Prevention Science

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 663–673 | Cite as

“Home Practice Is the Program”: Parents’ Practice of Program Skills as Predictors of Outcomes in the New Beginnings Program Effectiveness Trial

  • Cady Berkel
  • Irwin N. Sandler
  • Sharlene A. Wolchik
  • C. Hendricks Brown
  • Carlos G. Gallo
  • Amanda Chiapa
  • Anne M. Mauricio
  • Sarah Jones


An examination of the content and processes of evidence-based programs is critical for empirically evaluating theories about how programs work, the “action theory” of the program (West et al. in American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 571–605, 1993). The New Beginnings Program (NBP; Wolchik et al., 2007), a parenting-after-divorce preventive intervention, theorizes that program-induced improvements in parenting across three domains: positive relationship quality, effective discipline, and protecting children from interparental conflict, will reduce the negative outcomes that are common among children from divorced families. The process theory is that home practice of program skills related to these parenting domains is the primary mechanism leading to positive change in parenting. This theory was tested using multi-rater data from 477 parents in the intervention condition of an effectiveness trial of the NBP (Sandler et al. 2016a, 2016b). Four research questions were addressed: Does home practice of skills predict change in the associated parenting outcomes targeted by the program? Is the effect above and beyond the influence of attendance at program sessions? What indicators of home practice (i.e., attempts, fidelity, efficacy, and competence) are most predictive of improvements in parenting? Do these indicators predict parenting improvements in underserved subpopulations (i.e., fathers and Latinos)? Structural Equation Modeling analyses indicated that parent-reported efficacy and provider-rated parent competence of home practice predicted improvements in the targeted parenting domains according to both parent and child reports. Moreover, indicators of home practice predicted improvements in parenting for fathers and Latinos, although patterns of effects varied by parenting outcome.


Program implementation Program engagement Participant responsiveness Gender Ethnicity 


Compliance with Ethical Standards


Support for the study was provided by R01DA026874 (Sandler), R01DA033991 (Berkel & Mauricio), and competitive funding from the Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology (Ce-PIM), P30-DA027828 (Brown/Berkel), Diversity Supplement R01DA033991-03S1 (Berkel/Gallo), and SAMHSA’s Minority Fellowship Program SM060563-03 (Chiapa).

Conflict of Interest

Sandler and Wolchik are the developers of the NBP and have an LLC that trains providers to deliver the program. Remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Arizona State University’s IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11121_2016_738_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Appendix Table 1 (DOCX 19 kb)
11121_2016_738_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Appendix Table 2 (DOCX 17 kb)
11121_2016_738_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Appendix Table 3 (DOCX 17 kb)
11121_2016_738_MOESM4_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Appendix Table 4 (DOCX 24 kb)


  1. Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale. In D. H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 33–48). St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  3. Berkel, C., Knight, G. P., Zeiders, K. H., Tein, J.-Y., Roosa, M. W., Gonzales, N. A., & Saenz, D. (2010). Discrimination and adjustment for Mexican American adolescents: A prospective examination of the benefits of culturally-related values. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 893–915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkel, C., Murry, V. M., Roulston, K. J., & Brody, G. H. (2013). Understanding the art and science of implementation in the SAAF efficacy trial. Health Education, 113, 297–323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents experience in divorced homes. Child Development Perspectives, 62, 1008–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, A. T., Marshall, S. A., Mautone, J. A., Soffer, S. L., Jones, H. A., Costigan, T. E., Patterson, A., Jawad, A. F., & Power, T. J. (2015). Parent attendance and homework adherence predict response to a family–school intervention for children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (1998). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications. Developmental Review, 18, 47–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabricius, W. V., Braver, S. L., Diaz, P., & Velez, C. E. (2010). Custody and parenting time: Links to family relationships and well-being after divorce. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher, R., Freeman, E., & Matthey, S. (2011). The impact of behavioural parent training on fathers’ parenting: A meta-analysis of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Fathering, 9, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzales, N. A., Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., Winslow, E. B., Martinez, C. R., & Cooley, M. (2006). Quality management methods to adapt interventions for cultural diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  14. Gonzales, N. A., Dumka, L. E., Millsap, R. E., Gottschall, A., McClain, D. B., Wong, J. J., Germán, M., Mauricio, A. M., Wheeler, L., Carpentier, F. D., & Kim, S. Y. (2012). Randomized trial of a broad preventive intervention for Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 80, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottfredson, D., Kumpfer, K., Polizzi-Fox, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P., & Vilmenay, M. (2006). The Strengthening Washington D.C. Families Project: A randomized effectiveness trial of family-based prevention. Prevention Science, 7, 57–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict scale. Child Development, 63, 558–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holtrop, K., Parra-Cardona, J. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (2014). Examining the process of change in an evidence-based parent training intervention: A qualitative study grounded in the experiences of participants. Prevention Science, 15, 745–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 567–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kazantzis, N., Deane, F. P., & Ronan, K. R. (2004). Assessing compliance with homework assignments: Review and recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 627–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Knight, G. P., Roosa, M. W., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2009). Studying ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged populations: Methodological challenges and best practices. Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leve, L. D., & Fagot, B. I. (1997). Gender-role socialization and discipline processes in one- and two-parent families. Sex Roles, 36, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mausbach, B. T., Moore, R., Roesch, S., Cardenas, V., & Patterson, T. L. (2010). The relationship between homework compliance and therapy outcomes: An updated meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 34, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murry, V. M., Berkel, C., Brody, G. H., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). The Strong African American Families program: Longitudinal pathways to sexual risk reduction. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 333–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2012). Mplus, Version 7.1.. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  27. NRC/IOM. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington: NRC/IOM.Google Scholar
  28. OSLC. (1991). LIFT parent interview. Eugene: OSLC.Google Scholar
  29. Panter-Brick, C., Burgess, A., Eggerman, M., McAllister, F., Pruett, K., & Leckman, J. F. (2014). Practitioner review: Engaging fathers—Recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1187–1212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Pantin, H., Coatsworth, J. D., Feaster, D. J., Newman, F. L., Briones, E., Prado, G., Schwartz, S. J., & Szapocznik, J. (2003). Familias Unidas: The efficacy of an intervention to promote parental investment in Hispanic immigrant families. Prevention Science, 4, 189–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Riggs, N. R., Elfenbaum, P., & Pentz, M. A. (2006). Parent program component analysis in a drug abuse prevention trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 66–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ros, R., Hernandez, J., Graziano, P. A., & Bagner, D. M. (2016). Parent training for children with or at risk for developmental delay: The role of parental homework completion. Behavior Therapy, 47, 1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandler, I., Wolchik, S., Winslow, E. B., Mahrer, N. E., Moran, J. A., & Weinstock, D. (2012). Quality of maternal and paternal parenting following separation and divorce. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 85–122). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., Jones, S., Mauricio, A. M., Tein, J.-Y., & Winslow, E. (2016a). Effectiveness trial of the New Beginnings Program (NBP) for divorcing and separating parents: Translation from and experimental prototype to an evidence-based community service. In M. Israelashvili & J. L. Romano (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of international prevention science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J.-Y., Mazza, G. L., Gunn, H., & Jones, S. (2016b). Randomized effectiveness trial of a court-community-university collaboration to implement the New Beginnings Program to divorcing and separating families.Google Scholar
  36. Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s report of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoenfelder, E., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., & Ayers, T. S. (2012). Responsiveness to the Family Bereavement Program: What predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict? Prevention Science, 14, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. St. George, S. M., Huang, S., Vidot, D. C., Smith, J. D., Brown, C. H., & Prado, G. (2016). Factors associated with the implementation of the Familias Unidas intervention in a type 3 translational trial. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6, 105–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Umberson, D., & Williams, C. L. (1993). Divorced fathers: Parental role strain and psychological distress. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Todd, M. (1993). Probing the effects of individual components in multiple component prevention programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 571–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolchik, S., Sandler, I., Weiss, L., & Winslow, E. (2007). New Beginnings: An empirically-based program to help divorced mothers promote resilience in their children. In J. M. Briesmeister & C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Handbook of parent training: Helping parents prevent and solve problem behaviors (3rd ed., pp. 25–62). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J.-Y., Sandler, I. N., & Kim, H.-J. (2016). Developmental cascade models of a parenting-focused program for divorced families on mental health problems and substance use in emerging adulthood. Development & Psychopathology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.REACH Institute, Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology (Ce-PIM)Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations