Abstract
Like many cities across North America, Montréal has experienced shrinking bus ridership over recent years. Most literature has focused on the broader causes for ridership decline at the metropolitan or city level; few have considered ridership at the route level, particularly while accounting for various operational attributes and accessibility-to-jobs issues. Because service adjustments take place—and are felt by riders—at the route level, it is essential to explore bus-ridership phenomena at this same scale. Our study explores the determinants of bus ridership at the route level between 2012 and 2017 using two longitudinal random-coefficients models in Montréal. Our findings suggest that increasing the number of daily bus trips along a route and improving the average route speed are key factors in securing bus ridership gains. The service area’s regional accessibility to jobs by public transit around the route has a positive impact on bus ridership at the route level, showing the importance of land use and network structure. Additionally, our models show that reducing service frequency along a parallel route will lead to an increase in ridership along the main route. This study can be of use to transit planners and policymakers who require a more granular understanding of the factors that affect ridership at the route level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Paulley, N., Preston, J., Shires, J., Titheridge, H., Wardman, M.: The Demand for Public Transport: A Practical Guide. Retrieved from London (2004)
Baltagi, B.: Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, New York (2008)
Beirão, G., Cabral, J.: Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp. Policy 14(6), 478–489 (2007)
Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T.: Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transp. Policy 9(2), 107–116 (2002)
Berrebi, S., Watkins, K.: Who’s ditching the bus? Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 136, 21–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.016
Bliss, L.: More Routes = More Riders. Transportation (2018). Retrieved from https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/06/more-routes-more-riders/561806/. Accessed 23 June 2020
Boisjoly, G., El-Geneidy, A.: The insider: a planners’ perspective on accessibility. J. Transp. Geogr. 64, 33–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.006
Boisjoly, G., Grisé, E., Maguire, M., Veillette, M., Deboosere, R., Berrebi, E., El-Geneidy, A.: Invest in the ride: a 14 year longitudinal analysis of the determinants of public transport ridership in 25 North American cities. Transp. Res. Part A 116, 434–445 (2018)
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., Rothstein, H.: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley, New York (2011)
Brakewood, C., Macfarlane, G., Watkins, K.: The impact of real-time information on bus ridership in New York City. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 53, 59–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.021
Campbell, K., Brakewood, C.: Sharing riders: how bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City. Transp. Res. Part A 100(C), 264–282 (2017)
Canada, S.: Monthly average retail prices for gasoline and fuel oil, by geography (2019). Retrieved from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=1810000101#timeframe. Accessed 23 June 2020
Chakour, V., Eluru, N.: Examining the influence of stop level infrastructure and built environment on bus ridership in Montreal. J. Transp. Geogr. 51, 205–217 (2016)
Cui, B., Boisjoly, G., El-Geneidy, A., Levinson, D.: Accessibility and the journey to work through the lens of equity. J. Transp. Geogr. 74, 269–277 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.12.003
Currie, G., Phung, J.: Transit ridership, auto gas prices, and world events: new drivers of change? Transp. Res. Rec. 1992(1), 3–10 (2007)
Curry, B.: Where have all the transit riders gone? The Globe and Mail (2016). Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/drop-in-transit-ridership-has-officials-across-canadastumped/article30178600/. Accessed 23 June 2020
Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T.: Perceived attributes of bus and car mediating satisfaction with the work commute. Transp. Res. Part A 47, 87–96 (2013)
Farber, S., Grandez, M.: Transit accessibility, land development and socioeconomic priority: a typology of planned station catchment areas in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. J. Transp. Land Use 10(1), 879–902 (2017)
Geurs, K., van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12(2), 127–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
Graehler, M., Mucci, R., Erhardt, G.: Understanding the recent transit ridership decline in major US cities: Service cuts or emerging modes? Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C (2019)
Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A.: Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 29(7), 1175–1194 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
Hill, T., Davis, A., Roos, J., French, M.: Limitations of fixed-effects models for panel data. Sociol. Perspect. 63(3), 357–369 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419863785
Hillsman, E., Barbeau, S.: Enabling cost-effective multimodal trip planners through open transit data. Retrieved from (2011)
Kerkman, K., Martens, K., Meurs, H.: Factors influencing stop-level transit ridership in Arnhem–Nijmegen city region, Netherlands. Transp. Res. Rec. 2537(1), 23–32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3141/2537-03
Kohn, H.: Factors affecting urban transit ridership: Statistics Canada (2000). Retrieved from
Luo, W., Wang, F.: Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ. Plan. 30(6), 865–884 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120
Magder, J.: If you think your bus is unreliable, these STM numbers might answer why. Montreal Gazette (2018). Retrieved from https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/if-you-think-your-bus-is-unreliable-these-stm-numbers-might-answer-why
Manville, M., Taylor, B., Blumenberg, E.: Falling transit ridership: California and Southern California (2018). Retrieved from California
Miller, C., Savage, I.: Does the demand response to transit fare increases vary by income? Transp. Policy 55, 79–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.01.006
Miller, E., Shalaby, A., Diab, E., Kasraian, D.: Canadian Transit Ridership Trends Study (2018). Retrieved from Toronto, Ontario: cutaactu.ca/sites/default/files/cuta_ridership_report_final_october_2018_en.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d.: Move, achieve, succeeed: 2012 Activities Report. Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec (2012). www.stm.info/sites/default/files/pdf/en/a-ra2012.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d.: Setting the wheels of tomorrow’s mobility in motion today: 2013 activity report (2013). Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec: www.stm.info/sites/default/files/pdf/en/a-ra2013.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d.: Conjuguer satisfaction de la clientèle et performance: Rapport annuel 2014 (2014). Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec: www.stm.info/sites/default/files/pdf/fr/ra2014.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d. Rapport annuel 2016, Direction: Excellence de l’expérience client. Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec (2015). www.stm.info/sites/default/files/pdf/fr/ra2015.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d.: Des actions concrètes au service de nos clients: Rapport annuel 2016 (2016). Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec: www.stm.info/sites/default/files/affairespubliques/communiques/stm_rapport_annuel_2016_final.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Montréal, S. d. t. d.: Rapport annuel 2017 (2017). Retrieved from Montreal, Quebec: www.stm.info/sites/default/files/pdf/fr/ra2017.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L., Wigan, M.R.: Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 13(2), 91–109 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8
Park, H.: Practical guides to panel data modeling: a step by step analysis using Stata (2011). Retrieved from https://www.iuj.ac.jp/faculty/kucc625/method/panel/panel_iuj.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Pasha, M., Rifaat, S., Tay, R., De Barros, A.: Effects of street pattern, traffic, road infrastructure, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics on public transit ridership. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20(3), 1017–1022 (2016)
St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., El-Geneidy, A.: The happy commuter: a comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26, 160–170 (2014)
Statistics Canada: 2016 Census of Canada (2016).
Tang, L., Thakuriah, P.: Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the City of Chicago. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 22, 146–161 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.01.001
Tao, S., Corcoran, J., Rowe, F., Hickman, M.: To travel or not to travel: ‘Weather’ is the question. Modelling the effect of local weather conditions on bus ridership. Transp. Res. Part C 86, 147–167 (2018)
Taylor, B., Fink, C.: The factors influencing transit ridership: A review and analysis of the ridership literature. Working Paper. UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. Los Angeles, CA (2003). Retrieved from http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/ridersipfactors.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Taylor, B., Haas, P., Boyd, B., Hess, D., Iseki, H., Yoh, A.: Increasing transit ridership: Lessons from the most successful transit systems in the 1990 s (2002). Retrieved from
Taylor, B., Miller, D., Iseki, H., Fink, C.: Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across US urbanized areas. Transp. Res. Part A 43(1), 60–77 (2009)
Thompson, G., Brown, J., Bhattacharya, T.: What really matters for increasing transit ridership: understanding the determinants of transit ridership demand in Broward County, Florida. Urban Stud. 49(15), 3327–3345 (2012)
van Lierop, D., Badami, M., El-Geneidy, A.: What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transit? A critical view of the literature. Transp. Rev. 38(1), 52–72 (2018)
Verbich, D., Diab, E., El-Geneidy, A.: Have they bunched yet? An exploratory study of the impacts of bus bunching on dwell and running time. Public Transp. Plan. Oper. 8(2), 225–242 (2016)
Verbich, D., El-Geneidy, A.: Are the transit fares fair? Publi transit fare structures and social vulnerability in Montreal, Canada. Transp. Res. Part A 96, 43–53 (2017)
Walkscore. (2019). Walk Score Retrieved from https://www.walkscore.com/. Accessed 23 June 2020
Zhao, J., Webb, V., Shah, P.: Customer loyalty differences between captive and choice riders (2014). Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/34232690/Customer_Loyalty_Differences.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1551711135&Signature=ZzgfKU2L2oEk0jj15Hdlw0O%2F%2FwI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DCustomer_Loyalty_Differences_between_Cap.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewres for their feedback on the earlier version of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur les réseaux d’entreprise, la logistique et le transport (CIRRELT) for their funding support. A big thank you to Jason Magder (Montréal Gazette) for securing the original ridership data by route from the STM through an Access to Information Act Request. The authors would like also to thank Rania Wasfi for helping in conceptualizing the required modelling approach.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Diab, Chaloux, El-Geneidy; data collection: Chaloux, DeWeese; analysis and interpretation of results: Diab, Chaloux, DeWeese, El-Geneidy &; draft manuscript preparation: Diab, Chaloux, DeWeese & El-Geneidy. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diab, E., DeWeese, J., Chaloux, N. et al. Adjusting the service? Understanding the factors affecting bus ridership over time at the route level in Montréal, Canada. Transportation 48, 2765–2786 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10147-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10147-3