Adaptive Recruitment and Parenting Interventions for Immigrant Latino Families with Adolescents

  • Diego Garcia-Huidobro
  • Maria O. Diaspro-Higuera
  • Dora Palma
  • Roberto Palma
  • Luis Ortega
  • Rebecca Shlafer
  • Elizabeth Wieling
  • Timothy Piehler
  • Gerald August
  • Maria V. Svetaz
  • Iris W. Borowsky
  • Michele L. Allen
Article

Abstract

Parenting programs are an effective strategy to prevent multiple risky outcomes during adolescence. However, these programs usually enroll one caregiver and have low attendance. This study evaluated the preliminary results, cost, and satisfaction of adaptive recruitment and parenting interventions for immigrant Latino families. A mixed methods study was conducted integrating a pre-post design with embedded qualitative and process evaluations. Fifteen immigrant Latino families with an adolescent child aged 10–14 were recruited. Two-caregiver families received a home visit to increase enrollment of both caregivers. All families participated in an adaptive parenting program that included group sessions and a one-to-one component (online videos plus follow-up telephone calls) for those who did not attend the group sessions. The intervention addressed positive parenting practices using a strengths-based framework. Primary outcomes were the proportion of two-parent families recruited and intervention participation. Secondary outcomes were change in parenting self-efficacy, practices, fidelity, costs, and satisfaction. Participants completed questionnaires and interaction tasks before and after participating in the intervention. In addition, participants and program facilitators completed individual interviews to assess satisfaction with the program components. Overall, 23 parents participated in the intervention; 73% of two-parent families enrolled with both parents. Most participants completed 75% or more of the intervention. Fathers were more likely to use the one-to-one component of the intervention than mothers (p = .038). Participants were satisfied with program modifications. In sum, adaptive recruitment and parenting interventions achieved high father enrollment and high participation. These findings warrant further evaluation in randomized trials.

Keywords

Personalized medicine Prevention Parenting Latinos Adolescents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Award at the University of Minnesota (8UL1TR000114-02) and by the University of Minnesota Mixed Methods Interdisciplinary Graduate Group Scholarship, the Institute for Translational Research Summer Fellowship and the Simer Research Funds from the Department of Pediatrics. Diego Garcia-Huidobro was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under National Research Service Award in Primary Medical Care grant number T32HP22239 (PI: Borowsky), Bureau of Health Workforce. This information, content, and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by NIH, HRSA, HHS, the U.S. Government, or the University of Minnesota. Authors would like to acknowledge Katherine Rojas-Jahn and Anna Vangsness from Children’s Hospital-Minneapolis, and Julia Graves from Pillsbury United Communities for supporting the implementation of the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11121_2018_898_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
11121_2018_898_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 15 kb)
11121_2018_898_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 17 kb)
11121_2018_898_MOESM4_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 17 kb)
11121_2018_898_MOESM5_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 14 kb)
11121_2018_898_MOESM6_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 6 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Hurtado, G. A., Allen, R., Davey, C. S., Forster, J. L., et al. (2012). Immigrant family skills-building to prevent tobacco use in Latino youth: Study protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial. Trials, 13(1), 242.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-242.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M. L., Hurtado, G. A., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Davey, C., Forster, J., Reynoso, U., et al. (2017a). Cultural contributors to smoking susceptibility outcomes among Latino youth: The Padres Informados/Jovenes Preparados participatory trial. Family & Community Health, 40(2), 170–179.  https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Bastian, T., Hurtado, G. A., Linares, R., & Svetaz, M. V. (2017b). Reconciling research and community priorities in participatory trials: Application to Padres Informados/Jovenes Preparados. Family Practice, 34(3), 347–352.Google Scholar
  4. Almeida, J., Molnar, B. E., Kawachi, I., & Subramanian, S. V. (2009). Ethnicity and nativity status as determinants of perceived social support: Testing the concept of familism. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1852–1858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. August, G. J., Gewirtz, A., & Realmuto, G. M. (2010). Moving the field of prevention from science to service: Integrating evidence-based preventive interventions into community practice through adapted and adaptive models. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 14(1), 72–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2008.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Fact Sheet: Health risk behaviors by race/ethnicity. Atlanta.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 5(3), 185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000037641.26017.00.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, L. M., Nahum-Shani, I., & Almirall, D. (2014). Optimization of behavioral dynamic treatment regimens based on the sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART). Clinical Trials, 11(4), 426–434.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774514536795.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. De Los Reyes, A., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Discrepancies in adolescent–parent perceptions of the family and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(10), 1957–1972.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0533-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Díaz, S. A. H., Secades-Villa, R., Errasti Pérez, J. M., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., García-Rodríguez, O., & Carballo Crespo, J. L. (2006). Family predictors of parent participation in an adolescent drug abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 327–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230600741149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., Peterson, J., Winter, C. E., Jabson, J. M., & Hogansen, J. M. (2007). Family assessment task coder impressions: Unpublished coding manual. Portland: University of Oregon, Child and Family Center.Google Scholar
  13. Dishion, T. J., Forgatch, M., Van Ryzin, M., & Winter, C. (2012). The nonlinear dynamics of family problem solving in adolescence: The predictive validity of a peaceful resolution attractor. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16(3), 331–352.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumka, L. E., Prost, J., & Barrera Jr., M. (2002). The parental relationship and adolescent conduct problems in Mexican American and European American families. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 1(4), 37–57.  https://doi.org/10.1300/j398v01n04_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting, 12(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.638870.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134–2156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, T., Langanke, M., Marschall, P., & Michl, S. (Eds.). (2015). Individualized medicine: Ethical, economical and historical perspectives. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., et al. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: A systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science, 7(1), 38: 1-8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia-Huidobro, D., & Oakes, M. J. (2017). Squeezing observational data for better causal inference: Methods and examples for prevention research. International Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 96–105.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Huidobro, D., Allen, M., Rosas-Lee, M., Maldonado, F., Gutierrez, L., Svetaz, M. V., & Wieling, E. (2016a). Understanding attendance in a community-based parenting intervention for immigrant Latino families. Health Promotion Practice, 17(1), 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915582155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia-Huidobro, D., Allen, M. L., Doherty, W. J., Mendenhal, T.J., Wieling, E., Borowsky, I., … & Bastian, O. (2016b). Characteristics of parenting interventions for Latino families that could increase attendance of low attending participants. Proceedings from the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Garcia-Huidobro, D., Doty, J. L., Davis, L., Borowsky, I. W., & Allen, M. L. (2017). For whom do parenting interventions to prevent adolescent substance use work? Prevention Science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0853-6.
  23. Jackson, C. A., Henderson, M., Frank, J. W., & Haw, S. J. (2012). An overview of prevention of multiple risk behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Public Health, 34(suppl 1), i31–i40.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2014). Monitoring the future national results on drug use: 2013 overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. Kohane, I. S. (2015). Ten things we have to do to achieve precision medicine. Science, 349(6243), 37–38.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundahl, B. W., Tollefson, D., Risser, H., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2008). A meta-analysis of father involvement in parent training. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(2), 97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507309828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mikesell, L., Bromley, E., & Khodyakov, D. (2013). Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), e7–e14.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301605.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (2012). Fast facts: Summary of 2010 preliminary data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Olofsson, V., Skoog, T., & Tillfors, M. (2016). Implementing group based parenting programs: A narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 69, 67–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perou, R., Bitsko, R. H., Blumberg, S. J., Pastor, P., Ghandour, R. M., Gfroerer, J. C., et al. (2013). Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 62(Suppl 2), 1–35.Google Scholar
  31. Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science, 10(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0123-3.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Salinas, A., Smith, J. C., & Armstrong, K. (2011). Engaging fathers in behavioral parent training: Listening to fathers’ voices. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 26(4), 304–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2010.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shelleby, E. C., & Shaw, D. S. (2014). Outcomes of parenting interventions for child conduct problems: A review of differential effectiveness. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45(5), 628–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0431-5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Swift, J. K., Callahan, J. L., & Vollmer, B. M. (2011). Preferences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 155–165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20759.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Garcia-Huidobro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria O. Diaspro-Higuera
    • 2
  • Dora Palma
    • 3
  • Roberto Palma
    • 3
  • Luis Ortega
    • 4
  • Rebecca Shlafer
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Wieling
    • 5
  • Timothy Piehler
    • 5
  • Gerald August
    • 5
  • Maria V. Svetaz
    • 3
  • Iris W. Borowsky
    • 2
  • Michele L. Allen
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Family Medicine, School of MedicinePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Aqui Para Ti (Here For You) ClinicHennepin County Medical CenterMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.University of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Family Social ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  6. 6.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations