Prevention Science

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 538–549 | Cite as

Long-Term Effects of Staying Connected with Your Teen® on Drug Use Frequency at Age 20

  • Kevin P. Haggerty
  • Martie L. Skinner
  • Richard F. Catalano
  • Robert D. Abbott
  • Robert D. Crutchfield
Article

Abstract

Drug prevention interventions frequently target early adolescents in order to stop or delay initiation of substance use. However, the prevalence and frequency of drug use escalate and then peak during emerging adulthood, making it important to determine whether drug use prevention efforts in adolescence have lasting effects into adulthood. Additionally, given differences in drug use frequency between ethnic groups, intervention effects by race should be examined when possible. This study evaluates the efficacy of a family-focused prevention program, Staying Connected with Your Teen®, delivered to parents and teens in the 8th grade, on family stressors during 9th and 10th grades, 10th-grade drug use (as potential mediators), and drug use frequency at age 20. Families (N = 331; Black = 163, White = 168) were randomly assigned to three conditions: parent-adolescent group-administered (PA), self-administered with telephone support (SA), and no-treatment control (Haggerty et al. Prevention Science, 8: 249–260, 2007). The impact of the intervention was assessed using latent variable structural equation models. Age 20 drug use frequency was significantly higher among Whites than Blacks as expected. The PA intervention had direct effects on reducing drug use frequency for both Blacks and Whites. The SA intervention had an impact on family stressors during adolescence for Whites, but not for Blacks. Results suggest that both formats for delivery were modestly efficacious for Whites, but only direct delivery was modestly efficacious for Blacks. Given the substantial savings in cost of the self-administered program over the group-administered format, improving the efficacy of self-administered programming for Blacks is recommended.

Keywords

Substance use Prevention Emerging adults Race disparities 

Supplementary material

11121_2014_525_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 16.2 kb)

References

  1. Andrews, J. A., & Hops, H. (2010). The influence of peers on substance use. In L. M. Scheier (Ed.), Handbook of drug use etiology: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 403–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Antony, J., Nelson, D., McMahon, R. J., Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1996). Observer impressions. Retrieved from http://www.fasttrackproject.org
  3. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  4. Aos, S., Lee, S., Drake, E., Pennucci, A., Klima, T., Miller, M., & Burley, M. (2011). Return on investment: Evidence-based options to improve statewide outcomes—July 2011 update. #11-07-1201. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Johnston, L. D., Bryant, A. L., & Merline, A. C. (2002). The decline of substance use in young adulthood: Changes in social activities, roles, and beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S. T., Foshee, V. A., Pemberton, M., King, T. S., & Koch, G. G. (2000). Influence of a family-directed program on adolescent cigarette and alcohol cessation. Prevention Science, 1, 227–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauman, K. E., Foshee, V. A., Ennett, S. T., Pemberton, M., Hicks, K. A., King, T. S., & Koch, G. G. (2001). The influence of a family program on adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 604–610.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bontempo, D. E., & Hofer, S. M. (2006). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153–175). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brody, G. H., McBride Murry, V., Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Molgaard, V., McNair, L., & Neubaum-Carlan, E. (2004). The Strong African American Families Program: Translating research into prevention programming. Child Development, 75, 900–917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brody, G. H., Beach, S. R. H., Philibert, R. A., Chen, Y.-f., & McBride Murry, V. (2009). Prevention effects moderate the association of 5-HTTLPR and youth risk behavior initiation: Gene x environment hypotheses tested via a randomized prevention design. Child Development, 80, 645–661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Catalano, R. F., Gainey, R. R., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Johnson, N. O. (1999). An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: One-year follow-up of the Focus on Families project. Addiction, 94, 241–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Catalano, R. F., Park, J., Harachi, T. W., Haggerty, K. P., Abbott, R. D., & Hawkins, J. D. (2005). Mediating the effects of poverty, gender, individual characteristics, and external constraints on antisocial behavior: A test of the social development model and implications for developmental life-course theory. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Advances in criminological theory (Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending, Vol. 14, pp. 93–123). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  16. Catalano, R. F., Fagan, A. A., Gavin, L. E., Greenberg, M. T., Irwin, C. E., Ross, D. A., & Shek, D. T. L. (2012). Worldwide application of the prevention science research base in adolescent health. Lancet, 379, 1653–1664.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crnic, K. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (1990). Minor parenting stresses with young children. Child Development, 61, 1628–1637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dishion, T. J., Gardner, K., Patterson, G. R., Reid, J., Spyrou, S., & Thibodeaux, S. (1987). The Family Process Code: A multidimentional system for observing family interactions. Retrieved from http://www.oslc.org/resources/codemanuals/familyprocesscode.pdf
  20. Dishion, T. J., Burraston, B., & Li, F. (2003). Family management practices: Research design and measurement issues. In Z. Sloboda & W. Bukowski (Eds.), Handbook for drug abuse prevention: Theory, science, and practice (pp. 587–607). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Eyberg, S. M., & Robinson, E. A. (1983). Dyadic Parent-child Interaction Coding System (DPICS): A manual. Psychological Documents, 13(2) Ms. No. 2582.Google Scholar
  22. Fletcher, A. C., Steinberg, L., & Williams-Wheeler, M. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, 75, 781–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Foxcroft, D. R., & Tsertsvadze, A. (2011). Universal family-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD009308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorman-Smith, D., Tolan, P. H., Zelli, A., & Huesmann, L. (1996). The relation of family functioning to violence among inner-city minority youths. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood, P. W., Model, K. E., Rydell, C. P., & Chiesa, J. (1998). Diverting children from a life of crime: Measuring costs and benefits. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., MacKenzie, E. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2007). A randomized trial of Parents Who Care: Effects on key outcomes at 24-month follow-up. Prevention Science, 8, 249–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., McGlynn, A., Catalano, R. F., & Crutchfield, R. D. (2013). Parent and peer predictors of violent behavior of Black and White teens. Violence & Victims, 28, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins, J. D., & Weis, J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance-abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinrichs, N., & Jensen-Doss, A. (2010). The effects of incentives on families' long-term outcome in a parenting program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 705–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hops, H., Biglan, A., Tolman, A., Sherman, L., Arthur, J., Warner, P., & Osteen, V. (1990). Living in Familial Environments (LIFE) coding system: Training/procedures and reference manual for coders (Revth ed.). Eugene, OR: Oregon Research Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Inc, S. P. S. S. (2001). SPSS (version 10.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS Incorporated.Google Scholar
  33. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. (2011). The science of adolescent risk-taking: Workshop report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kacir, C. D., & Gordon, D. A. (1999). Parenting adolescents wisely: The effectiveness of an interactive videodisk parent training program in Appalachia. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kogan, S. M., Brody, G. H., Molgaard, V. K., Grange, C. M., Oliver, D. A. H., Anderson, T. N., & Sperr, M. C. (2012). The Strong African American Families–Teen Trial: Rationale, design, engagement processes, and family-specific effects. Prevention Science, 13, 206–217.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2001). Preparing for the Drug Free Years: Session-specific effects of a universal parent-training intervention with rural families. Journal of Drug Education, 31, 47–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P., & Bellamy, N. (2002). Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science, 3, 241–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindahl, K. M. (2001). Methodological issues in family observational research. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems (pp. 23–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Lord, F. M. (1965). A strong true-score theory, with applications. Psychometrika, 30, 239–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lundahl, B., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 86–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Markie-Dadds, C., & Sanders, M. R. (2006). Self-directed Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) for mothers with children at-risk of developing conduct problems. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mason, W. A., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Spoth, R. L. (2003). Reducing adolescents' growth in substance use and delinquency: Randomized trial effects of a preventive parent-training intervention. Prevention Science, 4, 203–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMahon, R. J. (1999). Parent training. In S. W. Rus & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapies with children and families (pp. 153–180). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McMahon, R. J., & Estes, A. M. (1993). Fast Track parent-child interaction task: Observational data collection manuals. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  46. McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (2005). Helping the noncompliant child: Family based treatment for oppositional behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Melby, J. N., Conger, R. D., Book, R., Rueter, M., Lucy, L., & Repinski, D. (1998). The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (5th ed.). Ames: Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  48. Metzler, C. W., Sanders, M. R., Rusby, J. C., & Crowley, R. N. (2012). Using consumer preference information to increase the reach and impact of media-based parenting interventions in a public health approach to parenting support. Behavior Therapy, 43, 257–270.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Moos, R., & Moos, B. (1983). Clinical applications of the Family Environment Scale. In E. Filsinger (Ed.), A sourcebook of marriage and family assessment (pp. 253–273). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrica, 54, 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  52. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2003). Drug use among racial/ethnic minorities, revised (NIH Publication No.03-3888). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  53. Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P System Population Trial. Prevention Science, 10, 1–12.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Romer, D., Stanton, B., Galbraith, J., Feigelman, S., Black, M. M., & Li, X. (1999). Parental influence on adolescent sexual behavior in high-poverty settings. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153, 1055–1062.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rusby, J. C., Estes, A., & Dishion, T. J. (1991). Manual for the Interpersonal Process Code. Retrieved from http://www.oslc.org
  56. Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M. T., & Markie-Dadds, C. (2002). The development and dissemination of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A multilevel, evidence-based system of parenting and family support. Prevention Science, 3, 173–189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2252–2259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skinner, M. L., Haggerty, K. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2009). Parental and peer influences on teen smoking: Are European and African American families different? Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skinner, M. L., MacKenzie, E. P., Haggerty, K. P., Hill, K. G., & Roberson, K. C. (2011). Observed parenting behavior with teens: Measurement invariance and predictive validity across race. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 252–260.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Spagnolo, B., DeLoach, C. M., Haggerty, K. P., Hill, K., Weaver-Randall, K., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002). The Social Development Model Observational Coding System. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Social Development Research Group.Google Scholar
  63. Spoth, R. L., Kavanagh, K. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2002). Family-centered preventive intervention science: Toward benefits to larger populations of children, youth, and families. Prevention Science, 3, 145–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Azevedo, K. (2004). Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: School-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 535–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wallace, J. M., & Muroff, J. R. (2002). Preventing substance abuse among African American children and youth: Race differences in risk factors exposure and vulnerability. Journal of Primary Prevention, 22, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0 to 8 Years). Prevention Science, 2, 165–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. White, A. M., Hingson, R. W., Pan, I. J., & Yi, H. Y. (2011). Hospitalizations for alcohol and drug overdoses in young adults ages 18–24 in the United States, 1999–2008: Results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72, 774–786.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Whittaker, K. A., & Cowley, S. (2012). An effective programme is not enough: A review of factors associated with poor attendance and engagement with parenting support programmes. Children and Society, 26, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, D. R., & Jackson, P. B. (2005). Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Affairs, 24, 325–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Winett, R. A., Anderson, E. S., Moore, J. F., Taylor, C. D., Hook, R. J., Webster, D. A., & Mundy, L. L. (1993). Efficacy of a home-based human immunodeficiency virus prevention video program for teens and parents. Health Education Quarterly, 20, 555–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Yoshikawa, H. (1994). Prevention as cumulative protection: Effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 28–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin P. Haggerty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martie L. Skinner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert D. Abbott
    • 1
    • 3
  • Robert D. Crutchfield
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Social Development Research Group, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Educational PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations