Abstract
Golf course superintendent’s knowledge of variability may be an overlooked and underutilized tool for precision turfgrass management (PTM). This case study used a qualitative GIS approach to explore 12 Minnesota golf course superintendent’s knowledge of soil moisture (percent volumetric water content) and turfgrass quality (normalized difference vegetation index) variability within fairways. Verbal responses and sketch maps from on-site initial interviews were used to gain understanding of participants’ spatial knowledge of both properties. Soil moisture and turfgrass quality were objectively measured from all fairways after initial interviews to generate interpolated maps via ordinary kriging, which were used later in follow-up interviews for each participant to verbally compare to their sketch maps. Questions about interpolated map value and barriers to adopting mapping technologies were also asked at that time. Follow-up interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis to identify reoccurring themes, and sketch maps were digitized into GIS for statistical comparison to interpolated maps. Golf course superintendents did have general knowledge of variability within their fairways that could be used for simplified PTM practices. Interpolated maps were valuable for identifying and quantifying small-scale variability for more exact PTM practices, confirming spatial knowledge, and providing detailed spatial information to new golf course superintendents or staff. Areas displaying variability in interpolated maps were not always important to golf course superintendents, so their spatial knowledge should be used with interpolated maps for further refinement of PTM practices. Barriers to adopting mapping technologies for PTM were mentioned, and several suggestions to increase adoption are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, G. E., Kruse, J. K., & Krum, J. M. (2013). The evolution of spectral sensing and advances in precision turfgrass management. In J. C. Stier, et al. (Eds.), Turfgrass: Biology, use, and management (pp. 1151–1188). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
Bell, G. E., Martin, D. L., Koh, K., & Han, H. R. (2009). Comparison of turfgrass visual quality ratings with ratings determined using a handheld optical sensor. HortTechnology,19(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.19.2.309.
Boschmann, E. E., & Cubbon, E. (2014). Sketch maps and qualitative GIS: Using cartographies of individual spatial narratives in geographic research. The Professional Geographer,66(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.781490.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Brennan-Horley, C., & Gibson, C. (2009). Where is creativity in the city? Integrating qualitative and GIS methods. Environment and Planning A,41(11), 2595–2614. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41406.
Carrow, R. N., Krum, J. M., Flitcroft, I., & Cline, V. (2010). Precision turfgrass management: Challenges and field applications for mapping turfgrass soil and stress. Precision Agriculture,11(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-009-9136-y.
Caturegli, L., Corniglia, M., Gaetani, M., Grossi, N., Magni, S., Migliazzi, M., et al. (2016). Unmanned aerial vehicle to estimate nitrogen status of turfgrasses. PLoS ONE,11(6), e0158268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158268.
Cidell, J. (2010). Content clouds as exploratory qualitative data analysis. Area,42(4), 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00952.x.
Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. London: Sage.
Cressie, N. (2015). Statistics for spatial data. New York, NY: Wiley.
Elwood, S. (2010). Mixed methods: Thinking, doing, and asking in multiple ways. In D. Delyster, et al. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in human geography (pp. 94–116). London: Sage.
Elwood, S. A., & Martin, D. G. (2000). “Placing” interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. The Professional Geographer,52(4), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00253.
Fleming, K. L., Westfall, D. G., Wiens, D. W., & Brodahl, M. C. (2000). Evaluating farmer defined management zone maps for variable rate fertilizer application. Precision Agriculture,2(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011481832064.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods,18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
Hawthorne, T. L., Solís, P., Terry, B., Price, M., & Atchison, C. L. (2015). Critical reflection mapping as a hybrid methodology for examining sociospatial perceptions of new research sites. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,105(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.960041.
Heijting, S., De Bruin, S., & Bregt, A. K. (2011). The arable farmer as the assessor of within-field soil variation. Precision Agriculture,12(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9197-y.
Jung, J. K., & Elwood, S. (2010). Extending the qualitative capabilities of GIS: Computer-aided qualitative GIS. Transactions in GIS,14(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01182.x.
Krum, J. M., Carrow, R. N., & Karnok, K. (2010). Spatial mapping of complex turfgrass sites: Site-specific management units and protocols. Crop Science,50(1), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0173.
Moore-Cherry, N., Crossa, V., & O’Donnell, G. (2015). Investigating urban transformations: GIS, map-elicitation and the role of the state in regeneration. Urban Studies,52(12), 2134–2150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014545520.
Oliver, Y. M., Robertson, M. J., & Wong, M. T. F. (2010). Integrating farmer knowledge, precision agriculture tools, and crop simulation modelling to evaluate management options for poor-performing patches in cropping fields. European Journal of Agronomy,32(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.002.
Robinson, D. A., Jones, S. B., Wraith, J. M., Or, D., & Friedman, S. P. (2003). A review of advances in dielectric and electrical conductivity measurement in soils using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone Journal,2(4), 444–475. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2003.4440.
RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from http://www.rstudio.com/.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health,18(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research,13(6), 781–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303255474.
Straw, C. M., Grubbs, R. A., Tucker, K. A., & Henry, G. M. (2016). Handheld versus mobile data acquisitions for spatial analysis of natural turfgrass sports fields. HortScience,51(9), 1176–1183. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11019-16.
Straw, C. M., & Henry, G. M. (2018). Spatiotemporal variation of site-specific management units on natural turfgrass sports fields during dry down. Precision Agriculture,19(3), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9585-2.
Winklerprins, A. M. G. A. (1999). Local soil knowledge: A tool for sustainable land management. Society & Natural Resources,12(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279812.
Acknowledgements
We extend our thanks to the Minnesota Golf Course Superintendents Association and all golf course superintendents who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Straw, C.M., Wardrop, W.S. & Horgan, B.P. Golf course superintendents’ knowledge of variability within fairways: a tool for precision turfgrass management. Precision Agric 21, 637–654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09687-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09687-1