Skip to main content

Those Who Disappear and Those Who Say Goodbye: Patterns of Attrition in Long-Term Home Visiting

Abstract

Most evidence-based home visiting models are designed to support families from pregnancy through a child’s second birthday, though programs often struggle to retain families for this long. Previous research on client and program factors that predict attrition has produced mixed results, which may be partly because attrition is typically conceptualized as a homogeneous phenomenon. The current study sampled 991 women who received home visiting services from one of 26 agencies in a statewide network of evidence-based programs. Participants who remained in services were compared to three types of early leavers: those who communicated their intent to leave (active attrition), those whose cases closed due to non-participation (passive attrition), and those who moved from the service area. Within a year of enrollment, 42% of women exited services. Cox regression results suggested no differences in the timing of service exit among the three attrition types. Multinomial analyses revealed that, when compared to participants who remained in services, active leavers were more likely to be married or cohabitating, while passive leavers were more likely to be younger, African American, unemployed, and to have a home visitor with low job satisfaction. Participants who moved were less likely to be Latina and employed. An early pattern of inconsistent attendance was the strongest predictor of active and passive withdrawal. Rates of attrition varied by home visiting model, though inconsistent attendance was a robust predictor of passive attrition across models. This study underscores the need to scrutinize service duration as a metric of success in home visiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Brand, T., & Jungmann, T. (2014). Participant characteristics and process variables predict attrition from a home-based early intervention program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damashek, A., Doughty, D., Ware, L., & Silovsky, J. (2011). Predictors of client engagement and attrition in home-based child maltreatment prevention services. Child Maltreatment, 16(1), 9–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daro, D., McCurdy, K., Falconnier, L., & Stojanovic, D. (2003). Sustaining new parents in home visitation services: Key participant and program factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(10), 1101–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., Sato, J., & Guptill, S. (2014). Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S136–S143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, A., Windham, A., McFarlane, E., Fuddy, L., Rohde, C., Buchbinder, S., & Sia, C. (2000). Hawaii’s healthy start program of home visiting for at-risk families: Evaluation of family identification, family engagement, and service delivery. Pediatrics, 105, 250–259.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350.

  • Fernandes-Alcantara, A. L. (2016). Maternal and Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program: Background and funding (report R43930). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, A. T., Brentley, A. L., Goyal, N. K., Hall, E. S., Sa, T., Peugh, J. L., et al. (2016). Evaluation of a community-based approach to strengthen retention in early childhood home visiting. Prevention Science, 17(1), 52–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S., Greenberg, M. T., Moon, C., & Margraf, P. (2007). Home visitor competence, burnout, support, and client engagement. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 15(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. L., Christensen, J. J., Shone, L. P., Kearney, M. H., & Kitzman, H. J. (2014a). Women’s reasons for attrition from a nurse home visiting program. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 43(1), 61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. L., Xia, Y., Kitzman, H. J., Dozier, A. M., & Olds, D. L. (2014b). Patterns of visit attendance in the Nurse–Family Partnership program. American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), e58–e65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Home Visiting Applied Research Collaborative. (n.d.). About precision home visiting. Retrieved from: https://www.hvresearch.org/precision-home-visiting/. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.

  • Keller, B. T., & Enders, C. K. (2017). Blimp software manual (version Beta 6.8). Los Angeles: CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korfmacher, J., O'Brien, R., Hiatt, S., & Olds, D. (1999). Differences in program implementation between nurses and paraprofessionals providing home visits during pregnancy and infancy: A randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health, 89(12), 1847–1851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Korfmacher, J., Green, B., Staerkel, F., Peterson, C., Cook, G., Roggman, L., et al. (2008). Parent involvement in early childhood home visiting. Child & Youth Care Forum, 37, 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, W. M., Katzev, A. R., & Pratt, C. C. (2003). Multi-level determinants of retention in a home-visiting child abuse prevention program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(4), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersky, J. P., Janczewski, C. E., & Topitzes, J. (2017). Rethinking the measurement of adversity: moving toward second-generation research on adverse childhood experiences. Child maltreatment, 22(1), 58–68.

  • O’Brien, R. A., Moritz, P., Luckey, D. W., McClatchey, M. W., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Olds, D. L. (2012). Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the Nurse-Family Partnership. Prevention Science, 13(3), 219–228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsell, D., Del Grosso, P., & Supplee, L. (2014). Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: Assessing the implementation knowledge base. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1624–1632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roggman, L. A., Cook, G. A., Peterson, C. A., & Raikes, H. H. (2008). Who drops out of early head start home visiting programs? Early Education and Development, 19(4), 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supplee, L. H., Kelly, B. C., MacKinnon, D. M., & Barofsky, M. Y. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Subgroup analysis in prevention and intervention research. Prevention Science, 14(2), 107–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, M. A., & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75(5), 1435–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Demonstrating improvement in the maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting program: A report to congress. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. H. (1993). Staffing issues for home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 140–157.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, the Wisconsin Department of Public Health, and the US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration award numbers 1X10MC29512-01-00 and 1D89MC26367-01-00.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen E. Janczewski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

This study was a secondary data analyses where formal consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(PDF 183 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 275 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janczewski, C.E., Mersky, J.P. & Brondino, M.J. Those Who Disappear and Those Who Say Goodbye: Patterns of Attrition in Long-Term Home Visiting. Prev Sci 20, 609–619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01003-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01003-7

Keywords

  • Home visiting
  • Attrition
  • Retention
  • Engagement