The Role of Program-Supported Mentoring Relationships in Promoting Youth Mental Health, Behavioral and Developmental Outcomes
- 1.2k Downloads
This study examined the relationship between youth mentoring status and behavioral, developmental, and emotional outcomes for 859 youths aged 6–17 participating in a national survey of Big Brothers Big Sisters community mentoring relationships (MRs). Youth self-reported behaviors and mental health occurred at the baseline assessment (before being paired to a mentor) and at 18 months follow-up. Youth mentoring status was categorized as follows: (1) continuous MR less than 12 months (n = 131); (2) continuous MR 12 or more months (n = 253); (3) dissolved MR less than 12 months (n = 110); (4) dissolved MR 12 or more months (n = 70); 5) MR with a second mentor (re-matched; n = 83); and (6); never mentored (n = 212). Structural equation model results at 18 months revealed that mentored youths, especially those in MR lasting 12 or more months (continuous or dissolved), reported significantly fewer behavioral problems and fewer symptoms of depression and social anxiety than did non-mentored youths. They also reported stronger coping skills and emotional support from parents. Mentored girls and boys in long-term relationships experienced positive outcomes. Re-matched girls displayed better outcomes than did never-mentored girls while there was some evidence of harmful outcomes for re-matched boys. Threats to internal validity are examined including the possibility of pre-existing baseline differences between mentored and non-mentored youths. Implications for mentoring programs are discussed.
KeywordsEmotional problems Behavioral problems Developmental outcomes Youth mentoring programs
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Funding for this research was provided by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 81115 and MOP 130435). The authors are grateful for the kind support of BBBS of Canada and the participating agencies.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All study procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the CAMH Research Ethics Board and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual study participants.
- Achenbach, T. M., Becker, A., Dopfner, M., Heiervang, E., Roessner, V., Steinhausen, H.-C., & Rothenberger, A. (2008). Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: research findings, applications, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 251–275. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01867.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Canada. (2014). Big Brothers Big Sisters of Canada National Learning Center. http://www.bigbrothersbigsisters.ca/en/Home/default.aspx.
- Dolan, P., Brady, B., O’Regan, C., Russell, D., Canavan, J., & Forkan, C. (2011). Big brothers big sisters of Ireland: evaluation study. Report 1: RCT and implementation report. Galway: Child and Family Research Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway.Google Scholar
- Eddy, J.M., Herrera, D., Martinez, C.R., Grossman, J., Cearley, J.J., Harachi, T., Kjellstrand, J., Haggerty, K., Wheeler, A., Feldman, B., Seeley, J., & Gau, J. (2015). Twelve-year professional youth mentoring program for high risk youth: Continuation of a longitudinal randomized controlled trial. US Department of Justice. Document No. 248595.Google Scholar
- Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). Big Brothers/Big Sisters: a study of program practices. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
- Herrera, C., Sipe, L., & McClanahan, W. S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: relationship development in community and school-based programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
- Herrera, C., DuBois, D. L., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). The role of risk: mentoring experiences and outcomes for youth with varying risk profiles. New York, NY: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
- La Greca, A. M. (1999). Social anxiety scales for children and adolescents. Manual and instructions for SASC, SASC-R, SAS-A (adolescents) and parent versions of the scales. Miami, FL: Author.Google Scholar
- Liang, B., Bogat, A., & Duffy, N. (2013). Gender in mentoring relationships. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 159–175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Lymburner, J. (2006). Predictors of match duration in a Big Sisters mentoring program. (Ph.D. dissertation), Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/6640.
- Meyerson, D. A. (2013). Mentoring youth with emotional and behavioral problems: a meta-analytic review. (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)), DePaul University. Retrieved from http://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/56
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2011). M-plus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Authors. Version 6.11.Google Scholar
- Pryce, J., Kelly, M. S., & Guidone, S. R. (2013). Mentor and youth matching. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 427–439). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, J. (2002). Stand by me: the risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, J.E., Schwartz, S.E.O., Willis, M.M., & Wu, M.B. (2014). Validating a mentoring relationship quality scale: Does match strength predict match length? Youth and Society, 1-23, doi: 10.1177/0044118X14531604.
- Rodriguez-Planas, N. (2014). Do youth mentoring programs change the perspectives and improve the life opportunities of at-risk youth? IZA World of Labor, 62. doi: 10.15185/izawol.62
- Tolan, P. H., Henry, D. B., Schoeny, M. S., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2014). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: a comprehensive meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 179–206. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar