Effects of the Communities That Care Prevention System on Youth Reports of Protective Factors
- 817 Downloads
Many interventions seeking to reduce problem behaviors and promote healthy youth development target both risk and protective factors, yet few studies have examined the effect of preventive interventions on overall levels of protection community wide. In a community-randomized controlled trial, this study tested the effect of Communities That Care (CTC) on protective factors in 24 communities across seven states. Data on protective factors were collected from a panel of 4407 youths in CTC and control communities followed from grade 5 through grade 8. Hierarchical linear modeling compared mean levels of 15 protective factors derived from the social development model in CTC and control communities in grade 8, adjusted for individual and community characteristics and baseline levels of protective factors in grade 5. Global test statistics were calculated to examine effects on protection overall and by domain. Analyses across all protective factors found significantly higher levels of overall protection in CTC compared to control communities. Analyses by domain found significantly higher levels of protection in CTC than control communities in the community, school, and peer/individual domains, but not in the family domain. Significantly higher levels of opportunities for prosocial involvement in the community, recognition for prosocial involvement in school, interaction with prosocial peers, and social skills among CTC compared to control youth contributed to the overall and domain-specific results. This is consistent with CTC’s theory of change, which posits that strengthening protective factors is a mechanism through which CTC prevents behavior problems.
KeywordsProtective factors Prevention Community intervention Communities That Care Social development model Social development strategy
This work was supported by a research grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA015183), with co-funding from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, analysis, or preparation of data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Akers, R. L. (1977). Deviant behavior: a social learning approach (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Arthur, M. W., Ayers, C. D., Graham, K. A., & Hawkins, J. D. (2003). Mobilizing communities to reduce risks for drug abuse: a comparison of two strategies. In W. J. Bukoski & Z. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention. Theory, science and practice (pp. 129–144). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
- Arthur, M. W., Glaser, R. R., & Hawkins, J. D. (2005). Steps towards community-level resilience: community adoption of science-based prevention programming. In R. D. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in children, families, and communities: linking context to practice and policy (pp. 177–194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: a theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (Eds.). (2006). Saving children from a life of crime: early risk factors and effective interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Oxford, M. L., & Harachi, T. W. (2002). A test of generalizability of the social development model across gender and income groups with longitudinal data from the elementary school developmental period. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fraser, M. W., Kirby, L. D., & Smokowski, P. R. (2003). Risk and resilience in childhood. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood, an ecological perspective (pp. 13–66). Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2004). Communities That Care: prevention strategies guide. South Deerfield: Channing Bete.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Jr., & Associates. (1992a). Communities That Care: action for drug abuse prevention (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., Fagan, A. A., & Catalano, R. F. (2009). Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency: a test of Communities That Care. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 789–798.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Monahan, K. C., Abbott, R. D., Arthur, M. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the Communities That Care prevention system in a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 166, 141–148.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2002-2003). Common Core of Data (CCD) “Public elementary/secondary school universe survey” 2002-03 v.1a 2003-04 v.1a 2004-05 v.1b 2005-06 v.1a. Retrieved from www.uark.edu/ua/der/Digest/Demographics/FRL/072307_FRL.xls.
- Pittman, K. J., O’Brien, R., & Kimball, M. (1993). Youth development and resiliency research: making connections to substance abuse prevention. Report prepared for the center for substance abuse prevention. Washington, DC: Center for Youth Development and Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T., Jr. (2004). HLM 6: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Redmond, C., Spoth, R. L., Shin, C., Schainker, L. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Feinberg, M. (2009). Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through a community-university partnership. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 513–530.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schafer, J. L. (2000). NORM for windows 95/98/NT. University Park: Center for the Study and Prevention through Innovative Methodology at Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- Social Development Research Group. (2005-2007). Community youth development study, youth development survey [Grades 5-7]. Seattle: social development research group, school of social work, University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. H. (1973). Development of the theory [private paper published posthumously]. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Edwin Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 13–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Summary file 1. 2000 census of population and housing. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/sf1.pdf.