Skip to main content
Log in

The Prevalence of Evidence-based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2008

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act mandates the implementation of evidence-based drug prevention curricula in the nation’s schools. The purpose of this paper is to estimate changes in the prevalence of such curricula from 2005 to 2008. We surveyed school staff in a nationally representative sample of schools with middle school grades. Using a web-based approach to data collection that we supplemented by telephone calls, we secured data from 1892 schools for a response rate of 78.2%. We estimate that the prevalence of evidence-based drug prevention curricula rose from 42.6% in 2005 to 46.9% in 2008, and that the prevalence of schools that used these curricula most frequently increased from 22.7% to 25.9% over this period. In addition, the proportion of schools using locally developed curricula also rose, from 17.6% to 28.1%. This study suggests the success of efforts by the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools to increase the prevalence of evidence-based curricula, as well as the need to continue to track the prevalence of these curricula in response to any reductions in the Office’s fiscal support for evidence-based drug prevention curricula in the nation’s schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. (2006). Blueprints for violence prevention overview, 2007, from University of Colorado, Boulder (CO) Web site http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/

  • Gandhi, A. G., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., Chrismer, S. S., & Weiss, C. H. (2007). The devil is in the details: Examining the evidence for “proven” school-based drug abuse prevention programs. Evaluation Review, 31, 43–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, D. M., & Huber, J. C., Jr. (2009). The social construction of ‘evidence-based’ drug prevention programs: A reanalysis of data from the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. Evaluation Review, 33, 396–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2009). Monitoring the Future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2008. (NIH Publication No. 09-7401). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  • Krigman, E. (2010). Duncan: NCLB on Congress’ agenda this year. Retrieved January 27, 2010, from NationalJournal.com http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/no_20100122_1573.php

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data, 2002-03. [Data file]. Retrieved February 21, 2007, from Common Core of Data Web site, http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data, 2005–06. [Data file]. Retrieved February 21, 2007, from Common Core of Data Web site, http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp

  • National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP). (2009). SAMHSA model programs. Retrieved December 30, 2009, from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat 1425, Sec 4115.a.1.c. (2002).

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). (2008). National drug control strategy - FY 2009 budget summary. Retrieved December 30, 2009, from http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/09budget/fy09budget.pdf

  • Petrosino, A., & Soydan, H. (2005). The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quality Education Data Inc. (1998). QED national education database: Data users guide, (Version 4.6). Denver, CO.

  • Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science, 3, 257–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringwalt, C. L., Clark, H. K., Hanley, S., Shamblen, S. R., & Flewelling, R. L. (2009a). Project ALERT: A cluster randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 625–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringwalt, C. L., Vincus, A., Hanley, S., Ennett, S., Bowling, J., & Rohrbach, L. (2009b). The prevalence of evidence-based drug use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools in 2005. Prevention Science, 10, 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringwalt, C. L., Clark, H. K., Hanley, S., Shamblen, S. R., & Flewelling, R. L. (2010). The effects of Project ALERT one year past curriculum completion. Prevention Science, 11, 172–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-Free Schools Expert Panel. (2001). Exemplary programs. Retrieved 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/exemplary01/sddsguid.pdf and http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/ORAD/KAD/expert_panel/2001exemplary_sddfs.html

  • St. Pierre, T. L., Osgood, D. W., Mincemoyer, C. C., Kaltreider, D. L., & Kauh, T. J. (2005). Results of an independent evaluation of Project ALERT delivered in schools by Cooperative Extension. Prevention Science, 6, 305–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program: Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Federal Register, 63, 29902–29906.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Fiscal year 2010 budget summary - May 7, 2009: Section IV. Programs proposed for elimination. Retrieved December 30, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget10/summary/edlite-section4.html

  • Weiss, C. H. (2008). The fairy godmother–and her warts: Making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy A. Vincus.

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA016669). We continue to be quite thankful to MSI for their expert handling of our data collection efforts. We are grateful to the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools for their letter of support for our data collection efforts. We also are grateful to Sharon Fowler for her unparalleled bibliographic help.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringwalt, C., Vincus, A.A., Hanley, S. et al. The Prevalence of Evidence-based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2008. Prev Sci 12, 63–69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0184-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0184-3

Keywords

Navigation