Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 694–704 | Cite as

Short-Term Effects on Substance Use of the Keepin’ It REAL Pilot Prevention Program: Linguistically Adapted for Youth in Jalisco, Mexico

  • Flavio F. Marsiglia
  • Jaime M. BoothEmail author
  • Stephanie L. Ayers
  • Bertha L. Nuño-Gutierrez
  • Stephen Kulis
  • Steven Hoffman
Article

Abstract

This article presents the short-term effects of a pilot study of keepin’it REAL (Manténte REAL) conducted in central Mexico by a binational team of investigators. This middle school-based model program for preventing substance use was adapted for Mexico linguistically but not culturally. Two Guadalajara public middle schools were recruited and randomly assigned to either implement the prevention program or serve as a control site. The program was implemented in the treatment site by the students’ regular teachers, who were trained by the research team. Seventh graders in ten classrooms in the treatment and control schools (N = 432) completed a pretest and posttest survey in Spanish similar to the survey utilized in the original efficacy trial of keepin’it REAL in the US. T-tests and OLS regressions were conducted to determine the effects of the intervention on substance use outcomes. Differences between treatment and control groups in frequency of use of alcohol and tobacco, the two substances of choice in this sample, were significant and in the desired direction. Differences in amount of use were also in the preferred direction but were not significant for alcohol and only marginally significant for tobacco. When the sample was split by gender, statistically significant treatment effects remained for females but were not observed among males. Effects of the linguistically adapted version of keepin’it REAL appears to be driven by the change in female use; however, the difference in male and female outcomes was not statistically significant. Implications for cultural adaptation and prevention in Mexico are discussed from a communication competency perspective. The promising results of the pilot study suggest that the linguistic adaptation was effective, but that a comprehensive cultural adaptation of keepin’it REAL in partnership with Mexican investigators and communities may be warranted.

Keywords

Substance use prevention Randomized control trial Mexico Adolescents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data collection for this study was made possible through the Global Health Initiative of the Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center (SIRC) funded by Arizona State University. Data analysis and manuscript development were supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health (Grant P20MD002316-05, to Flavio F. Marsiglia, principal investigator). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Arizona State University, the NIMHD or the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Alberts, J. K., Miller-Rassulo, M. A., & Hecht, M. L. (1991). A typology of drug resistance strategies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alducin, A. E., Blancarte, R. J., Castrejón, D. J., Cossío, J. R., Díaz-Guerrero, R., Flores, J. I., et al. (2004). Los valores de los Mexicanos Cambio y References permanencia. México: Tomo V Grupo Financiero Banamex.Google Scholar
  3. Alonso Castillo, M. M., Esparza Almanza, S., Frederickson, K., Guzmán Facundo, F. R., & Martínez Maldonado, R. (2011). Efecto de una intervención para prevenir el consumo de alcohol y tabaco en adolescentes de escuelas secundarias de Monterrey, México. Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo, 10, 79–92.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez-Gayou, J. (2007). Sexuality? Education at home or at school? Mexico: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arenas-Monreal, L., Bonilla-Fernández, P., Abril-Valdez, E., Hernández Pérez, H., Cuevas-Bahena, C., & Jasso-Victoria, R. (2010). Intervención educativa con escolares para prevenir el tabaquismo. Neumologia y Cirugía de Tórax, 69, 195–199.Google Scholar
  6. Arillo-Santillán, E., Fernández, E., Hernández-Ávila, M., Tapia-Uribe, M., Cruz-Valdés, A., & Lazcano-Ponce, E. C. (2002). Prevalencia de tabaquismo y bajo desempeño escolar, en estudiantes de 11 a 24 años de edad del estado de Morelos, México. Salud Pública De México, 44, S54–S66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Consejo Nacional Contra las Adicciones. (2003). Modelos preventivos. México: Secretaría de Salud.Google Scholar
  8. Díaz-Olavarrieta, C. (2010). Abortion and women’s roles in society: Opinions from Tlaxcala, Mexico. Salud Pública De México, 52, 52–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Félix-Ortiz, M., Velázquez, J. A. V., Medina-Mora, M. E., & Newcomb, M. D. (2001). Adolescent drug use in Mexico and among Mexican American adolescents in the United States: Environmental influences and individual characteristics. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 27–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Griner, D., & Smith, T. B. (2006). Culturally adapted mental health intervention: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 531–548.Google Scholar
  11. Gosin, M., Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2003). Keepin’ it REAL: a drug resistance curriculum tailored to the strengths and needs of preadolescents of the southwest. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 119–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hecht, M. L., Alberts, J., & Miller-Rassulo, M. (1992). Resistance to drug offers among college students. Substance Use & Misuse, 27, 995–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hecht, M. L., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Wagstaff, D. A., Kulis, S., Dustman, P., et al. (2003). Culturally grounded substance use prevention: An evaluation of the keepin’it REAL curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 233–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hecht, M. L., & Ribeau, S. (1984). Ethnic communication: a comparative analysis of satisfying communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía de México. (2011). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010 [National Census of Mexico 2010]. México, México: INEGI.Google Scholar
  16. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. (2008). Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones 2008 [National Survey of Addictions, 2008]. México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública INSP, Consejo Nacional contra las Adicciones CONADIC, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente, Fundación González Río Arronte IAP.Google Scholar
  17. Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Ayers, S. L., Booth, J., & Nuño-Gutiérrez, B. L. (2012). Drug resistance and substance use among male and female adolescents in alternative secondary schools in Guanajuato, Mexico. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 111–119.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Ayers, S. L., Calderón-Tena, C. O., & Nuño-Gutiérrez, B. L. (2011). Gender differences in drug resistance skills in youth in Guanajuato, Mexico. Journal of Primary Prevention, 32, 113–127.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Elek, E., Dustman, P., Wagstaff, D. A., & Hecht, M. L. (2005). Mexican/Mexican American adolescents and keepin’ it REAL: An evidence-based substance use prevention program. Children and Schools, 27, 133–145.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Lingard, E. C., Nieri, T., & Nagoshi, J. (2008). Gender identity and substance use among students in two high schools in Monterrey, Mexico. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, 258–268.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Latimer, W., Floyd, L. J., Kariis, T., Novotna, G., Exnerova, P., & O’Brien, M. (2004). Peer and sibling substance use: predictors of substance use among adolescents in Mexico. Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública, 15, 225–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2005). Keepin’ it REAL: an evidence-based program. Santa Cruz, CA: ETR Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Marsiglia, F. F., & Booth, J. (2013). Empirical status of culturally competent practices. In M. G. Vaughn & B. E. Perron (Eds.), Social Work Practice in the Addictions (pp. 165–181). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Medina-Mora, M. E., & Rojas Guiot, E. (2003). Mujer, probeza, y adicciones. Perinatolgia y Reproducción Humana, 17, 230–244.Google Scholar
  25. Mendoza Flores, M. E., Sánchez Jiménez, B., García Cardona, M., & Ávila Rosas, H. (2002). Morbilidad percibida y control prenatal. Estudio de campo. Perinatología y Reproducción Humana, 16, 26–34.Google Scholar
  26. Nuño-Gutiérrez, B. L., Álvarez-Nemegye, J., & Madrigal-de León, E. A. (2008). Efecto de una intervención anti-tabaco en estudiantes de enseñanza media superior en Guadalajara México. Salud Mental, 31, 181–188.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2011). Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en.
  28. Rogler, L. H. (1989). The meaning of culturally sensitive research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 296–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 71–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zorrilla Fierro, M. (2008). Final Report of Evaluation of the National Program Safe School (PNES). Retrieved from http://www.coneval.gob.mx/Informes/Evaluacion/Diseno/Diseno_2008/SEP/EDS_08_SEP_ADICCIONES.pdf.
  33. World Health Organization. (2009). Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  34. World Health Organization (2011). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2011. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/profiles/mex.pd.
  35. Wright, A. J., Nichols, T. R., Graber, J. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Botvin, G. J. (2004). It’s not what you say, it’s how many different ways you can say it: Links between divergent peer resistance skills and delinquency a year later. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 380–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flavio F. Marsiglia
    • 1
  • Jaime M. Booth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephanie L. Ayers
    • 2
  • Bertha L. Nuño-Gutierrez
    • 3
  • Stephen Kulis
    • 4
  • Steven Hoffman
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Social Work, Southwest Interdisciplinary Research CenterArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Southwest Interdisciplinary Research CenterArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  3. 3.University of Guadalajara and Mexican Social Security InstituteGuadalajaraMexico
  4. 4.Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  5. 5.School of Social WorkUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations