Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Commentary on Subgroup Analysis in Intervention Research: Opportunities for the Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public health approach to prevention places a unique emphasis on understanding which populations are at greatest risk for poor health; the factors that place different populations at risk for experiencing injury, death, disability, and related health outcomes; the preventive interventions that are most effective for universal, selected, and indicated populations; and the best methods for encouraging the translation, dissemination, and adoption of preventive interventions for various populations. This information can be valuable in maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of public health prevention approaches. The present article provides a commentary on the contributions of rigorous subgroup analysis to intervention research and, in particular, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) public health approach to violence prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almirall, D., McCaffrey, D. F., Ramchand, R., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). Subgroups analysis when treatment and moderators are time-varying. Prevention Science.

  • Bloom, H.S., & Michalopoulos, C. (2012). When is the story in the subgroups? Prevention Science.

  • Borenstein, M., & Higgins, J.P.T. (2012). Meta-analysis and subgroups. Prevention Science.

  • Brown, C.H., Sloboda, Z., Faggiano, F., Teasdale, B., Keller, F., Burkhart, G., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Howe, G., Masyn, K., Wang, W., Muthen, B., Stephens, M., Grey, S., Perrino, T., & the Prevention Science and Methodology Group. (2012). Methods for synthesizing findings on moderation effects across multiple randomized trials. Prevention Science.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Therapeutic foster care for the prevention of violence: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). The effectiveness of universal school-based programs for the prevention of violent and aggressive behavior: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A.D., Henry, D.B., & Bettencourt, A. (2012). Methodological challenges examining subgroup differences: Examples from universal school-based youth violence prevention trials. Prevention Science.

  • Green, J., Howes, F., Waters, E., Maher, E., & Oberklaid, F. (2005). Promoting the social and emotional health of primary school-aged children: Reviewing the evidence base for school-based interventions. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 7, 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, S.T., & Rhoades, B.L. (2012). Latent class analysis: An alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevention Science.

  • Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multisite Violence Prevention Project. (2008). The Multisite Violence Prevention Project: Impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on social-cognitive outcomes. Prevention Science, 9, 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2009). CDC Injury Research Agenda, 2009–2018. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc.

  • Wang, R., & Ware, J. H. (2012). Detecting moderator effects using subgroup analyses. Prevention Science.

  • Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, S130–S143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greta M. Massetti.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haegerich, T.M., Massetti, G.M. Commentary on Subgroup Analysis in Intervention Research: Opportunities for the Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention. Prev Sci 14, 193–198 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0331-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0331-0

Keywords

Navigation