Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 654–662 | Cite as

Using Mixed Methods Effectively in Prevention Science: Designs, Procedures, and Examples

  • Wanqing ZhangEmail author
  • Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
Article

Abstract

There is growing interest in using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to generate evidence about the effectiveness of health prevention, services, and intervention programs. With the emerging importance of mixed methods research across the social and health sciences, there has been an increased recognition of the value of using mixed methods for addressing research questions in different disciplines. We illustrate the mixed methods approach in prevention research, showing design procedures used in several published research articles. In this paper, we focused on two commonly used mixed methods designs: concurrent and sequential mixed methods designs. We discuss the types of mixed methods designs, the reasons for, and advantages of using a particular type of design, and the procedures of qualitative and quantitative data collection and integration. The studies reviewed in this paper show that the essence of qualitative research is to explore complex dynamic phenomena in prevention science, and the advantage of using mixed methods is that quantitative data can yield generalizable results and qualitative data can provide extensive insights. However, the emphasis of methodological rigor in a mixed methods application also requires considerable expertise in both qualitative and quantitative methods. Besides the necessary skills and effective interdisciplinary collaboration, this combined approach also requires an open-mindedness and reflection from the involved researchers.

Keywords

Prevention science Prevention research Mixed methods Designs Procedures 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. J. (Eds.). (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, T., Lovell, K., Bee, P., & Campbell, M. (2010). The development and evaluation of a complex health education intervention for adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17, 473–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012a). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data, 1997–2010. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012b). MMWR weekly: Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6103a1.htm?s_cid=mm6103a1_w.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 612–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DeVoe, J. E., Graham, A. S., Angier, H., Baez, A., & Krois, L. (2008). Obtaining health care services for low-income children: A hierarchy of needs. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 19, 1192–1121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas, F. C., Gray, D. A., & van Teijlingen, E. R. (2010). Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people. BMC Health Services Research. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-49.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekwueme, D. U., Gardner, J. G., Subramanian, S., Tangka, F. K., Bapat, B., & Richardson, L. C. (2008). Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Selected states, 2003 to 2004. Cancer, 112, 626–635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Esposito, D., Taylor, E. F., & Gold, M. (2009). Using qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate small-scale disease management pilot programs. Population Health Management, 12, 3–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gipson, J. D., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). Having another child would be a life or death situation for her: Understanding pregnancy termination among couples in rural Bangladesh. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1827–1832.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed-methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemaire, J. B., & Wallace, J. E. (2010). Not all coping strategies are created equal: A mixed methods study exploring physicians’ self reported coping strategies. BMC Health Services Research. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-208.Google Scholar
  18. Halcomb, E. J., Andrew, S., & Brannen, J. (2009). Introduction to mixed methods research in nursing and the health science. In S. Andrew & E. J. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health science (pp. 3–12). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, T., Robinson, G., Condon, J., & Trauer, T. (2009). Approach to treatment of mental illness and substance dependence in remote Indigenous communities: Results of a mixed methods study. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 14, 17–24.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, I., Ridenour, C., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P., Jr. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Oakley, A., Strange, V., Bonell, C., Allen, E., Stephenson, J., & Team, R. S. (2006). Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332, 413–416.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Cathain, A. (2009). Mixed methods research in the health sciences: A quite revolution. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Padgett, D. K. (2004). Mixed methods, serendipity, and concentration. In D. K. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (pp. 273–288). Belmont: Wadswoth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  25. Puschel, K., & Thompson, B. (2011). Mammogram screening in Chile: Using mixed methods to implement health policy planning at the primary care level. Breast, 20, S40–45.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruffin, M. T., IV, Creswell, J. W., Jimbo, M., & Fetters, M. D. (2009). Factors influencing choices for colorectal cancer screening among previously unscreened African and Caucasian Americans: Findings from a triangulation mixed methods investigation. Journal of Community Health, 34, 79–89.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahin-Hodoglugil, N. N., van der Straten, A., Cheng, H., Montgomery, E. T., Kacanek, D., Mtetwa, S., et al. (2009). Degrees of disclosure: A study of women’s covert use of the diaphragm in an HIV prevention trial in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1547–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Whitley, R. (2007). Mixed-methods studies. Journal of Mental Health, 16, 697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woltmann, E. M., & Whitley, R. (2007). The role of staffing stability in the implementation of integrated dual disorders treatment: An exploratory study. Journal of Mental Health, 16, 757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13, 41–47.Google Scholar
  32. Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed methods embedded design in medical education, mental health and health services research: A methodological analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. 3487306).Google Scholar
  33. Zhang, W., & Creswell, J. W. (2012). The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Medical Care. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, College of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations