Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 544–553 | Cite as

AMP!: A Cross-site Analysis of the Effects of a Theater-based Intervention on Adolescent Awareness, Attitudes, and Knowledge about HIV

  • Tamara TaggartEmail author
  • Arianna Taboada
  • Judith A. Stein
  • Norweeta G. Milburn
  • David Gere
  • Alexandra F. Lightfoot
Article

Abstract

AMP! (Arts-based, Multiple component, Peer-education) is an HIV intervention developed for high school adolescents. AMP! uses interactive theater-based scenarios developed by trained college undergraduates to deliver messages addressing HIV/STI prevention strategies, healthy relationships, and stigma reduction towards people living with HIV/AIDS. We used a pre-test/post-test, control group study design to simultaneously assess intervention effect on ninth grade students in an urban county in California (N = 159) and a suburban county in North Carolina (N = 317). In each location, the control group received standard health education curricula delivered by teachers; the intervention group received AMP! in addition to standard health education curricula. Structural equation modeling was used to determine intervention effects. The post-test sample was 46 % male, 90 % self-identified as heterosexual, 32 % reported receiving free or reduced lunch, and 49 % White. Structural models indicated that participation in AMP! predicted higher scores on HIV knowledge (p = 0.05), HIV awareness (p = 0.01), and HIV attitudes (p = 0.05) at the post-test. Latent means comparison analyses revealed post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores on HIV knowledge (p = 0.001), HIV awareness (p = 0.001), and HIV attitudes (p = 0.001). Further analyses indicated that scores rose for both groups, but the post-test scores of intervention participants were significantly higher than controls (HIV knowledge (p = 0.01), HIV awareness (p = 0.01), and HIV attitudes (p = 0.05)). Thus, AMP!’s theater-based approach shows promise for addressing multiple adolescent risk factors and attitudes concerning HIV in school settings.

Keywords

HIV prevention Adolescents Sexual health Stigma reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Gordon for his leadership in the intervention delivery at both sites. The authors would also like to thank the youth who participated in this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

All data were collected as part of Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved studies directed by the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a developmental grant from the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) NIH funded program P30 AI50410, the AIDS Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), UCLA Center for AIDS Research (AI28697), the UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, NCRR and NCATS (UL1TR000124), and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UCLA CTSI Grant UL1TR000124. Additional support was provided by The Ford Foundation (Grant 1120-1496), the David and Linda Shaheen Foundation, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, and the Ueltschi course development grant from the University of North Carolina’s Center for Public Service’s APPLES Service-Learning Program. The participation of research assistant and doctoral candidate Tamara Taggart was supported by a fellowship from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (Award Number T32AI007001).

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. S., Sun, P., Rohrbach, L. A., & Sussman, S. (2011). Decision-making style and gender moderation of the self-efficacy–condom use link among adolescents and young adults: Informing targeted STI/HIV prevention programs. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 165, 320–325. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brener, N. D., Kann, L., Kinchen, S. A., Grunbaum, J. A., Whalen, L., Eaton, D., Hawkins J., & Ross, J. G. (2004). Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR). Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 53, no. RR-12: 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010a). Effective HIV and STD prevention programs for youth: A summary of scientific evidence. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sexualbehaviors/pdf/effective_hiv.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010b). Bringing high-quality HIV and STD prevention to youth in schools: CDC’s division of adolescent and school health. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/about/pdf/hivstd_prevention.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012a). Trends in HIV-related risk behaviors among high school students—United States, 1991–2011. Morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR) 61: 556–560. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6129a4.htm?s_cid=mm6129a4_w.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012b). Estimated HIV Incidence in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report, 17. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/index.html
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Youth risk behavior surveillanceUnited States 63. Atlanta, GA: Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services.Google Scholar
  11. Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model modification in covariance structure modeling: A comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 115–136. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Doan, A. E., & McFarlane, D. R. (2012). Saying no to abstinence-only education: An analysis of state decision-making. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, pjr052. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjr052.
  13. Douglas, K. (2007). Emerging answers 2007: New research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy—full report. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Retrieved from https://thenationalcampaign.org/resource/emerging-answers-full-report.Google Scholar
  14. Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action. In H. Howe & M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 65–118). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1989). Using the theory of reasoned action as a framework for understanding and changing AIDS-related behaviors. In V. M. Mays, G. W. Albee, & S. F. Schneider (Eds.), Primary prevention of AIDS: Psychological approaches (pp. 93–110). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Foster, D. W., Neighbors, C., & Young, C. M. (2014). Drink refusal self-efficacy and implicit drinking identity: An evaluation of moderators of the relationship between self-awareness and drinking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gavin, L. E., Catalano, R. F., David-Ferdon, C., Gloppen, K. M., & Markham, C. M. (2010). A review of positive youth development programs that promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, S75–S91. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.11.215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilamo-Ramos, V., Litardo, H. A., & Jaccard, J. (2005). Prevention programs for reducing adolescent problem behaviors: Implications of the co-occurrence of problem behaviors in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.12.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, A. (Ed.). (1993). Learning through theatre: New perspectives on theatre in education. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Joronen, K., Rankin, S. H., & Astedt-Kurki, P. (2008). School-based drama interventions in health promotion for children and adolescents: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63, 116–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04634.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2012). Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 141–163. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.2.141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Keogh-Brown, M. R., Bachmann, M. O., Shepstone, L., Hewitt, C., Howe, A., Ramsay, C. R., … & Campbell, M. J. (2007). Contamination in trials of educational interventions. Health Technology Assessment, 11. doi: 10.3310/hta11430.
  25. Kohler, P. K., Manhart, L. E., & Lafferty, W. E. (2008). Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lieberman, L. D., Berlin, C., Palen, L. A., & Ashley, O. S. (2012). A theater-based approach to primary prevention of sexual behavior for early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 730–753. doi: 10.1177/0272431611424726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lightfoot, A. F., Taboada, A., Taggart, T., Trang, T., & Burtaine, A. (2015). “I learned to be okay with talking about sex and safety”: Assessing the efficacy of a theater-based HIV prevention approach for adolescents in North Carolina. Sex Education. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2015.1025947.Google Scholar
  28. Lindberg, L. D., & Maddow-Zimet, I. (2012). Consequences of sex education on teen and young adult sexual behaviors and outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 332–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moss, H. B., Chen, C. M., & Yi, H. Y. (2014). Early adolescent patterns of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana polysubstance use and young adult substance use outcomes in a nationally representative sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 136, 51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moyer-Gusé, E., Mahood, C., & Brookes, S. (2011). Entertainment-education in the context of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communication, 26, 765–774. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.566832.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Muchimba, M., Haberstick, B. C., Corley, R. P., & McQueen, M. B. (2013). Frequency of alcohol use in adolescence as a marker for subsequent sexual risk behavior in adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mustanski, B., Byck, G. R., Dymnicki, A., Sterrett, E., Henry, D., & Bolland, J. (2013). Trajectories of multiple adolescent health risk behaviors in a low-income African American population. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1155–1169. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000436.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Kahihuata, J., Fitzgerald, A. M., Neumbo, S., Kanduuombe, G., … & Zimba, R. F. (1998). Increased protected sex and abstinence among Namibian youth following a HIV risk‐reduction intervention: A randomized, longitudinal study. AIDS, 12, 2473–2480. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199818000-00017.
  34. Stein, J. A., Lee, J. W., & Jones, P. S. (2006). Assessing cross-cultural differences through the use of multiple group invariance analyses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 249–258. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Taboada, A., Taggart, T., Holloway, I., Houpt, A., Milburn, N. G., Gordon, R., Gere, D. & Lightfoot, A. (2016). A critical review of the characteristics of theater-based HIV prevention interventions for adolescents in school settings. Health Promotion and Practice, in press.Google Scholar
  36. Vivolo, A. M., Holland, K. M., Teten, A. L., & Holt, M. K. (2010). Developing sexual violence prevention strategies by bridging spheres of public health. Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 1811–1814. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization. (1989). Interview schedule for knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices on AIDS of young people. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamara Taggart
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arianna Taboada
    • 2
  • Judith A. Stein
    • 2
  • Norweeta G. Milburn
    • 3
  • David Gere
    • 2
  • Alexandra F. Lightfoot
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC)Chapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Art & Global Health CenterUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Center for Health Promotion and Disease PreventionUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC)Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations