Adaptive Recruitment and Parenting Interventions for Immigrant Latino Families with Adolescents
Parenting programs are an effective strategy to prevent multiple risky outcomes during adolescence. However, these programs usually enroll one caregiver and have low attendance. This study evaluated the preliminary results, cost, and satisfaction of adaptive recruitment and parenting interventions for immigrant Latino families. A mixed methods study was conducted integrating a pre-post design with embedded qualitative and process evaluations. Fifteen immigrant Latino families with an adolescent child aged 10–14 were recruited. Two-caregiver families received a home visit to increase enrollment of both caregivers. All families participated in an adaptive parenting program that included group sessions and a one-to-one component (online videos plus follow-up telephone calls) for those who did not attend the group sessions. The intervention addressed positive parenting practices using a strengths-based framework. Primary outcomes were the proportion of two-parent families recruited and intervention participation. Secondary outcomes were change in parenting self-efficacy, practices, fidelity, costs, and satisfaction. Participants completed questionnaires and interaction tasks before and after participating in the intervention. In addition, participants and program facilitators completed individual interviews to assess satisfaction with the program components. Overall, 23 parents participated in the intervention; 73% of two-parent families enrolled with both parents. Most participants completed 75% or more of the intervention. Fathers were more likely to use the one-to-one component of the intervention than mothers (p = .038). Participants were satisfied with program modifications. In sum, adaptive recruitment and parenting interventions achieved high father enrollment and high participation. These findings warrant further evaluation in randomized trials.
KeywordsPersonalized medicine Prevention Parenting Latinos Adolescents
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Award at the University of Minnesota (8UL1TR000114-02) and by the University of Minnesota Mixed Methods Interdisciplinary Graduate Group Scholarship, the Institute for Translational Research Summer Fellowship and the Simer Research Funds from the Department of Pediatrics. Diego Garcia-Huidobro was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under National Research Service Award in Primary Medical Care grant number T32HP22239 (PI: Borowsky), Bureau of Health Workforce. This information, content, and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by NIH, HRSA, HHS, the U.S. Government, or the University of Minnesota. Authors would like to acknowledge Katherine Rojas-Jahn and Anna Vangsness from Children’s Hospital-Minneapolis, and Julia Graves from Pillsbury United Communities for supporting the implementation of the study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Hurtado, G. A., Allen, R., Davey, C. S., Forster, J. L., et al. (2012). Immigrant family skills-building to prevent tobacco use in Latino youth: Study protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial. Trials, 13(1), 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-242.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen, M. L., Hurtado, G. A., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Davey, C., Forster, J., Reynoso, U., et al. (2017a). Cultural contributors to smoking susceptibility outcomes among Latino youth: The Padres Informados/Jovenes Preparados participatory trial. Family & Community Health, 40(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Bastian, T., Hurtado, G. A., Linares, R., & Svetaz, M. V. (2017b). Reconciling research and community priorities in participatory trials: Application to Padres Informados/Jovenes Preparados. Family Practice, 34(3), 347–352.Google Scholar
- August, G. J., Gewirtz, A., & Realmuto, G. M. (2010). Moving the field of prevention from science to service: Integrating evidence-based preventive interventions into community practice through adapted and adaptive models. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2008.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Fact Sheet: Health risk behaviors by race/ethnicity. Atlanta.Google Scholar
- Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 5(3), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000037641.26017.00.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Díaz, S. A. H., Secades-Villa, R., Errasti Pérez, J. M., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., García-Rodríguez, O., & Carballo Crespo, J. L. (2006). Family predictors of parent participation in an adolescent drug abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230600741149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., Peterson, J., Winter, C. E., Jabson, J. M., & Hogansen, J. M. (2007). Family assessment task coder impressions: Unpublished coding manual. Portland: University of Oregon, Child and Family Center.Google Scholar
- Fischer, T., Langanke, M., Marschall, P., & Michl, S. (Eds.). (2015). Individualized medicine: Ethical, economical and historical perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., et al. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: A systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science, 7(1), 38: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Huidobro, D., Allen, M., Rosas-Lee, M., Maldonado, F., Gutierrez, L., Svetaz, M. V., & Wieling, E. (2016a). Understanding attendance in a community-based parenting intervention for immigrant Latino families. Health Promotion Practice, 17(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915582155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Huidobro, D., Allen, M. L., Doherty, W. J., Mendenhal, T.J., Wieling, E., Borowsky, I., … & Bastian, O. (2016b). Characteristics of parenting interventions for Latino families that could increase attendance of low attending participants. Proceedings from the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research. San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Garcia-Huidobro, D., Doty, J. L., Davis, L., Borowsky, I. W., & Allen, M. L. (2017). For whom do parenting interventions to prevent adolescent substance use work? Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0853-6.
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2014). Monitoring the future national results on drug use: 2013 overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (2012). Fast facts: Summary of 2010 preliminary data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Perou, R., Bitsko, R. H., Blumberg, S. J., Pastor, P., Ghandour, R. M., Gfroerer, J. C., et al. (2013). Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 62(Suppl 2), 1–35.Google Scholar