Effects of a Narrative HPV Vaccination Intervention Aimed at Reaching College Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This longitudinal study reports on the development and evaluation of a narrative intervention aimed at increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among college women. The prevention of HPV is a public health priority due to its pervasiveness and relationship to cervical cancer, the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women worldwide. Pilot work utilizing culture-centric narrative theory guided development of the intervention content. Exemplification theory led to hypotheses comparing communication sources of the narrative messages (peer only, medical expert only, or a combination of the two source types) in a four-arm randomized controlled trial (N = 404; 18–26 year olds). The combined peer-expert narrative intervention nearly doubled vaccination compared to controls (22% vs. 12%). The pragmatic goal of increasing HPV vaccination and the theoretical predictions about message source were supported. As predicted, the inclusion of peer and medical expert sources plays a critical role in promoting HPV vaccination among college women. Furthermore, the intervention increased HPV vaccination by increasing vaccine self-efficacy and intent. Theoretical and practical implications for designing effective HPV vaccine messages are discussed.
KeywordsHPV vaccination Culture-centric narrative communication theory Communication source College women
This research was supported by a Cooperative Agreement Number R36 CD0000704 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. The author gratefully acknowledges Michael Hecht for his review of the manuscript and mentorship throughout the design and implementation of the overall project as a dissertation, Michelle Miller-Day, Greg Zimet, Heather Brandt, and Allison Friedman for their feedback in developing the HPV vaccine messages, Peg Spear and Linda LaSalle for their support of the project and collaboration with UHS, and all the women who participated in the study.
- Bandura, A. (2002b). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121–153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Carmine, E. G. & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.). Social measurement: Current issues, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- CDC. (2009). United States cancer statistics: 1999–2005 incidence and mortality web-based report, from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/race.htm.
- CDC. (2010). Recommended adult immunization schedule: United States, 2010 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (Vol. 60).Google Scholar
- Fan, D. P. (2002). Impact of persuasive information on secular trends in health-related behavior. In R. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication (pp. 251–264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosphy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Hecht, M. L., & Miller-Day, M. (2009). Drug resistance strategies project: Using narrative theory to enhance adolescents’ communication competence. In K. Cissna & L. Frey (Eds.), Handbook of applied communication: Exemplary programs. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indices in covariate structure analysis: Conventional analysis versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
- Jain, N., Euler, G. L., Shefer, A., Lu, P., Yankey, D., & Markowitz, L. (2009). Human papillomavirus (HPV) awareness and vaccination initiation among women in the United States, National Immunization Survey-Adult 2007. Preventive Medicine, 48, 426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.11.010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kahn, J. A., Rosenthal, S. L., Jin, Y., Huang, B., Namakydoust, A., & Zimet, G. (2008). Rates of human papillomavirus vaccination, attitudes about vaccination, and human papillomavirus prevalence in young women. Obsetrics & Gynecology, 111, 1103–1110. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817051fa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kreuter, M. W., Holmes, K., Alcaraz, K., Kalesan, B., Rath, S., Richert, M., et al. (2010). Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African-American women. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, S6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Licht, A. S., Murphy, J. M., Hyland, A. J., Fix, B. V., Hawk, L. W., & Mahoney, M. C. (2010). Is use of the human papillomavirus vaccine among female college students related to human papillimavirus knowlegde and risk perceptions? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 86, 74–78. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.037705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz, L. E., Dunne, E. F., Saraiya, M., Lawson, H. W., Chesson, H., & Unger, E. R. (2007). Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 56 (pp. 1–24). Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control (CDC) Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS): MMWR Recommendation Report.Google Scholar
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.Google Scholar
- Poland, G. A., Jacobson, R. M., & Ovsyannikova, I. G. (2009). Trends affecting the future of vaccine development and delivery: The role of demographics, regulatory science, the anti-vaccine movement, and vaccinomics. Vaccine, 27, 3240–3244. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rees, N. (2010). HHS says doctors and minorities mistrust vaccines. VaccineNewsDaily.com, from http://vaccinenewsdaily.com/news/212825-hhs-says-doctors-and-minorities-mistrust-vaccines.
- Sales, M. J., Milhausen, R. R., Wingwood, G. M., DiClimente, R. J., Salazar, L. F., & Crosby, R. A. (2008). Validation of a parent-adolescent communication scale for use in STD/HIV prevention interventions. Health Education & Behavior, 35, 332–345. doi: 10.1177/1090198106293524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snyder, L., & Hamilton, M. A. (2002). A meta-analysis of U.S. health campaign effects on behavior: Emphasize enforcement, exposure, and new information and beware the secular trend. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 357–382). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H. B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar