Abstract
This study used mediation analyses, implemented in a longitudinal structural equation modeling framework, to examine the mechanisms by which a social-influence-based school drug use prevention program (Project ALERT) achieved its effects on past month cigarette use and alcohol misuse. Participants were 4,277 South Dakotan middle-school students (2,554 treatment and 1,723 control) measured at baseline and 1 year later on past month cigarette use and alcohol misuse, as well as cigarette- and alcohol-related mediating variables targeted by the Project ALERT curriculum (i.e., resistance self-efficacy, positive and negative beliefs about use, and peer influence). Results for cigarettes showed that all hypothesized mediating variables were significant mediators of ALERT’s effect on intentions to smoke and past month cigarette use, with peer influence being the strongest. Results for alcohol point to positive beliefs about the consequences of drinking as an important mediator for alcohol misuse. Taken together, the findings highlight an avenue for program improvement through increased impact on peer influence to use alcohol and drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1985). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
R. M., Baron, & D. A., Kenny (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
M. H., Becker (1974). The Health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 324–473.
P. M., Bentler (1988). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
G. J., Botvin, Dusenbury, L., Baker, E., James-Ortiz, S., E. M., Botvin, & Kerner, J. (1992). Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychology, 11, 290–299.
G. J., Botvin, Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., E. M., Botvin, & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(14), 1106–1112.
A. S., Bryk, & S. W., Raudenbush (1992). Hierarchical linearmodels: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park,California: Sage Publications.
Cuijpers, P. (2002). Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Journal of Addictive Disorders, 27, 1009–1023.
S. I., Donaldson, J. W., Graham, & W. B., Hansen (1994). Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), 195–216.
S. I., Donaldson, J. W., Graham, A. M., Piccinin, & W. B., Hansen (1995). Resistance-skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private Catholic schools. Health Psychology, 14(4), 291–300.
P. L., Ellickson, & R. M., Bell (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247(4948), 1299–1305.
P. L., Ellickson, R. M., Bell, M. A., Thomas, A. E., Robyn, & G. L., Zellman (1988). Designing and implementing projectALERT. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
P. L., Ellickson, R. M., Bell, & McGuigan, K. (1993). Preventingadolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program. American Journal of Public Health, 83(6), 856–861.
P. L., Ellickson, D. F., McCaffrey, Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventingadolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of project ALERTin middle schools. American Journal of Public Health,93(11), 1830–1836.
L. T., Hu, & P. M., Bentler (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
K. A., Komro, C. L., Perry, C. L., Williams, M. H., Stigler, Farbakhsh, K., & Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2001). How did Project Northland reduce alcohol use among young adolescents? Analysis of mediating variables. Health Education Research, 16(1), 59–70.
D. P., MacKinnon, & J. H., Dwyer (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 144–158.
D. P., MacKinnon, M. D., Weber, & M. A., Pentz (1989). How do school-based drug prevention programs work and for whom? Drugs and Society, 3, 125–143.
D. P., MacKinnon, C. A., Johnson, M. A., Pentz, J. H., Dwyer, W. B., Hansen, B. R., Flay, & E. Y., Wang (1991). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: First-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychology, 10(3), 164–172.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus usersguide: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers(Version 2.14). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Rosenstock, I., Strecher, V., & Becker, M. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175–183.
D. B., Rubin (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of American Statistical Association, 91, 473–489.
J. L., Schafer (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
J. L., Schafer (1999). NORM (2.02). Available from http://www.stat.psu.edu/∼jls/misoftwa.html#win.
G. W., Snedecor, & W. G., Cochran (1989). Statistical methods(8th ed.). Ames Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
M. E., Sobel (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhard (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–293). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
M. E., Sobel (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1986 (pp. 159–186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
J. H., Steiger, & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically based testsfor the number of common factors. Paper presented at the AnnualMeeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.
N. S., Tobler, M. R., Roona, Ochshorn, P., D. G., Marshall, A. V., Streke, K. M., Stackpole (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.
S. R., Wynn, Schulenberg, J., D. D., Kloska, & V. B., Laetz (1997). The mediating influence of refusal skills in preventing adolescent alcohol misuse. Journal of School Health, 67(9), 390–395.
S. R., Wynn, Schulenberg, J., J. L., Maggs, & R. A., Zucker (2000). Preventing alcohol misuse: The impact of refusal skills and norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(1), 36–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orlando, M., Ellickson, P.L., McCaffrey, D.F. et al. Mediation Analysis of a School-Based Drug Prevention Program: Effects of Project ALERT. Prev Sci 6, 35–46 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-1251-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-1251-z