Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 364–376 | Cite as

Three Year Follow-Up of Coping Power Intervention Effects: Evidence of Neighborhood Moderation?

  • John E. Lochman
  • Karen C. Wells
  • Lixin Qu
  • Lei Chen
Article

Abstract

The Coping Power program is an indicated prevention program for at-risk aggressive preadolescent children, and has had demonstrated short-term effects on antisocial outcomes. This study provided a longer-term 3-year follow-up for a sample of 245 fourth grade children who had been randomly assigned to Coping Power or to a care-as-usual Comparison condition. Intervention took place during the fifth and sixth grade years, at the time of transition to middle school. Growth curve analyses indicate that Coping Power had linear effects through the 3 years after the end of intervention on reductions in children’s aggressive behavior and academic behavior problems, children’s expectations that aggression would lead to positive outcomes, and parents’ lack of supportiveness with their children. Participants’ homes were geocoded into census tracts, and neighborhood qualities which may have moderated outcomes involved neighborhood disadvantage based on census tract information, and parent-reported social organization of neighborhoods. There was limited support for the hypothesis that intervention effects would be greater in less problematic neighborhoods. Intervention produced the greatest improvement in parental supportiveness for families living in communities with less neighborhood disadvantage, but there were no similar effects for the behavioral and social cognitive outcomes, or in analyses using neighborhood social organization as a moderator. Counter the hypothesis, intervention produced the greatest reduction in children’s aggression in neighborhoods characterized by poor social organization.

Keywords

Targeted prevention Neighborhood effects Aggressive behavior Long-term followup 

References

  1. Aitken, M., Anderson, D., & Hinde, J. (1981). Statistical modeling of data on teaching styles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 144, 419–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, T. D., Lochman, J. E., Fite, P. J., Wells, K. C., & Colder, C. R. (in press). The influence of neighborhood characteristics and parenting practices on academic problems and aggression outcomes among moderately to highly aggressive children. Journal of Community Psychology.Google Scholar
  3. Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: Empirical findings and future directions. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, M. H., & Lipman, E. L. (2002). Do places matter? Socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioral problems of children in Canada. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 378–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, C. P., Zmuda, J. H., Kellam, S. G., & Ialongo, N. S. (2009). Longitudinal impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 926–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody, G. H., Ge, X., Kim, S. Y., Murry, V. M., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Conger, R. D. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage moderates association of parenting and older sibling problem attitudes and behavior with conduct disorders in African American children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luescher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (Eds.). (1997). Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 1. Context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002). Predictor variables associated with positive Fast Track outcomes at the end of third grade. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2010a). Fast Track intervention effects on youth arrests and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conduct Problem Prevention Research Group. (2010b). The effects of a multi-year universal social-emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2011). Effects of the Fast Track preventive intervention on the development of conduct disorder across childhood. Child Development, 82, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Fetrow, R. A. (2003). Outcomes during middle school for an elementary school-based preventive intervention for conduct problems: Follow-up results from a standardized trial. Behavior Therapy, 34, 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fite, P. J., Wynn, P., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2009a). The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on proactive and reactive aggression. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 542–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fite, P. J., Wynn, P., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2009b). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage and perceived disapproval on early substance use initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 769–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorman-Smith, D., & Tolan, P. (1998). The role of exposure to community violence and developmental problems among inner-city youth. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 101–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorman-Smith, D., Tolan, P., & Henry, D. (2005). Promoting resilience in the inner city: Families as venues for protection, support, and opportunity. In R. DeV. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in children, families, and communities: Linking context to practice and policy (pp. 137–155). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, M. T., & Kusche, C. A. (2006). Building social and emotional competence: The PATHS curriculum. In S. R. Jimerson & M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 395–412). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Gresham, F. M., & Lochman, J. E. (2009). Methodological issues in research using cognitive-behavioral interventions. In M. J. Mayer, R. Van Acker, J. E. Lochman, & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral interventions for emotional and behavioral disorders: School-based practice (pp. 58–81). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  21. Guerra, N. G., Huesmann, L. R., & Spindler, A. (2003). Community violence exposure, social cognition, and aggression among urban elementary school children. Child Development, 74, 1561–1576.Google Scholar
  22. Gutman, L. M., McLoyd, V. C., & Tokoyawa, T. (2005). Financial strain, neighborhood stress, parenting behaviors and adolescent adjustment in urban African-American families. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R. D., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingoldsby, E. M., & Shaw, D. S. (2002). Neighborhood contextual factors and early-starting antisocial pathways. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 21–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins, J. (2008). Psychosocial adversity and resilience. In M. Rutter, D. V. M. Bishop, D. S. Pine, S. Scott, J. Stevenson, E. Taylor, & A. Thapar (Eds.), Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (5th ed., pp. 377–391). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Siegel, T., & Thomas, C. (1989). Cognitive-behavioral therapy and relationship therapy in the treatment of children referred for antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 522–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kupersmidt, J. B., Griesler, P. C., DeRosier, M. E., Patterson, C. J., & Davis, P. W. (1995). Childhood aggression and peer relations in the context of family and neighborhood factors. Child Development, 66, 360–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lochman, J. E. (1992). Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys: Three year follow-up and preventive effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 426–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lochman, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). Social-cognitive processes of severely violent, moderately aggressive and nonaggressive boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 366–374.Google Scholar
  30. Lochman, J. E. (2004). Contextual factors in risk and prevention research. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 50, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lochman, J. E., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1995). Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 549–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002a). Contextual social-cognitive mediators and child outcome: A test of the theoretical model in the Coping Power Program. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 971–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002b). The Coping Power Program at the middle school transition: Universal and indicated prevention effects. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, S40–S54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2003). Effectiveness study of Coping Power and classroom intervention with aggressive children: Outcomes at a one-year follow-up. Behavior Therapy, 34, 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). The Coping Power program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: Outcome effects at the one-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 571–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C., Powell, N., Roth, D. L., & Windle, M. (2006). Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods addressing low doseage of intervention. New Directions for Evaluation, 110, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lochman, J. E., Wells, K. C., & Murray, M. (2007). The Coping Power program: Preventive intervention at the middle school transition. In P. Tolan, J. Szapocznik, & S. Sambrano (Eds.), Preventing youth substance abuse: Science-based programs for children and adolescents (pp. 185–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lochman, J.E., Wells, K.C., & Lenhart, L.A. (2008). Coping Power child group program: Facilitator guide. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C., Powell, N., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2009). Dissemination of the Coping Power program: Importance of intensity of counselor training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 476–497.Google Scholar
  40. Markowitz, F. (2003). Socioeconomic disadvantage and violence: Recent research on culture and neighborhood control as explanatory mechanisms. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthys, W., & Lochman, J. E. (2010). Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in childhood. Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olds, D. L., Sadler, L., & Kitzner, H. (2007). Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: Recent evidence from randomized trials. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 355–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. F. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5, 199–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2000). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.Google Scholar
  47. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Schwab-Stone, M. E., Ayers, T. S., Kasprow, W., Voyce, C., Barone, C., Shriver, T., & Weissberg, R. P. (1995). No safe haven: A study of violence exposure in an urban community. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1343–1352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Serketich, W. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1996). The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 27, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Supplee, L., Gardner, F., & Arnds, K. (2006). Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the Family Check-Up in early childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tolan, P. H., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D. (2001). Chicago Youth Development Study Community and Neighborhood Measure: Construction and Reliability Technical Report. Chicago: Families and Communities Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  52. Tolan, P. H., Gorman-Smith, D., Huesmann, L. R., & Zelli, A. (1997). Assessment of family relation characteristics: A measure to explain risks for antisocial behavior and depression in youth. Psychological Assessment, 9, 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tolan, P. H., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D. B. (2004). Supporting families in high risk settings: Proximal effects of the SAFE children prevention program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 855–869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vanfossen, B., Brown, C. H., Kellam, S., Sokoloff, N., & Doering, S. (2010). Neighborhood context and the development of aggression in boys and girls. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 329–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wells, K. C., Lochman, J. E., & Lenhart, L. A. (2008). Coping Power parent group program: Facilitator guide. New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
  56. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S. G., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Effects of first grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 585–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zonnevylle-Bender, M. J. S., Matthys, W., van de Wiel, N. M. H., & Lochman, J. (2007). Preventive effects of treatment of DBD in middle childhood on substance use and delinquent behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 33–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Lochman
    • 1
  • Karen C. Wells
    • 2
  • Lixin Qu
    • 1
  • Lei Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Duke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations