Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 663–673 | Cite as

The Measurement Properties of Mentoring Relationship Quality Scales for Mentoring Programs

  • Annalise FerroEmail author
  • Samantha Wells
  • Kathy Nixon Speechley
  • Ellen Lipman
  • David DeWit
Article

Abstract

The measurement properties of two new scales designed to measure global and engagement mentoring relationship quality (Global Mentoring Relationship Quality Scale and Quality of Mentoring Relationship Engagement Scale) were examined among 272 mentors, 491 children, and 554 parents participating in Big Brothers Big Sisters community mentoring programs across Canada. Results demonstrated their unidimensionality, moderate convergent validity, good external validity, and weak-to-moderate reporter concordance. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated good predictive validity of mentor and parent mentoring relationship quality scales with respect to predicting mentoring relationship status.

Keywords

Mentoring relationship quality Reliability Internal validity External validity Reporter concordance 

Supplementary material

11121_2013_392_MOESM1_ESM.doc (50 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 50 kb)
11121_2013_392_MOESM2_ESM.doc (30 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 30 kb)
11121_2013_392_MOESM3_ESM.doc (28 kb)
ESM 3 (DOC 28 kb)

References

  1. Allison, P. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavell, T., Elledge, L., Malcolm, K., Faith, M., & Hughes, J. (2009). Relationship quality and the mentoring of aggressive, high-risk children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 185–198.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavell, T., & Hughes, J. (2000). Secondary prevention as context for assessing change processes in aggressive children. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeWit, D., Lipman, E., Bisanz, J., Da Costa, J., Graham, K., LaRose, … Shaver, K. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of the effects of adult mentoring on children's health and well-being: An examination of the Big Brothers Big Sisters community match program: Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant #81115.Google Scholar
  7. DeWit, D., Lipman, E., Manzano-Munguia, M., Bisanz, J., Graham, K., Offord, D., O'Neill, E., Pepler, D., & Shaver, K. (2007). Feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters community match program at the national level. Child and Youth Services Review, 29, 383-404.Google Scholar
  8. DuBois, D., & Neville, H. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 57–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eby, L., Allen, T., Evans, S., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentoring and non-mentoring individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254–267.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Elledge, L., Cavell, T., Ogle, N., & Newgent, R. (2010). School-based mentoring as selective prevention for bullied children: A preliminary test. Journal of Primary Prevention, 31, 171–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, J., & Nakkula, M. (2008). Match characteristics questionnaire (MCQ) [self-administered questionnaire]. Unpublished instrument. Available from http://www.mentoringevaluation.com.
  13. Harris, J., & Nakkula, M. (2010). Youth mentoring survey (Yersion 1.23) [self-administered questionnaire]. Unpublished instrument. Available from http://www.mentoringevaluation.com.
  14. Hatcher, L. (1994). Chapter 1: The basics of principal component analysis. In A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS PublishingGoogle Scholar
  15. Herrera, C., Sipe, C., & McClanahan, W. (2000). Mentoring school-aged children: Relationship development in community-based and school-based programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  16. Herrera, C., Grossman, J., Kauh, T., Feldman, A., McMaken, J., & Jucovy, L. (2007). Making a difference in schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  17. Holmbeck, G., Li, S., Schurman, J., Friedman, D., & Coakley, R. (2002). Collecting and managing multisource and multimethod data in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 5–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal component analysis. Aberdeen: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Karcher, M., Nakkula, M., & Harris, J. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: Correspondence between mentors' and mentees' assessments of relationship quality. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 93–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Keller, T. (2005). A systemic model of the youth mentoring intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 169–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. McAlinden, C., Khadka, J., & Pesudovs, K. (2011). Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and opthalmology. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 31, 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2010). M-plus statistical analysis with latent variables user's guide (6 ed.). Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Nakkula, M., & Harris, J. (2005). Assessment of mentoring relationships. In D. Dubois & M. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 100–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parra, G., DuBois, D., Neville, H., Pugh-Lilly, A., & Povinelli, N. (2002). Mentoring relationships for youth: Investigation of a process-oriented model. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Public/Private Ventures. (2002). Measuring the quality of mentor-youth relationships: A tool for mentoring programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  27. Rhodes, J. (2005). A model of youth mentoring. In D. Dubois & J. Baldwin (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 30–43). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhodes, J., Reddy, R., Roffman, J., & Grossman, J. (2005). Promoting successful youth mentoring relationships: A preliminary screening questionnaire. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 147–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sale, E., Bellamy, N., Springer, F., & Wang, M. (2008). Quality of provider–participant relationships and enhancement of adolescent social skills. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 263–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheffe, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booth, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zand, D., Thompson, N., Cervantes, R., Espiritu, R., Klagholz, D., LaBlanc, L., & Taylor, A. (2009). The mentor–youth alliance: the role of mentoring relationships in promoting youth competence. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annalise Ferro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samantha Wells
    • 2
  • Kathy Nixon Speechley
    • 3
  • Ellen Lipman
    • 4
  • David DeWit
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Social and Epidemiological Research DepartmentLondonCanada
  2. 2.Western University and Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonCanada
  3. 3.Western UniversityLondonCanada
  4. 4.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations