Abstract
Cranberries are grown in sensitive wetland ecosystems and precision farming could be beneficial to reduce agro-chemical pollution and increase production without expanding area. Precision farming requires knowledge of the variation of yield within-fields but cranberry harvesting methods produce only one yield value per field unless an expensive pre-harvest berry count is done. Co-operatives and extension services have an important role in precision farming to: (1) determine important factors affecting yield patterns within a growing region and (2) identify fields that would benefit most from future intensive survey. This paper reports a study to investigate temporal and spatial patterns in useable and poor quality cranberry yield for the New Jersey (NJ), USA growing region. Principal components analysis indicated that mean growing season temperature is important for understanding temporal patterns in useable yield and maximum temperatures and precipitation for poor quality yield. Multiple linear regression showed that some cultivars were susceptible to disease and poor quality yield in years with high maximum growing season temperatures. Analysis of spatial patterns using area to area and area to point kriging, local cluster analysis and geographically weighted regression helped identify clusters of fields that were consistently yielding or alternated between high and low yielding. They also showed differences between owners and soil types particularly in hot or wet years showing the different response to soil types to weather and the potential for improvement in irrigation practices by some owners. The methods used should be useful for other growing regions and crops, particularly where there are no yield monitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93–114.
Baluja, J., Diago, M. P., Goovaerts, P., & Tardaguila, J. (2012). Spatio-temporal dynamics of grape anthocyanin accumulation in a Tempranillo vineyard monitored by proximal sensing. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 18, 173–182.
Bramley, R. G. V., & Lamb, D. W. (2003). Making sense of vineyard variability in Australia. In R. Ortega & C. Esser (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on precision viticulture, 9th Latin American Congress on viticulture and oenology (pp. 35–54). Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., Patten, K., Roper, T. R., Strik, B. C., Vorsa, N., et al. (1996). Fruit mass development in three cranberry cultivars and five production regions. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 121, 680–685.
Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.
Goovaerts, P. (2008). Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in the presence of irregular geographical units. Mathematical Geosciences, 40, 101–128.
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 83, 195–213.
Jacquez, G. M., Goovaerts, P., Kaufmann, A., & Rommel, R. (2014). SpaceStat 4.0 user manual: software for the space-time analysis of dynamic complex systems (4th ed.). Ann Arbor: BioMedware.
Kerry, R., Giménez, D., Oudemans, P., & Goovaerts, P. (2010). Investigating the potential of Area-to-Point kriging for defining management zones for precision farming of cranberries. In P. M. Atkinson & C. D. Lloyd (Eds.), GeoENV 2008—Geostatistics for environmental applications (pp. 265–278). London: Springer.
Kerry, R., Goovaerts, P., Gimenez, D., & Oudemans, P. (2016). Investigating geostatistical methods to model within-field yield variability of cranberries for potential management zones. Precision Agriculture, 17, 243–273.
Kyriakidis, P. (2004). A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation. Geographical Analysis, 36, 259–289.
Lark, R. M., & Stafford, J. V. (1996). Classification as a first step in the interpretation of temporal and spatial variability of crop yield. In Aspects of applied biology, Volume 46: Modelling in applied biology: Spatial aspects (pp. 139–142). Association of Applied Biologists.
Novy, R. G., Vorsa, N., & Patten, K. (1996). Identifying genotypic heterogeneity in McFarlin’ cranberry: A randomly-amplifies polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and phenotypic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science, 121, 210–215.
Oliver, MA., Carroll, ZL. (2004). Description of spatial variation in soil to optimize cereal management. Project report No. 330, London: Home Grown Cereals Authority.
Oudemans, P. V. (1999). Detection, quantification and identification of Phytophthora species associated with cranberry bogs. Plant Disease, 83, 251–258.
Oudemans, P. V., Polashock, J. L., & Vinyard, B. T. (2008). Fairy ring disease of cranberry: Assessment of crop losses and impact on cultivar genotype. Plant Disease, 92, 616–622.
Oudemans, P. V., Pozdnyakova, L., Hughes, M. G., & Rahman, F. (2002). GIS and remote sensing for detecting yield loss in cranberry culture. Journal of Nematology, 34, 207–212.
Pozdnyakova, L., Giménez, D., & Oudemans, P. V. (2005). Spatial analysis of cranberry yield at three scales. Agronomy Journal, 97, 29–57.
Pozdnyakova, L., Oudemans, P. V., Hughes, M. G., & Giménez, D. (2002). Estimation of spatial and spectral properties of phytophthora root rot and its effects on cranberry yield. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37, 57–70.
Roper, T. R. (2001). ‘Stevens’ Cranberry. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 55, 66–67.
Roper, T. R., & Klueh, J. S. (1994). Removing new growth reduces fruiting in cranberry. HortScience, 29, 199–201.
Roper, T. R., Klueh, J., & Hagidimitriou, M. (1995). Shading timing and intensity influences fruit set and yield in cranberry. HortScience, 30, 525–527.
Roper, T. R., Stang, E. J., & Hawker, G. M. (1992). Early season leaf removal reduces fruit set and size in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.). HortScience, 27, 75.
Soil Survey Staff, (1971). Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. New Jersey; Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Burlington County. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/
Strik, B. C., Roper, T. R., DeMoranville, C. J., Davenport, J. R., & Poole, A. P. (1991). Cultivar and growing region influence return bloom in cranberry uprights. HortScience, 26, 1366–1367.
VSN International (2011). GenStat for Windows 14th Eds. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK. Web page: GenStat.co.uk
Acknowledgments
Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. provided yield data. Funding was provided as part of USDA-IFAFS grant# 2001-52103-11310. Larisa Pozdnyakova (Golovko) of RiceTec, Alvin, TX, collected and pre-processed data. Dan A. Sims, Ball State University, calculated EVI values. Dr. Goovaerts’ work was funded by Grant R21 ES021570-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerry, R., Goovaerts, P., Giménez, D. et al. Investigating temporal and spatial patterns of cranberry yield in New Jersey fields. Precision Agric 18, 507–524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9471-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9471-8