Abstract
We present a qualitative case study where we used four principles of ecological theory from community psychology as a template to assess the dynamics about how a preventive community intervention was transacted in eight communities in Victoria, Australia. The principles were cycling of resources, interdependence, adaptation, and succession. Ecological thinking focuses on key resources in communities. That is, the people, events, and settings that are the foundations of thinking about communities as systems. The data set consists of field diaries kept by and serial interviews with nine community development workers over a 2-year period. We found that the analysis highlighted a process-oriented way of representing the intervention, one that sees beyond the intervention's technical components (or packaged elements) to the complexities of the cultural and political change processes occurring beneath. The value of this is the attention focussed on likely project sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.REFERENCES
Bracht, N. (Ed.). (1990). Health promotion at a community level. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brown, S., & Lumley, J. (1998). Maternal health after childbirth: Results of an Australian population based survey. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 156–161.
Brown, S., Lumley, J., Small, R., & Astbury, J. (1994). Missing voices. The experience of motherhood. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fawcett, S. B., Francisco, V. T., Paine-Andrews, A., et al. (1995). Work group evaluation handbook: Evaluating and supporting community initiatives for health. Work Group on Health Promotion and Community Development, University of Kansas.
Flora, J. A., Lefebvre, R. C., Murray, D. M., Stone, E. J., Assaf, A., Mittlemark, M., & Finnegan, J. R. (1993). A community education monitoring system: Methods from the Stanford Five-City Project, the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program. Health Education Research, 8, 81–95.
Francisco, V., Paine, A., & Fawcett, S. (1993). A method for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Education Research, 8, 403–416.
Gifford, S. (1996). Qualitative research: The soft option? Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 6, 58–61.
Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M., & Rimer, B. K. (Eds.). (1990). Health education and health behaviour. Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Goodman, R. M., & Steckler, A. B. (1987). A model of institutionalisation of health promotion programs. Family and Community Health, 11, 63–78.
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1999). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach (3rd Ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Green, L. W., and Ottoson, J. M. (1999). Community and population health (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. American Psychological Association (4th Ed.).
Green, L. W., Poland, B., & Rootman, I. (2000). The settings approach to health promotion. In B. Poland, I. Rootman, & L. W. Green (Eds.), Settings for health promotion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gunn, J., Southern, D., Chondros, P., Thomson, P., & Robertson, K. (2003). Guidelines for assessing postnatal problems: Introducing evidence based guidelines in Australian general practice. Family Practice, 20(4), 382–389.
Hawe, P., Shiell, A., Riley, T., & Gold, L. (2004). Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 788–793.
House, E. R. (1981). Three perspectives on innovation. In R. Lehming & M. Kane (Eds.), Improving schools. Using what we know (pp. 17–41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kelly, J. G. (1966). Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 21, 535–539.
Kelly, J. G. (1967). Naturalistic observations and theory confirmation: An example. Human Development, 10, 212–222.
Kelly, J. G. (1979). “Tain't what you do, it's the way that you do it. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 239–261.
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon, & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organisational research (pp. 118–134). London: Sage.
King, N., Thomas, K., & Bell, D. (2003). An out of hours protocol for community palliative care: Practitioners' perspectives. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 9(7), 277–282.
Lumley, J., Small, R., Brown, S., Watson, L., Gunn, J., Mitchell, C., & Dawson, W. (2003). PRISM (Program of Resources, Information and Support for Mothers). Protocol for a community-randomised trial. BMC Public Health, 3, 36.
Minkler, M. (1990). Improving health through community organisation. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behaviour and health education. Theory, research and practice (pp. 257–287). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O'Donnell, C. R., Tharp, R. G., & Wilson, K. (1993). Activity settings as the unit of analysis: A theoretical basis for community intervention and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 501–520.
Orlandi, M. A., Landers, C., Weston, R., & Hayley, N. (1990). Diffusion of health promotion innovations. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behaviour and health education. Theory, research and practice (pp. 288–313). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Qualitative Research and Solutions. (1999). QSR NUD *IST Version 1.1.127.
Riley, T., & Hawe, P. (2005). Researching practice: The methodological case for narrative inquiry. Health Education Research. 20, 226–236.
Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings: A revision and extension of Roger C. Barker's Ecological Psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Shediac-Rizkallah, M., & Bone, L. (1998). Planning for the sustainability of community-based research programs: Conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, policy and practice. Health Education Research, 13(1), 87–108.
Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health action. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282–298.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory and procedures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Trickett, E. J. (1998). Toward a framework for defining and resolving ethical issues in the protection of communities involved in primary prevention projects. Ethics and Behavior, 8(4), 321–337.
Trickett, E. J., & Birman, D. (1989). Taking ecology seriously: A community development approach to individually based preventive interventions in schools. In L. A. Bond & B. E. Compas (Eds.), Primary prevention and promotion in schools (Vol XII, pp. 361–389). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Todd, D. M. (1972). The social environment of the high school: Guidelines for individual change and organizational redevelopment. In S. G. Golann & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.), Handbook of community mental health (pp. 331–406). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Trickett, E. J., Kelly, J. G., & Vincent, T. A. (1985). The spirit of ecological enquiry in community research. In E. C. Susskind & D. C. Klein (Eds.), Community research. Methods, paradigms and applications (pp. 283–333). New York: Preager.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our thanks to the CDOs: Wendy Arney, Deborah Brown, Kay Dufty, Serena Everill, Annie Lanyon, Melanie Sanders, Leanne Skipsey, Jennifer Stone, and Scilla Taylor for their willingness to engage with us and reflect on the experience of keeping diaries. It was a privilege to be let inside their practice worlds.The PRISM research trial team is Judith Lumley, Rhonda Small, Stephanie Brown, Lyn Watson, Jane Gunn, Wendy Dawson, and Creina Mitchell. Our thanks to them for the opportunity to participate as collaborators.We also wish to thank Ed Trickett whose work in ecological theory we drew on heavily for this paper, and for his comments on an earlier draft.The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. PH is a Senior Scholar of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hawe, P., Riley, T. Ecological Theory in Practice: Illustrations From a Community-Based Intervention to Promote the Health of Recent Mothers. Prev Sci 6, 227–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0008-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0008-z