A Biosocial-Affect Model of Adolescent Sensation Seeking: The Role of Affect Evaluation and Peer-Group Influence in Adolescent Drug Use

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of heightened experimentation with risky behavior. Models of brain development suggest that this phenomenon is partly the result of increased adolescent sensation seeking unaccompanied by maturation in ability to evaluate risks. We test an alternative biosocial-affect model in which favorable affect attached to behavior leads to discounting of risks. Although the model applies to both adolescents and adults, it predicts that the surge in sensation seeking during adolescence increases affective attraction to risky behavior, reduces perceived risk of the behavior, and results in peer-group reinforcement of these effects. We estimated models that included these influences for three drugs (tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana) in a national sample of youth ages 14 to 22. Consistent with brain maturation models, sensation seeking rose during the age period under study with girls peaking earlier than boys. Nevertheless, independent of age or gender, the biosocial-affect model explained the relation between sensation seeking and drug use. The findings indicate that although adolescents recognize the risks of drug use, they are subject to both biological and social influences that encourage risk taking. Implications for the prevention of risky adolescent behavior are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    We did not explicitly test the measurement models for the affect heuristic and peer attraction factors. However, the high loadings of the variables that defined these factors, and the satisfactory goodness of fit indices for the entire models (shown in the Results) support the adequacy of the measurement assumptions for these factors.

  2. 2.

    Our interest in separating the effects of sensation seeking on drug use into affect evaluation and, peer attraction was to compare the relative sizes of these mediational paths, not to define confidence intervals for them. Hence, we do not conduct additional tests of significance for these components.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Audrain-Mcgovern, J., Rodriguez, D., & Moss, H. B. (2003). Smoking progression and physical activity. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention , 12, 1121–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1990). Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among young adults: Further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 31, 173–184.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1998). Explaining recent increases in students’ marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 through 1996. American Journal of Public Health , 88(6), 887–892.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura, A. (1986). The social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS 6 Structural equation manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chambers, R. A., Taylor, J. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry , 160(6), 1041–1052.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dackis, C., & O’Brien, C. (2005). Neurobiology of addiction: Treatment and public policy ramifications. Nature Neuroscience , 8(11), 1431–1436.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Donohew, R. L., Hoyle, R., Clayton, R., Skinner, W., Colon, S., & Rice, R. (1999). Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: Models for marijuana and alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol , 60(5), 622–631.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A. S., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 13, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbein M. (1997). Predicting, understanding, and changing socially relevant behaviors: Lessons learnt. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 177–191). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fishbein, M. (2003). Toward an understanding of the role of perceived risk in HIV prevention research. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 49–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuster, J. M. (2002). Frontal lobe and cognitive development. Journal of Neurocytology , 31, 373–385.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giedd, J. N. (2004). Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Science , 1021, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience , 2(10), 861–863.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gullone, E., Moore, S., Moss, S., & Boyd, C. (2000). The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Research , 15(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hornik R., Maklan, D., Cadell, D., Barmada, C. B., Jacobsohn, L. & Prado, A. (2002). Evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign: Fifth semi-annual report of findings. Rockville, MD: Westat.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoyle, R. H., Stephenson, M. T., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., & Donohew, L. (2002). Reliability and validity of a brief measure of sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences , 32, 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jamieson, P. E., & Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). Do films about mentally disturbed characters promote ineffective coping in vulnerable youth? Journal of Adolescence, 29, 749–760.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnston, L. (2003). Alcohol and illicit drugs: The role of risk perceptions. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 56–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnston, L. O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2004). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2003. Vol. I: Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 04-5507). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  25. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Krawczyk, D. (2002). Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 26, 631–664.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin , 127, 267–286.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Millstein, S. G., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2002). Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. Journal of Adolescent Health , 31S, 10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review , 100, 674–701.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson, C. A., Bloom, F. E., Cameron, J. L., Amaral, D., & Pine, D. (2002). An integrative, multidisciplinary approach to the study of brain-behavior relations in the context of typical and atypical development. Development and Psychopathology , 14, 499–520.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pate, R. R., Heath, G. W., Dowda, M., & Trost, S. G. (1996). Associations between physical activity and other health behaviors in a representative sample of US adolescents. American Journal of Public Health , 86(11), 1577–1581.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Quadrel, M. J., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist , 48(2), 102–116.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rather, B. C., & Goldman, M. S. (1994). Drinking-related differences in the memory organization of alcohol expectancies. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology , 2, 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality , 38, 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodgers, J. L. (2003). EMOSA sexuality models, memes, and the tipping point: Policy and program implications. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 185–192). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rolison, M. R., & Scherman, A. (2002). Factors influencing adolescents’ decisions to engage in risk-taking behavior. Adolescence , 37, 585–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Romer, D. (2003). Prospects for an integrated approach to adolescent risk reduction. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Romer, D., & Jamieson, P. (2001). The role of perceived risk in starting and stopping smoking. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy (pp. 64–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Romer, D., & Stanton, B. (2003). Feelings about risk and the epidemic diffusion of adolescent sexual behavior. Prevention Science , 4(1), 39–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sallis, J. F., Prochaska, J. J., & Taylor, W. C. (2000). A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 32(5), 963–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shafer, J., & Brown, S. A. (1991). Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 59, 558–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Short, L., & Hennessy, M. (2004). Using structural equations to estimate the effects of behavioral interventions. Structural Equation Modeling , 1, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Slovic, P. (2001). Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools? In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, and policy (pp. 97–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, A. M. A., & Rosenthal, D. (1995). Adolescents’ perceptions of their risk environment. Journal of Adolescence , 18, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Tessner, K. D., & Toga, A. W. (2001). Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. The Journal of Neuroscience , 2(22), 8819–8829.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spear, L. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 24, 417–463.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H., Palmgreen, P., & Slater, M. D. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence , 72, 279–286.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sutoo, D. E., & Akiyama, K. (1996). The mechanism by which exercise modifies brain function. Physiology and Behavior , 60, 177–181.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wallace, J. M., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Cooper, S. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2003). Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th and 12th grade students, 1976–2000. Addiction , 98, 225–234.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yanovitzky, I. (2005). Sensation seeking and adolescent drug use: The mediating role of association with deviant peers and pro-drug discussions. Health Communication , 17(1), 67–89.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yanovitzky, I. (2006). Sensation seeking and alcohol use by college students: Examining multiple pathways of effects. Journal of Health Communication , 11, 269–280.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based statistics in structural equation modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 51, 289–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

  58. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist , 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 10(6), 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zuckerman M., Eysenck S., & Eysenck H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural age and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 46, 139–149.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality , 68, 999–1029.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Romer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romer, D., Hennessy, M. A Biosocial-Affect Model of Adolescent Sensation Seeking: The Role of Affect Evaluation and Peer-Group Influence in Adolescent Drug Use. Prev Sci 8, 89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0064-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Drug use
  • Sensation seeking
  • Affect heuristic