Abstract
To prevent photooxidative damage under supraoptimal light, photosynthetic organisms evolved mechanisms to thermally dissipate excess absorbed energy, known as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Here we quantify NPQ-induced alterations in light-harvesting processes and photochemical reactions in Photosystem 2 (PS2) in the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Using a combination of picosecond lifetime analysis and variable fluorescence technique, we examined the dynamics of NPQ activation upon transition from dark to high light. Our analysis revealed that NPQ activation starts with a 2–3-fold increase in the rate constant of non-radiative charge recombination in the reaction center (RC); however, this increase is compensated with a proportional increase in the rate constant of back reactions. The resulting alterations in photochemical processes in PS2 RC do not contribute directly to quenching of antenna excitons by the RC, but favor non-radiative dissipation pathways within the RC, reducing the yields of spin conversion of the RC chlorophyll to the triplet state. The NPQ-induced changes in the RC are followed by a gradual ~ 2.5-fold increase in the yields of thermal dissipation in light-harvesting complexes. Our data suggest that thermal dissipation in light-harvesting complexes is the major sink for NPQ; RCs are not directly involved in the NPQ process, but could contribute to photoprotection via reduction in the probability of 3Chl formation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Pt1:
-
Diatom algae Phaeodactylum tricornutum (CCMP 632)
- Pt4:
-
Diatom algae Phaeodactylum tricornutum (UTEX 646)
- Dd:
-
Diadinoxanthin
- Dt:
-
Diatoxanthin
- DTT:
-
Dithiothreitol
- FIRe:
-
Fluorescence Induction and Relaxation
- PS1 (PS2):
-
Photosystem 1 (photosystem 2)
- RC:
-
Reaction center
- FCP:
-
Fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding Protein
- Lhcx:
-
Light-harvesting proteins that belong to LI818/Lhcsr protein family and act as modulators of NPQ (Goss and Lepetit 2015)
- XC:
-
Xanthophyll cycle
- F o :
-
Minimum yield of fluorescence at open PS2 RC in the dark-adapted cells
- F M :
-
Maximum yield of fluorescence at closed PS2 RC in the dark-adapted cells
- F V/F M :
-
Maximum PS2 photochemical efficiency in the dark [=(F M − F o)/F M]
- \( F_{\text{M}}^{\text{NPQ}} \) :
-
Maximum yield of fluorescence at closed PS2 RC in cells after exposure to prolonged illumination
- \( F_{\text{M}}^{\text{I}} \) :
-
Maximum yield of fluorescence at closed PS2 RC in photoinhibited cells (e.g., with damaged RCs)
- NPQ:
-
Non-photochemical quenching parameter [\( = (F_{M} - F_{\text{M}}^{\text{NPQ}} )/F_{\text{M}}^{\text{NPQ}} \)]
- σ PS2 :
-
Functional absorption cross section of PS2
- P680, P:
-
Primary donor of the PS2 RC
- I:
-
Intermediate acceptor of PS2 RC (phaeophytin)
- RP:
-
Radical pair
- 3Chl:
-
Triplet chlorophyll
References
Bailleul B, Rogato A, De Martino A et al (2010) An atypical member of the light-harvesting complex stress-related protein family modulates diatom responses to light. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18214–18219
Brunet C, Lavaud J (2010) Can the xanthophyll cycle help extract the essence of the microalgal functional response to a variable light environment? J Plankton Res 32:1609–1617. doi:10.1093/plankt/fbq104
Caffarri S, Broess K, Croce R, van Amerongen H (2011) Excitation energy transfer and trapping in higher plant photosystem II complexes with different antenna sizes. Biophys J 100:2094–2103. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.049
Chukhutsina VU, Büchel C, Amerongen HV (2013) Variations in the first steps of photosynthesis for the diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana grown under different light conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.09.015
Chukhutsina VU, Büchel C, van Amerongen H (2014) UNCORRECTED PROOF. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.02.021
Eisenstadt D, Ohad I, Keren N, Kaplan A (2008) Changes in the photosynthetic reaction centre II in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutumresult in non-photochemical fluorescence quenching. Environ Microbiol 10:1997–2007. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01616.x
El Bissati K, Kirilovsky D, Delphin E et al (2000) Photosystem II fluorescence quenching in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803: involvement of two different mechanisms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1457:229–242
Enderlein J, Erdmann R (1997) Fast fitting of multi-exponential decay curves. Optics Communications 134:371–378. doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(96)00384-7
Falkowski PG, LaRoche J (1991) Acclimation to spectral irradiance in algae. J Phycol 27:8–14. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1991.00008.x
Falkowski PG, Raven JA (2007) Aquat Photosyn. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030167
Falkowski PG, Green R, Kolber ZS (1994) Light utilization and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in marine phytoplankton. In: Baker NR, Bowyer JR (eds) Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis from Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. pp 409–434
Genty B, Harbinson J, Briantais J-M, Baker NR (1990) The relationship between non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and the rate of photosystem 2 photochemistry in leaves. Photosyn Res 25:249–257
Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG (2005) Fluorescence Induction and Relaxation (FIRe) technique and instrumentation for monitoring photosynthetic processes and primary production in aquatic ecosystems. In: Fundamental Photosynthesis (ed) van der Est A, Bruce D. International Society of Photosynthesis, Aspects to Global Perspectives, pp 1029–1031
Gorbunov MY, Kuzminov FI, Fadeev VV et al (2011) A kinetic model of non-photochemical quenching in cyanobacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1807:1591–1599. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.08.009
Goss R, Jakob T (2010) Regulation and function of xanthophyll cycle-dependent photoprotection in algae. Photosyn Res 106:103–122. doi:10.1007/s11120-010-9536-x
Goss R, Lepetit B (2015) Journal of Plant Physiology. J Plant Physiol 172:13–32. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2014.03.004
Gundermann K, Büchel C (2012) Factors determining the fluorescence yield of fucoxanthin-chlorophyll complexes (FCP) involved in non-photochemical quenching in diatoms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817:1044–1052. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.03.008
Holzwarth AR, Müller MG, Reus M et al (2006) Kinetics and mechanism of electron transfer in intact photosystem II and in the isolated reaction center: pheophytin is the primary electron acceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:6895–6900
Horton P, Ruban AV, Walters RG (1996) REGULATION OF LIGHT HARVESTING IN GREEN PLANTS. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:655–684. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.655
Ivanov AG, Hurry V, Sane PV et al (2008a) Reaction centre quenching of excess light energy and photoprotection of photosystem II. Journal of Plant Biology 51:85–96. doi:10.1007/BF03030716
Ivanov AG, Sane PV, Hurry V et al (2008b) Photosystem II reaction centre quenching: mechanisms and physiological role. Photosyn Res 98:565–574. doi:10.1007/s11120-008-9365-3
Jeffery SW, Leroi JM (1997) Simple procedures for growing SCOR reference microalgal cultures. In: Jeffery SW, Mantoura RFC, Wright SW (eds) Plankton Pigments in Oceanography; Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology. … oceanographic methods. UNESCO, pp 181–205
Joliot A, Joliot P (1964) Etude cinetique de la reaction photochimique liberant loxygene au cours de la photosynthese. C R Acad Sci Paris 258:4622–4625
Kirilovsky D, Kerfeld CA (2013) The Orange Carotenoid Protein: a blue-green light photoactive protein. Photochem Photobiol Sci 12:1135–1143. doi:10.1039/c3pp25406b
Kolber ZS, Prásil O, Falkowski PG (1998) Measurements of variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: defining methodology and experimental protocols. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1367:88–106
Krieger-Liszkay A, Fufezan C, Trebst A (2008) Singlet oxygen production in photosystem II and related protection mechanism. Photosyn Res 98:551–564. doi:10.1007/s11120-008-9349-3
Ku HH (1966) Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section C: Engineering and Instrumentation 70C:263. doi:10.6028/jres.070c.025
Lakowicz JR (2007) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Third Edition. 1–960
Lambrev PH, Miloslavina Y, Jahns P, Holzwarth AR (2012) On the relationship between non-photochemical quenching and photoprotection of Photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817:760–769. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.002
Lavaud J, Rousseau B, Etienne A-L (2002) In diatoms, a transthylakoid proton gradient alone is not sufficient to induce a non-photochemical fluorescence quenching. FEBS Lett 523:163–166
Lavaud J, Materna AC, Sturm S et al (2012) Silencing of the Violaxanthin De-Epoxidase Gene in the Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Reduces Diatoxanthin Synthesis and Non-Photochemical Quenching. PLoS ONE 7:e36806. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036806.t003
Lee HY, Hong YN, Chow WS (2001) Photoinactivation of photosystem II complexes and photoprotection by non-functional neighbours in Capsicum annuum L. leaves. Planta 212:332–342
Lepetit B, Sturm S, Rogato A et al (2013) High light acclimation in the secondary plastids containing diatom phaeodactylum tricornutum is triggered by the redox state of the plastoquinone pool. Plant Physiol 161:853–865. doi:10.1104/pp.112.207811
Li XP, Björkman O, Shih C et al (2000) A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature 403:391–395. doi:10.1038/35000131
Matsubara S, Chow WS (2004) Populations of photoinactivated photosystem II reaction centers characterized by chlorophyll a fluorescence lifetime in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:18234–18239. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403857102
Miloslavina Y, Grouneva I, Lambrev PH et al (2009) Ultrafast fluorescence study on the location and mechanism of non-photochemical quenching in diatoms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1787:1189–1197. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.05.012
Moya I, Hodges M, Briantais JM, Hervo G (1986) Evidence That the Variable Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Chlamydomonas-Reinhardtii Is Not Recombination Luminescence. Photosyn Res 10:319–325. doi:10.1007/BF00118297
Müller P, Li X-P, Niyogi KK (2001) Non-Photochemical Quenching. A Response to Excess Light Energy. Plant Physiol 125:1558–1566. doi:10.1104/pp.125.4.1558
Nelson DM, Tréguer P, Brzezinski MA et al (1995) Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:359–372. doi:10.1029/95gb01070
Niyogi KK, Truong TB (2013) Evolution of flexible non-photochemical quenching mechanisms that regulate light harvesting in oxygenic photosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:307–314. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.011
Olaizola M, La Roche J, Kolber Z, Falkowski PG (1994) Non-photochemical fluorescence quenching and the diadinoxanthin cycle in a marine diatom. Photosyn Res 41:357–370. doi:10.1007/BF00019413
Peers G, Truong TB, Ostendorf E et al (2009) An ancient light-harvesting protein is critical for the regulation of algal photosynthesis. Nature 462:518–521. doi:10.1038/nature08587
Rehman AU, Cser K, Sass L, Vass I (2013) Characterization of singlet oxygen production and its involvement in photodamage of Photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 by histidine-mediated chemical trapping. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:689–698. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.02.016
Roelofs TA, Lee CH, Holzwarth AR (1992) Global Target Analysis of Picosecond Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetics From Pea-Chloroplasts - a New Approach to the Characterization of the Primary Processes in Photosystem-Ii Alpha-Units and Beta-Units. Biophys J 61:1147–1163
Ruban AV, Lavaud J, Rousseau B et al (2004) The super-excess energy dissipation in diatom algae: comparative analysis with higher plants. Photosyn Res 82:165–175. doi:10.1007/s11120-004-1456-1
Schatz GH, Brock H, Holzwarth AR (1987) Picosecond kinetics of fluorescence and absorbance changes in photosystem II particles excited at low photon density. Proc Natl Acad Sci 84:8414–8418
Schatz GH, Brock H, Holzwarth AR (1988) Kinetic and energetic model for the primary processes in photosystem II. Biophys J 54:397–405
Schweitzer RH, Brudvig GW (1997) Fluorescence quenching by chlorophyll cations in photosystem II. Biochemistry 36:11351–11359. doi:10.1021/bi9709203
van Oort B, Amunts A, Borst JW et al (2008) Picosecond Fluorescence of Intact and Dissolved PSI-LHCI Crystals. Biophys J 95:5851–5861. doi:10.1529/biophysj.108.140467
Vass I, Cser K (2009) Janus-faced charge recombinations in photosystem II photoinhibition. Trends Plant Sci 14:200–205. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.009
Wagner B, Goss R, Richter M et al (1996) Picosecond time-resolved study on the nature of high-energy-state quenching in isolated pea thylakoids different localization of zeaxanthin dependent and independent quenching mechanisms. J Photochem Photobiol, B 36:339–350. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07391-5
Yamamoto HY (1979) Biochemistry of the violaxanthin cycle in higher plants. Pure Appl Chem. doi:10.1351/pac197951030639
Acknowledgments
F.K.’s work on the development of the models for fluorescence signal formation was supported by the grant from the Russian Science Foundation (Grant #14-17-00451). M.G acknowledges support from Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program (Project #RC-201202), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ocean Biology and Biogeochemistry Program (Grant #NNX08AC24G).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Exciton-radical pair equilibrium (ERPE) kinetic models describe energy migration in the PS2 antenna–RC complex, including charge separation processes, charge recombination, and electron transfer. Figure 9a shows an example of a ERPE kinetic model (Schatz et al. 1988; Ivanov et al. 2008b). Upon excitation of the PS2 antenna complex a rapid excitation equilibrium (<10 ps) (Holzwarth et al. 2006) is achieved between antenna and RC (exciton exchange is represented by trapping (k t) and detrapping (k −t) rate constants). Due to this rapid equilibrium, ERPE models assume that the excited states of antenna and RC are not separated and are, therefore, represented by only one compartment (i.e., k t and k−t are not determined within the framework of this model). The next step is the process of charge separation in the RC (with the rate constant of k 1) that results in the formation of a radical pair (RP) P680+I−. There are 4 major pathways of energy conversion and recombination of the RP. First, RP could recombine to the antenna/RC excited state (with the rate constant k −1). Alternatively, it may recombine (through non-radiative decay) to the ground state (k 2D), to the triplet excited state of P680 (k 2T, spin dephasing), or transfer electron to Q a (k 2Q, charge stabilization). Charge stabilization takes place in open RCs, whereas the other two pathways dominate in closed RCs. Deactivation of the excited states in the antenna complex is represented by non-radiative (thermal dissipation, kDa) and radiative (fluorescence, k F) processes.
From the two-compartment model presented on Fig. 9b one can derive up to four rate constants: antenna deactivation rate constant (that includes both heat dissipation and fluorescence), apparent rate constant of charge separation (k −1) and charge recombination (k 1), and rate constant of photochemical (kQ, for open RC) or non-photochemical (k 2 = k T + k D, for closed RC) losses in the RC. Analytically solution for the system of kinetic equations that describe this 2-compartment model predicts two exponential components for fluorescence decay kinetics (i.e., the kinetics is described by four parameters—two pre-exponential amplitudes and two lifetimes). Thus, in order to determine all four rates of the kinetic model from the experimental lifetime kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence decay, we should be able to allocate two lifetimes related to PS2 fluorescence at a given state of photosynthetic apparatus (e.g., open or closed).
In order to calculate rates of exciton and electron transfer for exciton-radical pair equilibrium model (Fig. 9c), we solved a system of differential equations using a Matlab(c) software.
where X, Y, and Z are relative concentrations of ground state chlorophyll a (including P680), excited state of chlorophyll a (antenna and P680), and radical pair (P680+I−), respectively. In the case of open RC, W is the relative concentration of charge-stabilized state (although, strictly speaking, it also includes concentration of intermediates that lead to P680 triplet state formation), while for closed reaction centers W represents the total concentration of intermediates after RP non-radiative charge recombination (including triplet excited state of P680, Fig. 9a).
Below we present a solution of Eq. (10) for Y(t) [similar solutions could be obtained for X(t), Z(t), and W(t)]:
A 1, A 2, τ 1, and τ 2 depend on the four rate constants (ka, k 1, k −1, and k 2) of system (A 1). Taking into account that A 2 = 1 − A 1, we have only three independent equations to connect experimentally determined amplitudes and lifetimes with four rates of exciton and electron transfer.
In order to obtain all four rates, we either have to fix one of the rates (or their combination) or determine them independently. For open reaction centers (F o level), a common practice is to use the yield of charge stabilization (i.e., \( {\text{W}}(t \to \infty ) \)) determined from picosecond absorption kinetics (Schatz et al. 1988) as it provides us with an additional equation that combines these 4 rate constants. We can determine the yield of charge stabilization from system Eq. (10):
To present it is well established that the yield of charge stabilization in the RC is ~90 % (Schatz et al. 1987; Caffarri et al. 2011). We followed the procedure described by (Lambrev et al. 2012) and used W max = 87 %, which allowed us (using Eq. (11) and expression for W max) to determine all four rates for open RC (F o level, Table 3). In order to determine all four rates for closed reaction (F M level), we used k a values previously determined for open RC. A more complex approach was used to evaluate all four rates in the closed reaction centers with induced NPQ, because induction of NPQ is expected to change antenna dissipation rate constant (k a). In order to resolve this problem, we performed measurements of variable fluorescence using FIRe technique along with the lifetime measurements. Analysis of the induction curves allows determination of PS2 functional absorption cross section (σ PS2 (Gorbunov and Falkowski 2005)), which is proportional to the probability of charge stabilization in the RC. Thus, its relative changes upon NPQ activation would reflect changes in the quantum yield of charge stabilization in the RC of PS2. W max for open RC (F o level) also gives us the probability of charge stabilization. Thus, relative changes in σ PS2 and Wmax determined under quenched and non-quenched conditions would be equal.
(here \( {\text{k}}_{{2{\text{Q}}}} \) is the rate of charge stabilization).
If we assume that changes in the probability of charge stabilization (in open RC) are related to changes only in the antenna deactivation rate constant (k a), while apparent rate constants of charge separation (k 1) and charge recombination (k −1), as well as charge stabilization (k 2) remained constant upon NPQ activation, than from Eq. (13) we can derive the equation to determine antenna deactivation rates under NPQ conditions:
This assumption is based on the fact that open and closed RC have very different rates of exciton and electron transfer (k 1, k −1, k 2) and, changes induced by actinic light would affect open reaction center rates to a lesser extent. Moreover: (1) we do not see significant changes in k 1 during NPQ induction (Fig. 7b); (2) due to small values of k −1 compared to other rate expressions (14) is not as “sensitive” to changes in this rate and even a two-fold change in k −1 would not affect the value of k a significantly (estimated changes are < 5 %); (3) there is a 8.1 108 s−1 increase in k 2 in closed RC upon actinic light illumination related to non-photochemical losses in the RC (Table 3); if this is to be added to the rate of k 2 for open RC (26.8 × 108 s−1, Table 3) and the resulting rate 34.9 × 108 s−1 is to be used in (A5), it would have only a minor (<2 %) effect on k a as compared with using 26.8 × 108 s−1.
Using the expression for rate constant of antenna deactivation under NPQ conditions (\( {\text{k}}_{\text{a}}^{\text{NPQ}} \)) and Eq. (11) equations, we can calculate other rate constants (k 1, k −1, k 2) and yields of energy dissipation in the reaction center (W max) and antennae (X max = 1 − W max) of PS2 upon NPQ activation (\( F_{\text{M}}^{\text{NPQ}} \) level). Table 5 provides a brief summary of the above-described procedure.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzminov, F.I., Gorbunov, M.Y. Energy dissipation pathways in Photosystem 2 of the diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, under high-light conditions. Photosynth Res 127, 219–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-015-0180-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-015-0180-3