Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 124, Issue 2, pp 159–169 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in the content of dehydrins in mesophyll cells of common pine needles

  • Natalia Korotaeva
  • Anatolii Romanenko
  • Galina Suvorova
  • Maria V. Ivanova
  • Lidia Lomovatskaya
  • Gennadii Borovskii
  • Victor Voinikov
Regular Paper

Abstract

The appearance of dehydrins (DHNs) in cells is required for the development of cold resistance. DHNs are therefore considered specific markers of cold resistance by some authors. DHNs accumulate in plants concomitantly with a reduction of intracellular water content, and presumably protect membranes and proteins from damage caused by moisture loss. DHN content in pine needles increases in spring and autumn when moisture availability and temperatures are most unfavorable. The present work is focused on seasonal changes in DHN content in various mesophyll-cell compartments of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles in association with changes in environmental factors. In spring, the number of thylakoid membranes per granum was lower than in summer and autumn. An increase in needle content of DHNs with approximate masses of 76, 73, 72, 35, and 17 kD in spring and autumn, associated with needle dehydration during this period, is shown here. The largest increase in DHN content was observed in spring, with the highest amount of DHNs presented in chloroplast membrane system including grana thylakoids, stromal thylakoids, and the two chloroplast envelope membranes and in cell walls. In the autumn, most DHNs were localized in chloroplasts and mitochondria.

Keywords

Dehydrins Pinus sylvestris L. Seasonal changes Cell compartments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to L.D. Kopytova and L.S. Yan’kova, PhD, for their contribution to the acquisition of experimental data.

Funding

Program of Russian Academy of Sciences “Wildlife: present state and development problems” (2013); Baikal Analytic Core Facility of the Irkutsk Scientific Centre.

Supplementary material

11120_2015_112_MOESM1_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 35 kb)
11120_2015_112_MOESM2_ESM.tif (13.6 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 41 kb)
11120_2015_112_MOESM3_ESM.tif (12.9 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. Change of ASWS in 2007. For data analysis, values of total reserves in the 0–50 cm layer of soil were used. Soil moisture contents were determined for each 10 cm soil layer to a 50 cm depth every ten days during the growth period using the thermostat-gravimetric method. The available soil water supply (ASWS) was calculated by a commonly used technique (Fedorovsky 1975) as the difference between the soil moisture content and the moisture inaccessible for plants, which taken to be equal to the maximum amount of hygroscopic water held by soil particles multiplied by a factor of 1.5. Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 13,894 kb)
11120_2015_112_MOESM4_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2 Change of the free water content (FWC) in pine needles in 2007. The content of free water in the needles was determined by the refractometric method as a percentage of the total amount of water released into a 30 % solution of sucrose. Each replication contained 0.6 g of needles containing equal quota of the needles from each of three pines. Standard deviations are presented. n = 6; p ≤ 0.05. Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 13,196 kb)

References

  1. Arora R, Rowland LJ (2011) Physiological research on winter-hardiness: deacclimation resistance, reacclimation ability, photoprotection strategies, and a cold acclimation protocol design. HortScience 46:1070–1078Google Scholar
  2. Bae J-J, Choo Y-S, Ono K, Sumida A, Hara T (2010) Photoprotective mechanisms in cold-acclimated and nonacclimated needles of Picea glehnii. Photosynthetica 48:110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battaglia M, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Garciarrubio A, Campos F, Covarrubias AA (2008) The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol 148:6–24CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boardman NK, Bjorkman O, Andersson JM, Goodchild DJ, Thorne SW (1975) Photosynthetic adaptation of higher plants to light intensity: relationship between chloroplast structure, composition of the photosystems and photosynthetic rates. In: Proceedings of III international congress photosynthesis. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 1809–1827Google Scholar
  5. Bomal C, Le VQ, Tremblay FM (2002) Induction of tolerance to fast desiccation in black spruce (Picea mariana) somatic embryos: relationship between partial water loss, sugars, and dehydrins. Physiol Plant 115:523–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Božović V (2007) Cryoprotective activity of four dehydrins expressed in E.coli and their influence on thylakoid membrane permeability in comparison to cryoprotection. Dissertation, Freie University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke MJ, Gusto LV, Quamme HA, Weiser CJ, Li PH (1976) Freezing and injury in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 27:507–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Close TJ (1997) Dehydrins: a commonalty in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Phys Plant 100:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Close TJ, Fenton RD, Moonan F (1993) A view of plant dehydrins using antibodies specific to the carboxy terminal peptide. Plant Mol Biol 23:279–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Danyluk J, Perron A, Houde M, Limin A, Fowler B, Benhamou N, Sarhan F (1998) Accumulation of an acidic dehydrin in the vicinity of the plasma membrane during cold acclimation of wheat. Plant Cell 10:623–638CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Demmig-Adams B, Adams III WW (2006) Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol 172:11–21Google Scholar
  12. Demmig-Adams B, Cohu CM, Muller O, Adams III WW (2012) Modulation of photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency in nature: from seconds to seasons. Photosynth Res 113:75–88Google Scholar
  13. Eldhuset TD, Nagy NE, Volařík D, Børja I, Rr Gebaue, Yakovlev IA, Krokene P (2013) Drought affects tracheid structure, dehydrin expression, and above- and belowground growth in 5-year-old Norway spruce. Plant Soil 366:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedorovsky DV (1975) Determination of water and physical soil properties during field and growth experiments. In: Sokolov AV (ed) Agrochemical methods of soil investigation: manual. Nauka, Moscow, pp 296–330 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Grebenshchikova VI, Lustenberg EE, Kitayev NA, Lomonosov IS (2008) Geochemistry of Pribaikal’ye environment (Baikal geo-ecological site). Academic Publishing House “Geo”, Novosibsirsk, p 234Google Scholar
  16. Hanin M, Brini F, Ebel C, Toda Y, Takeda S, Masmoudi K (2011) Plant dehydrins and stress tolerance: versatile proteins for complex mechanisms. Plant Signal Behav 6:1503–1509CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hara M (2010) The multifunctionality of dehydrins: an overview. Plant Signal Behav 25:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hara M, Kondo M, Kato T (2013) A KS-type dehydrin and its related domains reduce Cu-promoted radical generation and the histidine residues contribute to the radical-reducing activities. J Exp Bot 64:1615–1624CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirotsu N, Makino A, Ushio A, Mae T (2004) Changes in the thermal dissipation and the electron flow in the water-water cycle in rice grown under conditions of physiologically low temperature. Plant Cell Physiol 45:635–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karlson DT, Fujino T, Kimura S, Baba K, Itoh T, Ashworth EN (2003a) Novel plasmodesmata association of dehydrin-like proteins in cold- acclimated red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea). Tree Physiol 23:759–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Karlson DT, Zeng Y, Stirm VE, Joly RJ, Ashworth EN (2003b) Photoperiodic regulation of a 24-kD dehydrin-like protein in red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea L.) in relation to freeze-tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 44:25–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kjellsen TD, Shiryaeva L, Schröder WP, Strimbeck GR (2010) Proteomics of extreme freezing tolerance in Siberian spruce (Picea obovata). J Proteomics 73:965–975CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjellsen TD, Yakovlev IA, Fossdal CG, Strimbeck GR (2013) Dehydrin accumulation and extreme low-temperature tolerance in Siberian spruce (Picea obovata). Tree Physiol 33:1354–1366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koag MC, Fenton RD, Wilkens S, Close TJ (2003) The binding of maize DHN1 to lipid vesicles. Gain of structure and lipid specificity. Plant Physiol 131:309–316CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kontunen-Soppela S, Laine K (2001) Seasonal fluctuation of dehydrins is related to osmotic status in Scots pine needles. Trees 15:425–430Google Scholar
  26. Kontunen-Soppela S, Lankila J, Lähdesmäki P, Laine K (2002) Response of protein and carbohydrate metabolism of Scots pine seedlings to low temperature. J Plant Physiol 159:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kopytova LD (2003) Principal parameters of steppe plants water regime in connection with their ecology and biomorphology. Botanichezskiy zhurnal 88:111–119 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  28. Korotaeva NE, Oskorbina MV, Kopytova LD, Suvorova GG, Borovskii GB, Voinikov VK (2012) Variations in the content of stress proteins in the needles of common pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) within an annual cycle. J For Res 17:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT (2007) The role of dehydrins in plant response to cold. Biol Plant 5:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koteyeva NK (2002) Peculiarities of seasonal rhythm of ultrastructure cells of apical meristem of needles sprout and needles mesophyll of Pinus silvestris. Botanichezskiy zhurnal 87:50–60 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Ladanova NV, Tuzhilkina VV (1992) Structural organization and photosynthetic activity of Siberian fir-tree needles. UrDep RAS, Syktyvkar, p 100Google Scholar
  32. Li X-G, Bi Y-P, Zhao S-J, Meng Q-W, Zou Q, He Q-W (2005) Cooperation of xanthophyll cycle with water–water cycle in the protection of photosystems 1 and 2 against inactivation during chilling stress under low irradiance. Photosynthetica 43:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F (2004) Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus: changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity during light adaptation and senescence of leaves. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (eds) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 713–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichtenthaler HK, Burgstahler R, Buschmann C, Meiaer D, Prenzel U, Schonthal A (1982) Effect of high light and high light stress on composition, function and structure of the photosynthetic apparatus. In: Marcelle R (ed) Stress effects on photosynthesis. Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 353–370Google Scholar
  35. Long SP, Hallgren DE (1989) Change of CO2 assimilation by plants in field and laboratory conditions. In: Mokronosov AT (ed) Photosynthesis and bioproductivity: methods of determination. VO Agropromizdat, Moscow, pp 115–165Google Scholar
  36. Miroslavov EA, Voznesenskaya EB, Buboblo LS (1996) Structure of northern plants chloroplasts in relation to adaptation of photosynthetic apparatus to Arctic environment. Russ J Plant Physiol 43:374–379Google Scholar
  37. Mueller JK, Heckathorn SA, Fernando D (2003) Identification of a chloroplast dehydrin in leaves of mature plants. Int J Plant Sci 164:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novitskaya UI, Chikina PF, Sofronova GI, Gabukova VV, Makarevskii MF (1985) Physiological and biochemical foundations for pine growth and adaptation in the North. Nauka, Leningrad, p 156 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  39. Ottander CD, Campbell D, Oquist G (1995) Seasonal changes in PSII organisation and pigment composition in Pinus sylvestris. Planta 197:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perdiguero P, Barbero Mdel C, Cervera MT, Soto A, Collada C (2012) Novel conserved segments are associated with differential expression patterns for Pinaceae dehydrins. Planta 236:1863–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Petrov KA, Sofronova VE, Bubyakina VV, Perk AA, Tatarinova TD, Ponomarev AG, Chepalov VA, Vasilieva IV, Maximov TC, Okhlopkova ZM (2011) Woody plants of Yakutia and low-temperature stress. Russ J Plant Physiol 58:1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pukacki PM, Kamińska-Rożek E (2013a) Differential effects of spring reacclimation and deacclimation on cell membranes of Norway spruce seedlings. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 82:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pukacki PM, Kamińska-Rożek E (2013b) Reactive species, antioxidants and cold tolerance during deacclimation of Picea abies populations. Acta Physiol Plant 35:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richard S, Morency MJ, Drevet C, Jouanin L, Séguin A (2000) Isolation and characterization of a dehydrin gene from white spruce induced upon wounding, drought and cold stresses. Plant Mol Biol 43:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rinne PL, Kaikuranta PL, van der Plas LH, van der Schoot C (1999) Dehydrins in cold-acclimated apices of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.): production, localization and potential role in rescuing enzyme function during dehydration. Planta 209:377–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rorat T (2006) Plant dehydrins—tissue location, structure and function. Cell Mol Biol Lett 11:536–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Saringhausen E, Karlson D, Ashworth E (2002) Seasonal regulation of a 24-kDa protein from red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) xylem. Tree Physiol 22:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shwer NA, Formantchuk NP (1981) The climate of Irkutsk. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, p 246 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  49. Sun X, Lin H-H (2010) Role of plant dehydrins in antioxidation mechanisms. Biologia 65:755–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suvorova GG (2009) Photosynthesis of coniferous trees under the Siberian conditions. Academic Publishing House “Geo”, Novosibirsk, p 196 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  51. Suvorova GG, Yan’kova LS, Kopytova LD, Filippova AK (2007) Proposal of the environmental resource utilization coefficient (ERUC)—a tool for characterizing the conditions for high photosynthetic activity in conifers in Siberia, Russia. Eurasian J For Res 10:193–199Google Scholar
  52. Thomashow MF (1999) Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:571–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Timmons TM, Dunbar BS (1990) Protein blotting and immunodetection. Methods Enzymol 182:679–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tooming HG (1977) Solar radiation and yield formation. Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, p 199 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  55. Velasco-Conde T, Yakovlev I, Majada JP, Aranda I, Johnsen Ø (2012) Dehydrins in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) and their expression related to drought stress response. Tree Genet Genomes 8:957–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Venzhik YuV, Frolova SA, Koteyeva NK, Miroslavov EA, Titov AF (2008) Structural and functional features of Triticum aestivum (Poaceae) plants at the initial period of cold adaptation. Botanichezskiy zhurnal 93:1367–1377Google Scholar
  57. Vogg G, Heim R, Gotschy B, Beck E, Hansen J (1998a) Frost hardening and photosynthetic performance of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). II. Seasonal changes in the fluidity of thylakoid membranes. Planta 204:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vogg G, Heim R, Hansen J, SchaÈfer C, Beck E (1998b) Frost hardening and photosynthetic performance of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. I. Seasonal changes in the photosynthetic apparatus and its function. Planta 204:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Voznesenskaya EV (1996) The structure of photosynthetic apparatus in representatives of arboreal forms of the Vostochny Pamir highlands. Russ J Plant Physiol 43:391–398Google Scholar
  60. Welling A, Palva ET (2006) Molecular control of cold acclimation in trees. Physiol Plant 127:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Welling A, Moritz T, Palva ET, Junttila O (2002) Independent activation of cold acclimation by low temperature and short photoperiod in hybrid aspen. Plant Physiol 129:1633–1641CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Welling A, Rinne P, Viherä-Aarnio A, Kontunen-Soppela S, Heino P, Palva ET (2004) Photoperiod and temperature differentially regulate the expression of two dehydrin genes during overwintering of birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.). J Exp Bot 55:507–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wisniewski ME, Webb R, Balsamo R, Close TJ, Ming YX, Griffith M (1999) Purification, immunolocalization, cryoprotective, and antifreeze activity of PCA60: a dehydrin from peach (Prunus persica). Physiol Plant 15:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wisniewski ME, Bassett CL, Renaut J, Farrell R Jr, Tworkoski T, Artlip TS (2006) Differential regulation of two dehydrin genes from peach (Prunus persica) by photoperiod, low temperature and water deficit. Tree Physiol 26:575–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Yakovlev IA, Asante DKA, Fossdal CG, Partanen J, Junttila O, Johnsen Ø (2008) Dehydrins expression related to timing of bud burst in Norway spruce. Planta 228:459–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zagirova SV (1999) Structure of assimilation apparatus and CO2-gas-exchange in conifers. UrDep RAS, Yekaterinburg, p 108Google Scholar
  67. Zheng Y, Yang QP, Xu M, Chi YC, Shen RC, Li PX, Dai HT (2012) Responses of Pinus massoniana and Pinus taeda to freezing in temperate forests in central China. Scand J For Res 27:520–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Korotaeva
    • 1
  • Anatolii Romanenko
    • 1
  • Galina Suvorova
    • 1
  • Maria V. Ivanova
    • 1
  • Lidia Lomovatskaya
    • 1
  • Gennadii Borovskii
    • 1
  • Victor Voinikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and BiochemistrySiberian Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations