Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 56–64 | Cite as

Peer Attitudes Effects on Adolescent Substance Use: The Moderating Role of Race and Gender

  • Michael J. Mason
  • Jeremy Mennis
  • Julie Linker
  • Cristina Bares
  • Nikola Zaharakis


We examined the relationship between adolescents’ perceptions of their close friends’ attitudes about substance use, and their own use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Using data from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a multistage area probability sample sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (n = 17,865), we tested the direct and moderating effects of subgroups of race and gender on perceptions of adolescents’ close friends on past month substance use. Significant effects were found on peer attitudes influencing substance use for all race and gender subgroups. Close friends’ attitudes of indifference were associated with increased substance use and disapproval associated with reduced use, controlling for age, income, family structure, and adolescents’ own attitudes of risk of substance use. Significant moderating effects of peer attitudes on cigarette and marijuana use were found for both gender and race moderators. Conditional effects of the moderation by race were also examined for gender subgroups. The moderating effect of race on close friends’ attitudes impacting cigarette and marijuana use was stronger in magnitude and significance for females compared to males. Female marijuana and cigarette use was more influenced by close friends’ attitudes than males, and whites were more influenced by their close friends than Hispanics and blacks. White females are more susceptible to close friends’ attitudes on cigarette use as compared to white males and youth of other races. Implications for socially oriented preventive interventions are discussed.


Adolescent substance use Peer attitudes Race and gender 

Supplementary material

11121_2012_353_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Appendix 1Logistic regression results of moderation by gender of peer attitudes variable on cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use (n = 17,865). Confidence intervals (95 %) are reported in parentheses (DOCX 14 kb)
11121_2012_353_MOESM2_ESM.docx (54 kb)
Appendix 2Logistic regression results of moderation by race of peer attitudes variable on cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use (n = 17,865). Confidence intervals (95 %) are reported in parentheses (DOCX 54 kb)
11121_2012_353_MOESM3_ESM.docx (55 kb)
Appendix 3Logistic regression results of moderation by race and gender of peer attitudes variable on cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use (n = 17,865). Confidence intervals (95 %) are reported in parentheses (DOCX 55 kb)


  1. Allen, M., Donohue, W. A., Griffin, A., Ryan, D., & Mitchell Turner, M. M. (2003). Comparing the influence of parents and peers on the choice to use drugs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biglan, A., Brennan, P. A., Foster, S. L., Holder, H. D., Miller, T. L., Cunningham, P. B., & Zucker, R. A. (2004). Helping adolescents at risk: Prevention of multiple problems of youth. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., & Botvin, E. M. (1995). Effectiveness of cultural focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance–United States, 2011. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 1–162. Retrieved from
  7. Choi, Y., He, M., Herrenkohl, T. I., Catalano, R. F., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2012). Multiple identification and risks: Examination of peer factors across multiracial and single-race youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 847–862.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719–742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dauber, S. E., Paulson, J. F., & Leiferman, J. A. (2011). Race-specific transition patterns among alcohol use classes in adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 407–420.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, J. A., Bang, H., & Botvin, G. J. (2007). Which psychosocial moderate or directly affect substance use among inner-city adolescents? Addictive Behaviors, 32, 700–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fite, P. J., Wynn, P., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2009). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage and perceived disapproval on early substance use initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 769–771.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flay, B. R., Graumlich, S., Segawa, S., Burns, J. L., Holliday, M. Y., & AbanAya Investigators. (2004). Effects of two prevention programs on high-risk behaviors among African-American youth: A randomized trial. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 158, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & DeMaris, A. (1993). The family and peer relations of Black adolescents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, E., & Huang, B. (2002). Socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms and adolescent substance abuse. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberg, M. T. (2004). Current and future challenges in school-based prevention: The researcher perspective. Prevention Science, 5, 5–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartup, W. W. (2009). Critical issues and theoretical viewpoints. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 3–19). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press (in press).Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hemovich, V., Lac, A., & Crano, W. D. (2011). Understanding early-onset drug and alcohol outcomes among youth: The role of family structure, social factors, and interpersonal perceptions of use. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 16, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iannotti, R. J., & Bush, P. J. (1992). Perceived vs. actual friends use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana and cocaine: Which has the most influences? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 375–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2011. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  26. Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 289–315.Google Scholar
  27. Kashima, Y., Gelfand, M. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2012). A history of culture in psychology. In W. Stroebe (Ed.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 499–520). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kellam, S. G., & Langevin, D. J. (2003). A framework for understanding “evidence” in prevention research and programs. Prevention Science, 4, 137–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Effects of school-level norms on student substance use. Prevention Science, 3, 105–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning, W., & Lamb, K. (2003). Adolescent well-being in cohabiting, married, and single-parent families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mason, M., Mennis, J., Lawrence, F., Coatsworth, J. D., Valente, T., & Pate, P. (2009). The relationship of place to substance use and perceptions of risk and safety in urban adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 485–492.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mason, M., Valente, T., Coatsworth, J. D., Mennis, J., Lawrence, F., & Zelenak, P. (2010). Place-based social network quality and correlates of substance use among urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 419–427.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pearson, M., Steglich, C., & Snijders, T. (2006). Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections, 27, 47–63.Google Scholar
  34. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 national survey on drug use and health: Summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11–4658.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, R. D., Casten, R., & Flickinger, S. M. (1993). Influence of kinship social support on the parenting experiences and psychosocial adjustment of African-American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 29, 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834–844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Valente, T., Unger, J., & Johnson, A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Winters, K. C., Fawkes, T., Fahnhorst, T., Botzet, A., & August, G. (2007). A synthesis review of exemplary drug abuse prevention programs in the United States. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 371–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Mason
    • 1
  • Jeremy Mennis
    • 2
  • Julie Linker
    • 3
  • Cristina Bares
    • 3
  • Nikola Zaharakis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Commonwealth Institute for Child & Family StudiesVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations