakis, L., & Anderson, B. (2017). Developing community schools at scale.
Karoly, L. (2012). Toward standardization of benefit-cost analysis of early childhood interventions. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 3, 1–45.
Lee-St. John, T. J., Walsh, M. E., Raczek, A. E., Vuilleumier, C. E., Foley, C., Heberle, A., Sibley, S., & Dearing, E. (2018). The long-term impact of systemic student support in elementary school: Reducing high school dropout. AERA Open, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418799085.
Levin, H. M. (1975). Cost-effectiveness analysis in evaluation research. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2). Sage.
Levin, H. M., McEwan, P. J., Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., & Shand, R. (2018). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. Sage.
Lochner, L., & Moretti, E. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. American Economic Review, 94, 155–189.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2012). 2012 graduation rate report (district) for all students 5-year graduation rate. http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/gradrates.aspx
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and interpretation. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Moore K. A., Terzian M., Caal S., Princiotta D., Carney R., Ryberg R. (2014). Making the grade: Assessing the evidence for an integrated student supports. Child Trends.
Oakes, J., Maier, A., & Daniel, J. (2017). Community schools: An evidence-based strategy for equitable school improvement. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/equitable-community-schools.
O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities (Vol. 7). National Academies Press.
Porche, M. V., Fortuna, L. R., Lin, J., & Alegria, M. (2011). Childhood trauma and psychiatric disorders as correlates of school dropout in a national sample of young adults. Child Development, 82, 982–998.
Rice, J. K. (2001). The cost of working together: A framework for estimating the costs of comprehensive support systems for children. Administration & Society, 33, 455–479.
Rothstein, R. (2010). How to fix our schools. (issue brief #286). Economic policy institute. www.epi.org.
Schoeni, R. F., Dow, W. H., Miller, W. D., & Pamuk, E. R. (2011). The economic value of improving the health of disadvantaged Americans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, S67–S72.
Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 274–286.
Sibley, E., Theodorakakis, M., Walsh, M. E., Foley, C., Petrie, J., & Raczek, A. (2017). The impact of comprehensive student support on teachers: Knowledge of the whole child, classroom practice, and teacher support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 145–156.
Spaces4Learning. (2012). School Planning and Management. Peter Li Education Group.
Trostel, P. (2010). The fiscal impacts of college attainment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 220–247.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). National compensation survey. http://www.bls.gov/ncs/
Waldfogel, J., Garfinkel, I., & Kelly, B. (2007). Public assistance programs: How much could be saved with improved education? In C. R. Belfield & H. M. Levin (Eds.), The Price we pay: The social and economic costs to the nation of inadequate education. Brookings Institution Press.
Walsh, M. E., & DePaul, G. (2008). The essential role of school-community partnerships in school counseling. In H. L. K. Coleman & C. Yeh (Eds.), Handbook of school counseling (pp. 765–783). MidAtlantic Books & Journals.
Walsh, M. E., Gish, J. W., Foley, C., Theodorakakis, M., & Rene, K. (2016). Principles of effective practice for integrated student support. Center for Optimized Student Support.
Walsh, M. E., Madaus, G. F., Raczek, A. E., Dearing, E., Foley, C., An, C., Lee-St. John, T., & Beaton, A. (2014). A new model for student support in high-poverty urban elementary schools: Effects on elementary and middle school academic outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 704–737.
Funding
This work was funded by the GHR foundation and the Center for Optimized Student Support at Boston College. The authors of this study were not affiliated with the City Connects program, Boston College, or the GHR foundation and hold no financial interests in these entities or otherwise conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HL, BB, and RS conceived the study. BB lead the design, coordinated the conduct of the study, collected data, performed analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. RS supported design, developed and piloted instruments, collected data, performed analyses, supported interpretation of the data, and helped draft the manuscript. HL provided expert guidance and supported interpretation and drafting the manuscript. AM and AW collected data, performed analyses, supported interpretation of the data, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This work was conducted under Teachers College, Columbia University IRB Protocol Number 14–312, in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The data collected here focused on processes, administration, and records, and was considered exempt. Boston Public Schools also approved this work.
Informed Consent
All participants freely agreed to participate in this study and IRB rules were followed to obtain informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 27 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowden, A.B., Shand, R., Levin, H.M. et al. An Economic Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of Providing Comprehensive Supports to Students in Elementary School. Prev Sci 21, 1126–1135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01164-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-020-01164-w