Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 705–715 | Cite as

Pre-college Matriculation Risk Profiles and Alcohol Consumption Patterns During the First Semesters of College

  • Jerod L. StapletonEmail author
  • Rob Turrisi
  • Michael J. Cleveland
  • Anne E. Ray
  • Shou-En Lu


Excessive alcohol consumption represents a significant concern on U.S. college campuses, and there is a need to identify students who may be at risk for engaging in risky alcohol use. The current study examined how variables measured prior to college matriculation, specifically alcohol-related decision-making variables drawn from the Theory of Reasoned Action (i.e., alcohol expectancies, attitudes, and normative beliefs), were associated with patterns of alcohol use prior to and throughout the first semesters of college. Participants were 392 undergraduate students (56 % female) from a large Northeastern U.S. university. Decision-making variables were assessed prior to college matriculation, and alcohol use was measured with five assessments before and throughout freshman and sophomore semesters. Latent profile analysis was used to identify types of students with distinct patterns of decision-making variables. These decision-making profiles were subsequently linked to distinct patterns of alcohol use using latent transition analysis. Four distinct decision-making profiles were found and were labeled “Anti-Drinking,” “Unfavorable,” “Mixed,” and “Risky.” Five drinking patterns were observed and included participants who reported consistently low, moderate, or high rates of alcohol use. Two patterns described low or non-drinking at the pre-college baseline with drinking escalation during the measurement period. Students’ likelihood of following the various drinking patterns varied according to their decision-making. Findings suggest the early identification of at-risk students may be improved by assessing decision-making variables in addition to alcohol use. The findings also have implications for the design of early identification assessments to identify at-risk college students and for the targeting of alcohol prevention efforts to students based on their alcohol-related attitudes and beliefs.


College students Alcohol Early identification 



This research was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) grant F31 AA018592 awarded to Jerod Stapleton, NIAAA grant R01 AA015737 to Rob Turrisi, and The Biometrics Shared Resource of Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (P30 CA072720).


  1. Baer, J. S. (1994). Effects of college residence on perceived norms for alcohol consumption: An examination of the first year in college. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8, 43–50. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.8.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M. L. (1991). Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52, 580–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borsari, B., Murphy, J. G., & Barnett, N. P. (2007). Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college: Implications for prevention. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2062–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.017.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borsari, B., Neal, J., Collins, S. E., & Carey, K. B. (2001). Differential utility of three indexes of risky drinking for predicting alcohol problems in college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 321–324. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.15.4.321.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212. doi: 10.1007/BF01246098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coffman, D. L., Patrick, M. E., Palen, L. A., Rhoades, B. L., & Ventura, A. K. (2007). Why do high school seniors drink? Implications for a targeted approach to intervention. Prevention Science, 8, 241. doi: 10.1007/s11121-007-0078-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, S. E., & Carey, K. B. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of heavy episodic drinking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 498–507. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.4.498.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2011). Individual-level focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking. Alcohol Research & Health, 34, 210–221. doi: SPS-AR&H-33.Google Scholar
  10. DeJong, W., Schneider, S. K., Towvim, L. G., Murphy, M. J., Doerr, E. E., Simonsen, N. R., & Scribner, R. A. (2006). A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 868–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Reis-Bergan, M., Trudeau, L., Vande Lune, L. S., & Buunk, B. (2002). Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. Health Psychology, 21(6), 601–609. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.21.6.601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Greenbaum, P. E., Del Boca, F. K., Darkes, J., Wang, C., & Goldman, M. S. (2005). Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshmen college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 229. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hingson, R. W., Zha, W., & Weitzman, E. R. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement No. 16, 12–20.Google Scholar
  16. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Implications of behavioral decision theory and social marketing for designing social action programs. In J. Edwards et al. (Eds.), Social influence processes and prevention (pp. 103–142). New York: Springer Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, A. C., Ahn, D. F., Atienza, A. A., & Kraemer, H. C. (2008). Exploring refinements in targeted behavioral medicine intervention to advance public health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 251–260. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9032-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, J. R., Wechsler, H., Kuo, M., Siebring, M., Weitzman, E. R., & Schuckit, M. A. (2002). Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 263–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kypri, K., Hallett, J., Howat, P., McManus, A., Maycock, B., Bowe, S., & Horton, N. J. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1508–1514. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanza, S. T., & Collins, L. M. (2006). A mixture model of discontinuous development in heavy drinking from ages 18 to 30: The role of college enrollment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Larimer, M. E., Lee, C. M., Kilmer, J. R., Fabiano, P., Stark, C., Geisner, I. M., & Neighbors, C. (2007). Personalized mailed feedback for drinking prevention: One year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 285–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.285.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Larimer, M. E., & Cronce, J. M. (2002). Identification, prevention, and treatment: A review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, 148–163.Google Scholar
  23. Larimer, M. E., Turner, A. P., Mallett, K. A., & Geisner, I. M. (2004). Predicting drinking behavior and alcohol-related problems among fraternity and sorority members: Examining the role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.006.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. doi: 10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Musher-Eizenman, D. R., & Kulick, A. D. (2003). An alcohol expectancy-challenge prevention program for at-risk college women. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 163–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  29. National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2012). College drinking. Retrieved from:
  30. O'Connor, R. M., & Colder, C. R. (2005). Predicting alcohol patterns in first-year college students through motivational systems and reasons for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 10–20. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Read, J. P., Wood, M. D., Davidoff, O. J., McLacken, J., & Campbell, J. F. (2002). Making the transition from high school to college: The role of alcohol-related social influence factors in students' drinking. Substance Abuse, 23, 53–65. doi: 10.1080/08897070209511474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2002). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): A review of recent research. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 272–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Saitz, R., Palfai, T. P., Freedner, N., Winter, M. R., Macdonald, A., Lu, J., & Dejong, W. (2007). Screening and brief intervention online for college students: The ihealth study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 42, 28–36. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agl092.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. doi: 10.1177/014662168400800412.Google Scholar
  35. Turrisi, R. (1999). Cognitive and attitudinal factors in the analysis of alternatives to binge drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1510–1533.Google Scholar
  36. Turrisi, R., Abar, C., Mallett, K. A., & Jaccard, J. (2010). An examination of the meditational effects of cognitive and attitudinal factors of a parent intervention to reduce college drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2500–2526.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Turrisi, R., Jaccard, J., Taki, R., Dunnam, H., & Grimes, J. (2001). Examination of the short-term efficacy of a parent intervention to reduce college student drinking tendencies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 366–372. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.15.4.366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Turrisi, R., Larimer, M., Mallett, K., Kilmer, J. R., Ray, A. E., Mastroleo, N. R., & Montoya, I. (2009). A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 555–567.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Turrisi, R., Mallett, K. A., Cleveland, M., Varvil-Weld, L., Abar, C., Scaglione, N., & Hultgren, B. (2013). An evaluation of timing and dosage of a parent based intervention to minimize college students’ alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74, 30–40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Walters, S. T., Vader, A. M., & Harris, T. R. (2007). A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prevention Science, 8, 83–88. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0059-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerod L. Stapleton
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Rob Turrisi
    • 2
  • Michael J. Cleveland
    • 2
  • Anne E. Ray
    • 1
  • Shou-En Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Population SciencesRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations