Prevention Science

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 642–651 | Cite as

The Closing Digital Divide: Delivery Modality and Family Attendance in the Pathways for African American Success (PAAS) Program

  • Velma McBride MurryEmail author
  • Cady Berkel
  • Na Liu


Although family-focused, evidence-based programs (EBPs) have the potential to reduce disparities in health and behavioral outcomes for youth, access to such programs is severely limited in the most affected areas, including African American communities in the rural South. As expanding the reach of EBPs is the primary goal of translational research, interest is growing in the potential of technology as a viable platform to disseminate services to areas with limited resources. To test whether African American families in the rural South would be willing to engage in a technology-based family-focused EBP to prevent adolescent risk behavior, we examined attendance using data from two arms of a three-arm community-based trial of the Pathways for African American Success (PAAS) program. In the overall study, sixth graders (N = 412) and their primary caregivers were randomly assigned to the following conditions: (a) in-person, small group sessions led by facilitators; (b) self-directed, technology-based sessions; or (c) a literature control with home-mailed educational materials. Results indicated that attendance was higher in the technology condition than in the small group condition. Parental age, education, and socioeconomic status did not limit attendance in the technology condition. We conclude from these results that the use of technology can be an acceptable strategy for disseminating parenting EBPs to African American families in the rural South.


Family-based prevention Adolescence Program attendance African Americans Rural technology Delivery modalities 



The authors gratefully thank Eryn Block and Misha Innis-Thompson for their editorial assistance, and Susan Paul and her technology team, Symbolene Systems, Inc., community research staff, families, and community partners who have assisted with and participated in the study.

Funding Information

Support was provided by MH063043 (PI: Murry).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Murry is the developer of PAAS. Berkel and Liu declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Allen, M. L., Garcia-Huidobro, D., Porta, C., Curran, D., Patel, R., Miller, J., & Borowsky, I. (2016). Effective parenting interventions to reduce youth substance use: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 138.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12, 126–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Barrera, M., Berkel, C., & Castro, F. G. (2017). Directions for the advancement of culturally adapted preventive interventions: Local adaptations, engagement, and sustainability. Prevention Science, 18, 640–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellis, J. M., Grimley, D. M., & Alexander, L. R. (2002). Feasibility of a tailored intervention targeting STD-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 378–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkel, C., Murry, V. M., Hurt, T. R., Chen, Y.-F., Brody, G. H., Simons, R. L., Cutrona, C., & Gibbons, F. X. (2009). It takes a village: Protecting rural African American youth in the context of racism. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 38, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkel, C., Murry, V. M., Roulston, K. J., & Brody, G. H. (2013). Understanding the art and science of implementation in the SAAF efficacy trial. Health Education, 113, 297–323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkel, C., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Brown, C. H., Gallo, C. G., Chiapa, A., Mauricio, A. M., & Jones, S. (2016). “Home practice is the program:” Parents’ practice of program skills as predictors of outcomes in the New Beginnings Program effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, online first.Google Scholar
  10. Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., Chen, Y.-F., Kogan, S. M., & Brown, A. C. (2006). Effects of family risk factors on dosage and efficacy of a family-centered preventive intervention for rural African Americans. Prevention Science, 7, 281–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, C. H., Mohr, D. C., Gallo, C., Mader, C., Palinkas, L., Wingood, G., Prado, G., Kellam, S. G., Pantin, H., Poduska, J., Gibbons, R., McManus, J., Ogihara, M., Valente, T., Wulczyn, F., Czaja, S., Sutcliffe, G., Villamar, J., & Jacobs, C. (2013). A computational future for preventing HIV in minority communities: How advanced technology can improve implementation of effective programs. JAIDS-Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 63, S72–S84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Diagnoses of HIV infection among adolescents and young adults in the United States and 6 dependent areas 2010–2014. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report (Vol. 21).Google Scholar
  13. Coatsworth, J. D., Duncan, L. G., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Retaining ethnic minority parents in a preventive intervention: The quality of group process. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 367–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillman Carpentier, F., Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., Meza, C. M., Dumka, L. E., Germán, M., & Genalo, M. T. (2007). Engaging Mexican origin families in a school-based preventive intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 521–546.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Donenberg, G. R., Paikoff, R., & Pequegnat, W. (2006). Introduction to the special section on families, youth, and HIV: Family-based intervention studies. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 869–873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang, L., & Schinke, S. P. (2013). Two-year outcomes of a randomized, family-based substance use prevention trial for Asian American adolescent girls. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 788–798.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M. (2000). The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 12, 273–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Flay, B. R. (2002). Positive youth development requires comprehensive health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 407–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey, F. E., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 265–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Health images and their effects on health behavior: Social comparison and social influence. In B. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 63–94). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Guyll, M., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2003). The effects of incentives and research requirements on participation rates for a community-based preventive intervention research study. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, W. B., Bishop, D. C., & Bryant, K. S. (2009). Using online components to facilitate program implementation: Impact of technological enhancements to all stars on ease and quality of program delivery. Prevention Science, 10, 66–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huen, J. M. Y., Lai, E. S. Y., Shum, A. K. Y., So, S. W. K., Chan, M. K. Y., Wong, P. W. C., Law, Y. W., & Yip, P. S. F. (2016). Evaluation of a digital game-based learning program for enhancing youth mental health: A structural equation modeling of the program effectiveness. JMIR Ment Health, 3, e46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kao, T. S., Gibbs, M. B., Clemen-Stone, S., & Duffy, S. (2013). A comparison of family interventions to address adolescent risky behaviors: A literature review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35, 611–637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller, S. N., & Brown, J. D. (2002). Media interventions to promote responsible sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 67–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., & Whiteside, H. O. (2003). Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention. Substance Use & Misuse, 38, 1759–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lightfoot, M., Comulada, W. S., & Stover, G. (2007). A computerized HIV-preventive intervention for adolescents: Indications of efficacy. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1027–1030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. McAdoo, H. P. (1997). Black families. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. McCurdy, K., & Daro, D. (2001). Parent involvement in family support programs: An integrated theory. Family Relations, 50, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minkler, M., & Fuller-Thomson, E. (2005). African American grandparents raising grandchildren: A national study using the Census 2000 American Community Survey. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B, S82–S92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1710–1721.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Murry, V. M., & Brody, G. H. (1999). Self-regulation and self-worth of Black children reared in economically stressed, rural, single mother-headed families: The contribution of risk and protective factors. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 458–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murry, V. M., & Brody, G. H. (2004). Partnering with community stakeholders: Engaging rural African American families in basic research and the Strong African American Families preventive intervention program. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 30, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Brody, G. H., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). The Strong African American Families program: Longitudinal pathways to sexual risk reduction. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 333–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Chen, Y.-F., Brody, G., Gibbons, F., & Gerrard, M. (2011). Intervention induced changes on parenting practices, youth self-pride and sexual norms to reduce HIV-related behaviors among rural African American youths. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40, 1147–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Pantin, H., & Prado, G. (2012). Family-based HIV prevention with African American and Latino youth. In W. Pequegnat & C. C. Bell (Eds.), Family and HIV/AIDS: Cultural and contextual issues in prevention and treatment (pp. 229–247). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Gibbons, F. X. (2014). A twelve-year longitudinal analysis of positive youth development among rural African American males. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrino, T., Estrada, Y., Huang, S., St. George, S., Pantin, H., Cano, M. Á., Lee, T. K., & Prado, G. (2016). Predictors of participation in an eHealth, family-based preventive intervention for Hispanic youth. Prevention Science, 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Schinke, S. P., Fang, L., Cole, K. C., & Cohen-Cutler, S. (2011). Preventing substance use among Black and Hispanic adolescent girls: Results from a computer-delivered, mother–daughter intervention approach. Substance Use & Misuse, 46, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoenfelder, E., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., & Ayers, T. S. (2012). Responsiveness to the Family Bereavement Program: What predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict? Prevention Science, 14, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwinn, T. M., Schinke, S. P., & Di Noia, J. (2010). Preventing drug abuse among adolescent girls: Outcome data from an Internet-based intervention. Prevention Science, 11, 24–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Soper, D. (2006-2011). Interaction v.1.7. Retrieved from
  44. Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., Fagan, A., Catalano, R. F., Pentz, M. A., Sloboda, Z., & Hawkins, J. D. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14, 319–351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Tennessee Health Equity Commission Health Disparities Elimination Report (2009). Tennessee Health Equity Commission. Nashvlle TN.Google Scholar
  46. Turk, M., & Robertson, G. (2000). Perceptual user interfaces (introduction). Communications of the ACM, 43, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). American Community Survey.Google Scholar
  48. Van Voorhees, B. W., Fogel, J., Pomper, B. E., Marko, M., Reid, N., Watson, N., Larson, J., Bradford, N., Fagan, B., Zuckerman, S., Wiedmann, P., & Domanico, R. (2009). Adolescent dose and ratings of an Internet-based depression prevention program: A randomized trial of primary care physician brief advice versus a motivational interview. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 9, 1–19.Google Scholar
  49. Vogl, L., Teesson, M., Andrews, G., Bird, K., Steadman, B., & Dillon, P. (2009). A computerized harm minimization prevention program for alcohol misuse and related harms: Randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 104, 564–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody CollegeVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.REACH Institute, Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations