Skip to main content
Log in

A geospatial variable rate irrigation control scenario evaluation methodology based on mining root zone available water capacity

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing concern for sustainable water use has the agriculture industry working toward higher efficiency in use of irrigation water. Recent advancements have improved the capabilities of center pivot irrigation systems to vary water application depths across the field, a technology known as variable rate irrigation (VRI). The goal of this study was to provide a geospatial method for potential VRI technology adopters to evaluate control scenarios and potential water savings using freely available datasets. Root zone available water capacity (R) was estimated spatially across two case study fields using the Natural Resources Conservation Service Gridded Soil Survey Geographic Database. The difference in application depth between conventional irrigation (CI) and both sector and zone control VRI was then estimated based on R. Prescription maps were developed to mine undepleted soil water from each irrigation management zone based on a soil water balance approach with a management-allowed depletion of 50%. For CI management, the areal 10th percentile (PCTL) of R for the field was used, while for VRI the 10th PCTL of R for each management zone was used. The highest reduction in irrigation depth was 18 mm where higher values of R were estimated; however, field average reductions ranged from 0 to 12 mm. The greatest improvements in pumpage reduction resulted from converting from sector control to zone control, while increasing the angular resolution only had a minor impact. Energy savings generally increased with higher VRI control resolution. Conclusions support previous notions that VRI may result in small pumping water reductions for some fields; however, improved water distribution may be achieved throughout the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J. B., Franz, T. E., Heeren, D. M., Neale, C. M. U., & Luck, J. D. (2017). Soil water content monitoring for irrigation management: A geostatistical analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 188, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. B., Heeren, D. M., & Neale, C. M. U. (2016). Perspectives on VRI prescription map development with satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Central Plains Irrigation Conference (pp. 59–67). Colby, KS, USA: Central Plains Irrigation Association.

  • Beven, K. J., & Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 24(1), 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boluwade, A., Madramootoo, C. & Yari, A. (2016). Application of unsupervised clustering techniques for management zone delineation: Case study of variable rate irrigation in Southern Alberta, Canada. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 142(1). http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0000936.

  • Daccache, A., Knox, J. W., Weatherhead, E. K., Daneshkhah, A., & Hess, T. M. (2015). Implementing precision irrigation in a humid climate—Recent experiences and on-going challenges. Agricultural Water Management, 147, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R., Han, S., & Kroeger, M. (1996). Precision center pivot irrigation for efficient use of water and nitrogen. In P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, & W. E. Larson (Eds.), Precision agriculture (pp. 75–84). Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., LaRue, J., Stone, K. C., & King, B. A. (2013). Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrigation Science, 31, 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinerman, E., & Voet, H. (2000). Site-specific management of agricultural inputs: An illustration for variable-rate irrigation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. J., & Miller, P. C. (2003). A review of the technologies for mapping within-field variability. Biosystems Engineering, 84(4), 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghverdi, A., Leib, B. G., Washington-Allen, R. A., Ayers, P. D., & Buschermohle, M. J. (2015). Perspectives on delineating management zones for variable rate irrigation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 117, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1061/j.compag.2015.06.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, C. (2015). The role of precision agriculture for improved nutrient management farms. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6734.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, C. B., & Yule, I. J. (2009). Soil water status mapping and two variable-rate irrigation scenarios. Precision Agriculture, 10, 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezarjaribi, A., & Sourell, H. (2007). Feasibility study of monitoring the total available water content using non-invasive electromagnetic induction-based and electrode-based soil electrical conductivity measurements. Irrigation and Drainage, 56(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyer, C. C., & Higgins, C. W. (2014). A demonstration of energy and water savings potential of variable-rate irrigation. Paper No. 141914755. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE.

  • Huang, H. H., Adamchuk, V. I., Madramootoo, C., & Yari, A. (2015). Economic optimization of the levels of control in variable rate irrigation (VRI). Paper No. 12147596 in 2015 ASABE/IA Irrigation Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Irrigation—A Tribute to the Career of Terry Howell, Sr. Conference Proceedings. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/irrig.20152147596

  • Kitchen, N. R., Drummond, S. T., Lund, E. D., Sudduth, K. A., & Buchleiter, G. W. (2003). Soil electrical conductivity and topography related to yield for three contrasting soil-crop systems. Agronomy Journal, 95, 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranz, W. L., Evans, R. G., Lamm, F. R., O’Shaughnessy, S. A., & Peters, R. T. (2012). A review of mechanical move sprinkler irrigation control and automation technologies. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(3), 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, T., Heeren, D. M., Martin, D. L., Mateos, L., Luck, J. D., & Eisenhauer, D. E. (2016). Pumpage reduction by using variable rate irrigation to mine undepleted soil water. Transactions of the ASABE, 59(5), 1285–1298. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, T., Heeren, D. M., Mateos, L., Luck, J. D., Martin, D. L., Miller, K. A., et al. (2017). Field characterization of field capacity and root zone available water capacity for variable rate irrigation. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 33(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.11963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Kranz, W., Dorn, T., Melvin, S., & Corr, A. (2010). Reducing the cost of pumping irrigation water. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Central Plains Irrigation Conference (pp. 41–50). Colby, KS, USA: Central Plains Irrigation Association.

  • Martin, D. L., Stegman, E. C., & Freres, E. (1990). Irrigation scheduling principles. In G. L. Hoffman, T. A. Howell, & K. H. Solomon (Eds.), Managment of farm irrigation systems (pp. 155–372). St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maupin, M. A., Kenny, J. F., Hutson, S. S., Lovelace, J. K., Barber, N. L., & Linsey, K. S. (2014). Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010. Circular 1405. Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 13 July, 2015, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1405/pdf/circ1405.pdf.

  • Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. (2015). Registered Groundwater Wells Data Retrieval. Retrieved 23 October 2017 from http://nednr.nebraska.gov/dynamic/wells/Menu.aspx.

  • NRCS. (2014). Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database by state. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved 13 July 2015 from: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/GDGOrder.aspx.

  • Saxton, K. E., & Rawls, W. J. (2006). Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5), 1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, T. F., Kranz, W., Pfost, D., Werner, H., Wright, J. A., & Yonts, C. D. (1999). Sprinkler irrigation systems. Ames, IA, USA: MidWest Plan Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V., & Irmak, S. (2012). Mapping spatially interpolated precipitation, reference evapotranspiration, actual crop evapotranspiration, and net irrigation requirements in Nebraska: Part II. Actual crop evapotranspiration and net irrigation requirements. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(3), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K. E., Bauer, P. J., & Sigua, G. C. (2016). Irrigation management using an expert system, soil water potentials, and vegetative indices for spatial applications. Transactions of the ASABE, 59(3), 941–948. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth, K. A., Drummond, S. T., Birrell, S. J., & Kitchen, N. R. (1996). Analysis of spatial factors influencing crop yield. In P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, & W. E. Larson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture (pp. 129–140). Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.

  • Sudduth, K. A., Drummond, S. T., & Kitchen, N. R. (2001). Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 31, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Water, Energy and Agriculture Initiative, which was made possible with funding from the Nebraska Corn Board, the Nebraska Soybean Board, the Agricultural Research Division at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) and Nebraska Public Power District through the Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research at UNL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Luck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, K.A., Luck, J.D., Heeren, D.M. et al. A geospatial variable rate irrigation control scenario evaluation methodology based on mining root zone available water capacity. Precision Agric 19, 666–683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9548-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9548-z

Keywords

Navigation