Using Mixed Methods Effectively in Prevention Science: Designs, Procedures, and Examples
- 986 Downloads
There is growing interest in using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to generate evidence about the effectiveness of health prevention, services, and intervention programs. With the emerging importance of mixed methods research across the social and health sciences, there has been an increased recognition of the value of using mixed methods for addressing research questions in different disciplines. We illustrate the mixed methods approach in prevention research, showing design procedures used in several published research articles. In this paper, we focused on two commonly used mixed methods designs: concurrent and sequential mixed methods designs. We discuss the types of mixed methods designs, the reasons for, and advantages of using a particular type of design, and the procedures of qualitative and quantitative data collection and integration. The studies reviewed in this paper show that the essence of qualitative research is to explore complex dynamic phenomena in prevention science, and the advantage of using mixed methods is that quantitative data can yield generalizable results and qualitative data can provide extensive insights. However, the emphasis of methodological rigor in a mixed methods application also requires considerable expertise in both qualitative and quantitative methods. Besides the necessary skills and effective interdisciplinary collaboration, this combined approach also requires an open-mindedness and reflection from the involved researchers.
KeywordsPrevention science Prevention research Mixed methods Designs Procedures
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Andrew, S., & Halcomb, E. J. (Eds.). (2009). Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012a). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data, 1997–2010. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012b). MMWR weekly: Cancer screening—United States, 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6103a1.htm?s_cid=mm6103a1_w.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed-methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Halcomb, E. J., Andrew, S., & Brannen, J. (2009). Introduction to mixed methods research in nursing and the health science. In S. Andrew & E. J. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health science (pp. 3–12). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Nagel, T., Robinson, G., Condon, J., & Trauer, T. (2009). Approach to treatment of mental illness and substance dependence in remote Indigenous communities: Results of a mixed methods study. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 14, 17–24.Google Scholar
- Newman, I., Ridenour, C., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P., Jr. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Padgett, D. K. (2004). Mixed methods, serendipity, and concentration. In D. K. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (pp. 273–288). Belmont: Wadswoth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
- Ruffin, M. T., IV, Creswell, J. W., Jimbo, M., & Fetters, M. D. (2009). Factors influencing choices for colorectal cancer screening among previously unscreened African and Caucasian Americans: Findings from a triangulation mixed methods investigation. Journal of Community Health, 34, 79–89.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13, 41–47.Google Scholar
- Zhang, W. (2011). Mixed methods embedded design in medical education, mental health and health services research: A methodological analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Publication No. 3487306).Google Scholar