Reducing Children’s Susceptibility to Alcohol Use: Effects of a Home-Based Parenting Program
This 4-year efficacy trial tested whether a home-based, self-administered parenting program could have a long-term effect on children’s cognitive susceptibility to alcohol use, and it tested hypothesized moderators and mediators of any such program effect. Using a two-group randomized controlled design, 1076 children (540 treatment; 536 control; mean age of 9.2 years at baseline) completed telephone interviews prior to randomization and follow-up interviews 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post-baseline. Mothers of children randomized to treatment received a 5-month-long parenting program during year 1, followed by two 1-month-long boosters in years 2 and 3. Exposure to the program was significantly inversely associated with susceptibility to alcohol use 48 months post-baseline (b = −0.03, p = .04), with no variation in program effects by parental alcohol use or mother’s race/ethnicity or education, suggesting broad public health relevance of the parenting program. Path analyses of simple indirect effects through each hypothesized mediator showed that program exposure positively influenced parental communication to counter pro-drinking influences in the family and media domains and parental rule setting 36 months post-baseline; these variables, in turn, predicted reduced susceptibility to alcohol use 48 months post-baseline. Parallel (multiple) mediation analysis showed that the program had a significant indirect effect on susceptibility through parental rule setting. Together, the findings indicate that internalization of protective alcohol-related expectancies and intentions is possible among children whose mothers provide early exposure to alcohol-specific socialization. Additional research is needed to link alcohol-specific socialization during childhood with adolescent drinking outcomes.
KeywordsParenting Child Susceptibility Alcohol
Compliance with Ethical Standards
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Grant No. R01AA016300 (Christine Jackson, PI).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Cranford, J. A., Zucker, R. A., Jester, J. M., Puttler, L. I., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2010). Parental alcohol involvement and adolescent alcohol expectancies predict alcohol involvement in male adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 386–396. doi: 10.1037/a0019801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Foshee, V. A., Pemberton, M., & Hicks, K. A. (2001). Parent–child communication about adolescent tobacco and alcohol use: What do parents say and does it affect youth behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 48–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00048.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, H. L., & Johnson, P. B. (1995). Children’s alcohol-related cognitions—positive versus negative alcohol effects. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 40, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2010. Volume I: Secondary school students. Washington DC: Government Printing Office (NIH Publication No. 04–5507).Google Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & A. F. Snyder (Eds.), Advance data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Sobell, L., & Sobell, M. (2003). Alcohol consumption measures (NIH Publication No. 03–3745). In J. Allen & V. Wilson (Eds.), Assessing alcohol problems: A guide for clinicians and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 75–100). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Strasburger, V. C., & Wilson, B. J. (2002). Children, adolescents and the media. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Thomas, R. E., Baker, P. R. A., Thomas, B. C., & Lorenzetti, D. L. (2015). Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents. Retrieved from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). State and county quick facts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/37000.html.
- Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar